Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S8200
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
61 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S8200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S8200 Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S8200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) is very similar and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H30 was brought out 24 months earlier than the Fujifilm S8200 making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H30 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-H30 scores versus the Fujifilm S8200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S8200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Fujifilm FinePix S8200. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Fujifilm S8200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Fujifilm S8200
| EX-H30 | Fujifilm S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Casio EX-H30
| Fujifilm S8200 | EX-H30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 24 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Fujifilm S8200
| EX-H30 | Fujifilm S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S8200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-H30 offers outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Fujifilm S8200 has specifications of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S8200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-H30 vs the Fujifilm S8200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H30 and Fujifilm S8200 is 92 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S8200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading technical specs. The pic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H30 and Fujifilm S8200.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels and you can expect similar quality of photographs however you should always take the age of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-H30 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S8200 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S8200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-960mm (40.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 0cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dot |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1700 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 pounds) | 670g (1.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $709 | $450 |
