Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL320
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB1000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is pretty similar and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-H15 was revealed 11 months after the TL320 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the TL320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Samsung TL320. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung TL320
| EX-H15 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 11 months |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Casio EX-H15
| TL320 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung TL320
| EX-H15 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H15 provides external measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung TL320 has proportions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-H15 versus the TL320.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and TL320 is 93 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by going over specifications. The image underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H15 and TL320.
Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-H15 to deliver more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The younger EX-H15 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung TL320 |
| Also called as | - | WB1000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $380 |