Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-M1
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H15 was revealed 5 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-H15 matches up vs the WG-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-H15 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+346k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-H15
| WG-M1 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 57 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-H15 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 features exterior measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H15 and the WG-M1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and WG-M1 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing just by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and WG-M1.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you should always consider the age of the cameras into account. The older EX-H15 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $2,000 |