Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-11
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Portability
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-11 Key Specs
Casio EX-H30
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2011
Olympus SZ-11
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced July 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-11 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-11, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the SZ-11 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H30 was manufactured 6 months prior to the SZ-11 and they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-H30 grades versus the SZ-11 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-11 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Olympus SZ-11. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Olympus SZ-11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Olympus SZ-11
| EX-H30 | SZ-11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Casio EX-H30
| SZ-11 | EX-H30 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus SZ-11
| EX-H30 | SZ-11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | July 2011 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-11 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H30 features outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-11 has measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-11 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the EX-H30 compared to the SZ-11.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H30 and SZ-11 is 92 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-11 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over technical specs. The picture here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H30 and SZ-11.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-H30 to offer you more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-11 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-H30
Portrait photography with Olympus SZ-11
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
good resolution (14MP)
provides face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Street photography highlights
Olympus SZ-11 Street photography highlights
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (201g)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (226g)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Sports photography highlights
Olympus SZ-11 Sports photography highlights
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
features tracking focus
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
incredible zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (200 shots)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Travel photography information
Olympus SZ-11 Travel photography information
lighter than others (201 grams)
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
no Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition in class (226 grams)
good resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
terrible battery power (200 CIPA)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Landscape photography features
Olympus SZ-11 Landscape photography features
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse mode
decently wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
terrible battery power (200 shots)
lack of Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Vlogging details
Olympus SZ-11 Vlogging details
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (201 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone port
decently wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (226 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-11 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus SZ-11 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus SZ-11 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2011-07-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 lbs) | 226g (0.50 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $709 | $253 |