Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3819e/3819e71e05320e4850adef6a9b1c035b77326b01" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93366/9336655b16176ed18056f21b8b4fc3e901259e6e" alt="Samsung WB50F front Samsung WB50F front"
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The EX-S200 was manufactured 4 years prior to the WB50F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the WB50F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung WB50F
EX-S200 | WB50F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-S200
WB50F | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2010 | Fresher by 41 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB50F
EX-S200 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 provides outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-S200 against the WB50F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71a5e/71a5ee2333f92b77c0d1ad32059ec76a3253c8a3" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WB50F is 96 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e2b2/2e2b2059bdc758f369382f870ab20d573fc61657" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The visual here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and WB50F.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB50F to provide extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3457c/3457c8557bc23befd5fbeb3d3375a47b3949226e" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a52d/5a52d2b125bd0fc11d5f77bce75501b38458d321" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB50F |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 207 gr (0.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $0 | $180 |