Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-H20G versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H20G was launched 11 months after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-H20G scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| EX-H20G | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2010 |  | November 2009 | More modern by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-H20G
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| EX-H20G | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G offers external dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H20G versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-H20G against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 91 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through technical specs. The picture below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-H20G featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Casio EX-H20G will give more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The fresher EX-H20G is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-11-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lb) | 453g (1.00 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $566 |