Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WB30F (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-H10 was revealed 4 years before the WB30F which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-H10 matches up against the WB30F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Samsung WB30F. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung WB30F
| EX-H10 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-H10
| WB30F | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | June 2009 | More modern by 43 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung WB30F
| EX-H10 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 provides outer dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H10 versus the WB30F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and WB30F is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over specifications. The picture underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and WB30F.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB30F to offer more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung WB30F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-06-11 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 128 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $180 |
