Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB50F
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Announced January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB50F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H15 was announced 5 years prior to the WB50F and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-H15 grades versus the WB50F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung WB50F
| EX-H15 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-H15
| WB50F | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 48 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung WB50F
| EX-H15 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 features external dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has sizing of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB50F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H15 versus the WB50F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and WB50F is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The photograph below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and WB50F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB50F to provide you with extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older EX-H15 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung WB50F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lb) | 207 gr (0.46 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $300 | $180 |
