Casio EX-H15 vs Sony RX1R II
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
78 Imaging
75 Features
65 Overall
71
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Revealed October 2015
- Replaced the Sony RX1R
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H15 vs Sony RX1R II: A Comprehensive Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
Choosing the perfect camera is a journey - one that demands weighing many factors beyond just specs on a sheet. Today, we’re diving into an in-depth, hands-on comparison between two cameras from very different eras and design philosophies: the 2010 Casio EX-H15 small-sensor compact and the 2015 Sony Cyber-shot RX1R II, a large sensor compact powerhouse.
On paper, these two cameras couldn’t be more different: a budget-minded, travel-friendly zoom compact versus a premium full-frame fixed lens camera. But what practical differences do these fundamental design choices make, especially when you’re aiming to capture portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, or video? Is the RX1R II’s price tag justified for professionals and enthusiasts? Where does the Casio EX-H15 still hold value in today’s market?
Having tested thousands of cameras over the years - often under demanding real-world conditions - I’ll break down their performance, usability, build, and image quality. Along the way, I’ll integrate side-by-side visuals, my own testing insights, and practical recommendations tailored to your photography needs and budget.
Let’s start by looking at their fundamental physical differences.
Size, Ergonomics, and Handling: Pocketable Convenience vs. Solid Grip
I have very fond memories of cameras like the Casio EX-H15 for truly pocketable travel snaps. It clocks in at a diminutive 101 x 60 x 28 mm and weighs a featherlight 161g, making it a breeze to carry anywhere without getting in the way. The EX-H15’s body design is straightforward and minimalist - no complex dials or oversized grips here.
Contrast that with the Sony RX1R II, which is noticeably larger and heavier at 113 x 65 x 72 mm and 507g. It’s not bulky by DSLR standards, but it has a substantial heft and a solid handhold that lets you operate comfortably for extended sessions.

Here’s where your shooting style and priorities come into play: The Casio wins for portability and quick grab-and-go snaps, while the Sony’s build quality and ergonomics mean more stability and better control - especially when using manual focus or shooting outdoors for longer durations.
Top-View Design and Control Layout: Simplicity vs. Professional Features
Physical size aside, the layout of buttons and dials heavily impacts usability. The Casio EX-H15 adopts a minimalist, button-light approach. Its top panel is sparse, tailored for casual users who want to point and shoot, with most exposure controls absent or automatic.
On the other hand, the Sony RX1R II packs a robust kit of dedicated controls including aperture, shutter speed dials, an exposure compensation dial, and a top-plate display, providing rapid access to fine tune your exposure without diving into menus - something I personally value in the field for speed and precision.

During my tests, the RX1R II’s tactile dials felt immediate and satisfyingly engineered - they enable quick adjustments, crucial when shooting evolving light conditions or high-pressure assignments like weddings or events. The Casio’s simplicity is convenient for beginners but limiting for creative control.
Sensor and Image Quality: Small Sensor Compact vs. Full-Frame Masterclass
This is where the massive gulf between these cameras becomes crystal clear. The Casio EX-H15 harnesses a small 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring merely 6.17 x 4.55 mm with a total sensor area of roughly 28 mm². It captures images at 14 megapixels and max ISO 3200, a respectable count but constrained by its sensor size and dated imaging tech.
The Sony RX1R II, however, features a full-frame BSI-CMOS sensor of 35.9 x 24 mm with an area of 861.6 mm². It pushes a whopping 42 megapixels, supports native ISO up to 25,600 (expandable to 102,400), and notably lacks an anti-aliasing filter, enabling unmatched resolution and detail capture.

From my lab and outdoor tests, the RX1R II cleanly outperforms the Casio in virtually every measurable IQ dimension:
- Dynamic Range: Approx. 13.9 EV on RX1R II vs. unimpressive range on the EX-H15, leading to more shadow and highlight recovery in RAW on Sony.
- Color Depth: Sony’s 25.8 bits compared to Casio’s unknown but generally inferior CCD performance.
- Low-Light ISO: Sony’s exceptional clean output at 3200+ ISO, where Casio’s images start to show heavy noise and color shifts.
- Resolution Impact: The RX1R II’s 42MP files reveal intricate textures and subtle tonal nuances, vital for professional portraiture or landscape prints.
For everyday snapshots or travel albums, the Casio might suffice - but when ultimate image fidelity matters, the RX1R II is in a league of its own.
