Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A35
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
69 Imaging
57 Features
70 Overall
62
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A35 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Casio EX-H15 and Sony A35, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the A35 (16MP) is very close but the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and A35 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H15 was announced 20 months earlier than the A35 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-H15 scores vs the A35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Sony SLT-A35. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Sony A35
| EX-H15 | A35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Casio EX-H15
| A35 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2011 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 20 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Sony A35
| EX-H15 | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 has physical measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony A35 has sizing of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H15 and Sony A35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H15 vs the A35.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and A35 is 93 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and A35.
Clearly, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-H15 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A35 will result in more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H15 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A35 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sony SLT-A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sony SLT-A35 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2011-09-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lbs) | 415g (0.91 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 763 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $598 |
