Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Launched August 2010
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Released January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-S200 was manufactured 4 years prior to the WB50F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the WB50F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung WB50F

 EX-S200 WB50F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-S200

 WB50F EX-S200 
ReleasedJanuary 2014August 2010Fresher by 41 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB50F

 EX-S200 WB50F 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 provides outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

Examine the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-S200 against the WB50F.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WB50F is 96 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

Often, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The visual here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and WB50F.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB50F to provide extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-S200
Portrait photography with Samsung WB50F
35
manual focus
good MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
37
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Street photography camera
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (207g)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-S200
Sports photography with Samsung WB50F
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography info
Samsung WB50F Travel photography info
65
good MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (27mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
69
lighter than others (207g)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (288mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB50F Landscape photography advice
42
manual focus
relatively wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
47
manual focus
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB50F as a Vlogging camera
29
relatively wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not feature selfie friendly display
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone jack
30
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (207g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB50F
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Samsung WB50F
General Information
Brand Name Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Samsung WB50F
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-08-03 2014-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 50 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.1-6.3
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds -
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132 gr (0.29 lb) 207 gr (0.46 lb)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-120 BP70A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch price $0 $180