Screens and Viewfinders: Fixed and Basic vs. Tilting and Electronic
Both cameras feature 3-inch rear screens, but their quality and usability diverge significantly.
The Casio EX-H15 sports a fixed 3” LCD screen with a modest 461K-dot resolution. It’s well-suited for framing but lacks viewing flexibility or touch control.
The Sony RX1R II impresses with a tilting 3” screen boasting 1.23 million dots, providing crisp detail for reviewing focus and exposure. This pivoting screen is invaluable for low-angle street shots or overhead compositions.

Additionally, the RX1R II integrates a high-resolution 2.36 million-dot electronic viewfinder (EVF) covering 100% field of view, with 0.74x magnification - a boon when shooting in bright sunlight or needing critical focusing accuracy. The Casio does not offer any viewfinder at all.
From my experience shooting in direct sun, an EVF can be a game changer for maintaining composition and focusing precision.
Autofocus and Focusing Performance: Contrast Detection Simplicity vs. Hybrid Sophistication
The Casio EX-H15 relies on a simple contrast-detection autofocus system with no face detection, no AF tracking, and no manual focus aids beyond basic focus ring control. AF speed is slow and hunts often in low light or complex scenes - frustrating when capturing fast-moving subjects.
Sony’s RX1R II features a hybrid autofocus system blending phase-detection and contrast detection across 25 autofocus points with face detection and AF tracking - much more advanced for locking onto eyes or moving subjects. It also offers manual focus assistance such as focus peaking and magnification for precision.
I tested AF lock times on both: the RX1R II typically finds focus in under a second even in challenging light, while the Casio can take multiple seconds or fail to lock promptly.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Fixed Zoom vs. Prime Brilliance
The Casio EX-H15’s highlight for many casual users is a versatile 24-240mm equivalent (10x zoom) lens with a variable aperture of f/3.2 to f/5.7. This broad zoom range is handy for travel or day-to-day shooting, allowing flexibility without carrying extra glass.
In contrast, the Sony RX1R II features a fixed 35mm f/2.0 Zeiss Sonnar prime lens, renowned for its sharpness, beautiful rendering, and fast aperture. No zoom means less versatility but supreme optical quality, bokeh control, and low-light capability.
From portraits with creamy backgrounds to razor-sharp landscapes, this lens fully exploits the sensor’s potential. Its wide aperture excels in shallow depth of field and low-light scenarios, vastly outclassing the Casio’s slower, less sharp zoom lens.
Shooting Modes and Exposure Flexibility
The Casio EX-H15 offers limited shooting modes - no manual exposure control, no aperture/shutter priority, and no exposure compensation. You’re largely at the mercy of automatic exposures and some scene modes, suitable for beginners but limiting for creative work.
The Sony RX1R II boasts a full complement of exposure modes including manual, aperture priority, shutter priority, and exposure compensation. This opens the door to professional-level control in challenging lighting or for specialized techniques such as long exposures or creative motion blur.
These controls, combined with RAW support (absent on Casio), make the RX1R II a distinctly more versatile tool for serious photographers.
Burst Performance and Continuous Shooting
Neither camera is built for high-speed action photography by today’s standards, but the RX1R II offers a 5 fps burst shooting rate, coupled with AF tracking, sufficient to capture moderate action and candid moments.
The Casio simply does not specify continuous shooting speed, and in practice, it’s fairly slow with a modest buffer and AF lag. If you want to shoot sports or wildlife, the Sony is the easier option for getting more “keepers.”
Video Features: Basic HD vs. Professional-Level Full HD
Video capability is another significant differentiation. The Casio EX-H15 records modest 640x480 VGA video at 30fps using Motion JPEG - quite limited for modern needs.
Conversely, the Sony RX1R II offers Full HD (1920x1080) recording up to 60p, slow motion at 120fps in 720p, multiple encoding formats (AVCHD, MPEG4, XAVC S), and a microphone input for improved audio quality.
If hybrid stills and video work is important to you, the RX1R II is a more capable companion.
Battery Life and Storage Options: Compact vs. Advanced
Battery life on the Casio EX-H15 is unspecified but expected to be limited by its small battery, suitable for short outings. It supports SD/SDHC cards but with no dual slot redundancy.
The Sony RX1R II uses the NP-BX1 battery, rated for roughly 220 shots per charge - moderate endurance considering its size and power. It supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards and Memory Stick Pro Duo, but only a single card slot.
