Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX4
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX4, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S200 was manufactured within a month of the CX4 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-S200 scores versus the CX4 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh CX4
| EX-S200 | CX4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Casio EX-S200
| CX4 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh CX4
| EX-S200 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | August 2010 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 comes with outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the CX4.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and CX4 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The photograph underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and CX4.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-S200 to result in extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 pounds) | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $211 |