Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizes.

The EX-S200 was unveiled 13 months before the GR Digital IV making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-S200 scores versus the GR Digital IV in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-S200 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-S200
GR Digital IV | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2011 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 13 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-S200 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 provides exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 versus the GR Digital IV.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and GR Digital IV is 96 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specifications. The pic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and GR Digital IV.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-S200 with its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Casio EX-S200 will show greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-120 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $0 | $599 |