Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL102
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H15 was introduced 13 months later than the SL102 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-H15 matches up vs the SL102 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-H15 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 13 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-H15
| SL102 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung SL102
| EX-H15 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H15 enjoys external dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-H15 vs the SL102.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and SL102 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The visual below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and SL102.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-H15 to provide more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The newer EX-H15 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also referred to as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lb) | 116 grams (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $300 | $130 |