Clicky

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim EX-H10 front
 
Samsung WB30F front
Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs

Casio EX-H10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
  • Released June 2009
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
  • Released January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WB30F (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-H10 was revealed 4 years before the WB30F which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-H10 matches up against the WB30F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung WB30F

 EX-H10 WB30F 
Focus manually Very precise focus

Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-H10

 WB30F EX-H10 
ReleasedJanuary 2013June 2009More modern by 43 months

Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung WB30F

 EX-H10 WB30F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 provides outer dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H10 versus the WB30F.

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and WB30F is 93 and 96 respectively.

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over specifications. The picture underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and WB30F.

To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB30F to offer more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-H10
Portrait photography with Samsung WB30F
27
has manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
35
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-H10
Street photography with Samsung WB30F
56
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
64
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (128 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB30F Sports photography factors
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
45
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Travel photography factors
Samsung WB30F Travel photography factors
57
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
missing Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
69
lighter than others (128 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB30F Landscape photography advice
41
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
no manual mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
43
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Vlogging advice
Samsung WB30F Vlogging advice
28
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone support
33
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
lighter than others (128g)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H10 and Samsung WB30F
 Casio Exilim EX-H10Samsung WB30F
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-H10 Samsung WB30F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2009-06-11 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing range 7cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.60 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 194 grams (0.43 pounds) 128 grams (0.28 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-90 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $300 $180