Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB210
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB210, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-S200 was launched 11 months earlier than the WB210 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-S200 scores against the WB210 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Samsung WB210. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-S200 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Clearer screen (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-S200
| WB210 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 11 months |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB210
| EX-S200 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB210 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 and the WB210.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and WB210 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The photograph below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and WB210.
Plainly, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution and you can expect similar quality of photos though you really should consider the age of the products into consideration. The older EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB210 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 pounds) | 174 grams (0.38 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $279 |