Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-12
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
 
               
              89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced January 2012
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms        Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-12 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-12, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and SZ-12 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SZ-12 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-300 was introduced 8 years before the SZ-12 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-300 matches up vs the SZ-12 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images        Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-12 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Olympus SZ-12. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus SZ-12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus SZ-12
| E-300 | SZ-12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | 
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Olympus E-300
| SZ-12 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2005 | Newer by 85 months | 
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | 
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 134k | Crisper screen (+326k dot) | 
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SZ-12
| E-300 | SZ-12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen | 
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen | 
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-12 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 enjoys outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-12 has measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-12 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-300 and the SZ-12.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and SZ-12 is 67 and 89 respectively.
 
          Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-12 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and SZ-12.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus SZ-12 will show greater detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
 
          Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
 Photography Glossary
Photography Glossary
        
                
        Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Olympus SZ-12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus | 
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus SZ-12 | 
| Also called | EVOLT E-300 | - | 
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom | 
| Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2012-01-10 | 
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD | 
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" | 
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 14 megapixels | 
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - | 
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 | 
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 | 
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - | 
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 | 
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - | 
| Cross type focus points | - | - | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens | 
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 | 
| Total lenses | 45 | - | 
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 | 
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | 
| Display size | 1.8" | 3" | 
| Resolution of display | 134k dot | 460k dot | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None | 
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs | 
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1700 secs | 
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - | 
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - | 
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 | 
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 | 
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624g (1.38 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) | 
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images | 
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack | 
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | 
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC | 
| Storage slots | Single | Single | 
| Retail cost | $800 | $350 | 


