Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-520
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-1
- Renewed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-520 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-520, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR and both are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the E-520 (10MP) is pretty close and they feature the exact same sensor size (Four Thirds).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-3 was announced 6 months earlier than the E-520 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-3 matches up against the E-520 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-520 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Olympus E-520. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus E-520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus E-520
| E-3 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus E-3
| E-520 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus E-520
| E-3 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2008 |  | August 2008 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 has got external measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-520 has specifications of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-520 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-3 versus the E-520.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and E-520 is 56 and 68 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and E-520.
Clearly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP so you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you need to consider the age of the cameras into account.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Olympus E-520 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus E-520 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2008-08-20 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 45 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Highest video resolution | None | None |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lbs) | 552 gr (1.22 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 56 | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 571 | 548 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 650 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $670 | $400 |