Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 9000

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Released August 2008
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Alternate Name is mju 9000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 9000 Overview

The following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-520 and Olympus 9000, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is very similar but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and 9000 (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-520 was manufactured 8 months earlier than the 9000 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-520 scores against the 9000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus 9000

 E-520 9000 
Manual focus Very exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus E-520

 9000 E-520 
ReleasedMay 2009August 2008Newer by 8 months

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus 9000

 E-520 9000 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display size
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 features outer measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-520 and Olympus 9000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-520 compared to the 9000.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and 9000 is 68 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The pic here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and 9000.

As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus 9000 will offer you more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography information
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography information
59
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
21
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography information
Olympus 9000 Street photography information
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
heavier than competition (225g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 Sports photography factors
Olympus 9000 Sports photography factors
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
better than average battery pack (650 shots)
sensor has phase detect AF
slow frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography info
Olympus 9000 Travel photography info
52
better than average battery pack (650 CIPA)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
58
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (225g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography information
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography information
58
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
better than average battery pack (650 shots)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse mode
32
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 9000 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
27
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
does not feature selfie friendly display
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external mic port
heavier than competition (225 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Olympus 9000
 Olympus E-520Olympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-520 Olympus Stylus 9000
Also called - mju 9000
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2008-08-20 2009-05-14
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 50
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-280mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552 grams (1.22 pounds) 225 grams (0.50 pounds)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 shots -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $400 $300