Casio EX-S200 vs Sony TX200V
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Sony TX200V Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-S200 and Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-S200 was revealed 18 months prior to the TX200V which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-S200 grades vs the TX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sony TX200V
| EX-S200 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Casio EX-S200
| TX200V | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 18 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3.3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sony TX200V
| EX-S200 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 provides external dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 and Sony TX200V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-S200 against the TX200V.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and TX200V is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The pic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and TX200V.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Sony TX200V to give more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 pounds) | 129 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $500 |
