Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus 5010
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also referred to as mju 5010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus 5010 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus 5010, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the 5010 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-S200 was brought out 7 months after the 5010 and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the 5010 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus 5010 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Olympus Stylus 5010. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Olympus 5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Olympus 5010
| EX-S200 | 5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2010 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Casio EX-S200
| 5010 | EX-S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Olympus 5010
| EX-S200 | 5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 has physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Olympus 5010 has proportions of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus 5010 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the 5010.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and 5010 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes just by reading through specifications. The pic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and 5010.
To sum up, both cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical resolution and you can expect similar quality of images however you need to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The fresher EX-S200 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus 5010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Olympus Stylus 5010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Olympus Stylus 5010 |
| Also called | - | mju 5010 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 lbs) | 126g (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $0 | $150 |