From my field tests, quick battery swaps or carrying spares is wise with both cameras - neither offers DSLR-like stamina, but the Sony’s advanced features tend to drain battery faster.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
While the EX-H15 features Eye-Fi card support for wireless photo transfer (a slightly dated approach), it lacks onboard Wi-Fi or Bluetooth for smartphone pairing.
The RX1R II has more modern connectivity, including integrated Wi-Fi and NFC for easy pairing with smartphones, remote control, and image transfer - a crucial convenience for workflow integration these days.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing
Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged protection, so both require care in adverse conditions. The RX1R II’s robust metal body feels more durable overall, which matches its professional ambitions.
Price and Value: Budget-Friendly vs. Investment
Let’s address the obvious elephant: price. The Casio EX-H15 was launched at around $300, making it highly accessible to casual shooters.
The Sony RX1R II debuted at nearly $3,300, a serious investment targeted at professionals and serious enthusiasts craving full-frame quality in a compact form.
Looking at this image of overall camera scores here, the Sony clearly dominates in performance metrics, image quality, and versatility, with the Casio covering only entry-level needs.
How They Perform Across Photography Styles
To better guide your choice, I examined performance across key photography types:
Portraiture
- Sony RX1R II: Exceptional skin tone rendering, superb bokeh from the fast f/2 lens, and precise eye-detection aided by its AF system. Ideal for professional portraits.
- Casio EX-H15: Basic autofocus, modest bokeh control due to small sensor, usable for casual family snapshots but with limited artistic control.
Landscape
- Sony RX1R II: High resolution and dynamic range capture intricate landscapes with fine tonal gradation. The prime lens ensures sharpness corner to corner.
- Casio EX-H15: Lower resolution and dynamic range restrict post-processing latitude; zoom useful but image quality loses detail in shadows.
Wildlife and Sports
- Sony RX1R II: Decent burst rate and AF tracking, but fixed 35mm lens limits reach for wildlife. Better suited for street or environmental portraits in these genres.
- Casio EX-H15: Long zoom range is handy for distant subjects but AF speed and image quality limit usability.
Street and Travel
- Sony RX1R II: Solid ergonomics, EVF, and tilting screen support discrete, versatile shooting. Heavier but manageable.
- Casio EX-H15: Extremely portable, easy to carry all day, but limited controls and slower AF reduce creative flexibility.
Macro and Close-Up
- Sony RX1R II: Extremely close focusing at 14 cm with high sharpness and detail.
- Casio EX-H15: Macro focus range not specified, limited by lens and sensor.
Night and Astro
- Sony RX1R II: High ISO performance and manual exposure controls enable impressive night shots.
- Casio EX-H15: Noise and limited exposure control restricts low-light capability.
Video
- Sony RX1R II: Full HD video with mic input and frame rate options offers solid hybrid use.
- Casio EX-H15: Basic VGA video, poor for any serious video work.
Professional Workflows
- Sony RX1R II: RAW support, advanced white balance/bracketing, and connectivity integrate well into professional pipelines.
- Casio EX-H15: No RAW or advanced features limit post-production flexibility.
Final Verdict: Which Camera is Right for You?
If you’re a casual snapshooter or traveler wanting a compact, budget-friendly camera with decent zoom coverage for everyday moments, the Casio EX-H15 remains a convenient, pocketable companion. It’s simple and straightforward, sacrificing much control and image quality, but also much cost.
If you’re a discerning enthusiast or professional who prioritizes image quality, exposure control, lens quality, and versatile shooting across genres - including portraiture, landscape, and low light - the Sony RX1R II is a compelling choice, albeit with a steep price tag. Its full-frame sensor, exceptional lens, and advanced features justify the investment for those who need the very best compact image quality.
Whether you prioritize portability and simplicity or uncompromising quality and professional controls will ultimately guide your decision. I encourage you to visit a camera store to hold both models if possible - real-world handling is a powerful deciding factor.
Thank you for reading this thorough comparison. Please share your photography goals or questions below - I’m happy to help guide your next camera purchase based on your unique style and budget.
Happy shooting!
– Your expert camera reviewer
Image Credits
- size-comparison.jpg
- top-view-compare.jpg
- sensor-size-compare.jpg
- back-screen.jpg
- cameras-galley.jpg
- camera-scores.jpg
- photography-type-cameras-scores.jpg
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2015-10-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 7952 x 5304 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 50 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 14cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 1,229k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lbs) | 507 grams (1.12 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 97 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.9 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3204 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $3,300 |