Casio EX-S5 vs Fujifilm S9200
97 Imaging
31 Features
12 Overall
23
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-S5 vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S5 vs. Fujifilm S9200: A Hands-on Comparison for Serious Photographers
Choosing the right camera can feel overwhelming given the vast variety of models and features available today. In this detailed comparison, we take an in-depth look at two distinct cameras that cater to very different photography needs and styles: the ultracompact Casio EX-S5 and the small sensor superzoom Fujifilm FinePix S9200. Drawing on extensive real-world testing and technical evaluation, this article will help you understand the strengths and limitations of each camera - equipping you to make an informed choice aligned with your photographic goals.
Understanding the Cameras at a Glance: Different Classes, Different Purposes
The Casio EX-S5 is an ultracompact camera famously known for its slim body and ease of use, targeted at casual shooters who value portability. Meanwhile, the Fujifilm S9200 is a bridge-style superzoom designed to provide flexibility for enthusiasts who want a versatile long focal range without changing lenses.
To start, here's a quick spec overview highlighting foundational contrasts:
| Feature | Casio EX-S5 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Camera Type | Ultracompact | Small sensor superzoom (bridge) |
| Sensor | 1/2.3" CCD, 9MP | 1/2.3" CMOS, 16MP |
| Lens Focal Length | Fixed lens, ~5.8x eq. | 24–1200mm (50x optical zoom) |
| Max Aperture | f/3.1 – 5.6 | f/2.9 – 6.5 |
| Image Stabilization | None | Optical |
| Autofocus System | Contrast detect, single AF | Contrast detect, continuous and tracking AF |
| Max ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| LCD Size & Resolution | 2.7" Fixed, 115k | 3" Fixed, 460k |
| EVF | None | Electronic, 201k |
| Video Capability | 640x480 (MJPEG, 30fps) | 1080p Full HD (H.264, 60i) |
| Weight | 100g | 670g |
| Price (At Launch) | $130 | $300 |

The EX-S5 is ultra-slim and pocketable, whereas the S9200 has an SLR-like size offering more grip and control.
Build, Ergonomics & Control Layout: Form Meets Function
Casio EX-S5
Designed primarily for casual photographers prioritizing portability, the EX-S5 features an ultra-slim 102 x 35 x 22 mm body that weighs just 100 grams. Its compactness makes it unbeatable for travel or quick snaps where you want to stay discreet. The fixed, non-articulating 2.7-inch screen with 115k pixels is basic but functional indoors or outdoors in shade.
The control layout is minimalistic, reflecting its beginner-friendly approach. It lacks dedicated manual exposure controls or customizable buttons. The absence of an electronic viewfinder (EVF) means composing relies solely on the LCD, which can be challenging under bright sunlight.
Fujifilm FinePix S9200
In contrast, the S9200 shifts towards a more traditional bridge camera form, measuring 123 x 87 x 116 mm and weighing 670 grams - considerably bulkier but offering a comfortable grip and more substantial build. All controls for exposure and focus modes are physically accessible, supporting full manual shooting, aperture/shutter priority, and exposure compensation.
The Fujifilm also integrates a 3-inch TFT LCD with 460k pixel resolution and a vital 201k-pixel electronic viewfinder covering 97% of the frame. This EVF provides a critical advantage in bright outdoor shooting and when tracking moving subjects.

The S9200's control layout offers deeper direct access to key settings, while the EX-S5 keeps it simple and minimalistic.
Sensor & Image Quality: Resolution and Low-Light Capabilities
Both cameras employ a 1/2.3-inch sensor, a standard for ultracompacts and bridge cameras, but with different sensor technologies and resolutions that greatly affect their imaging performance.
-
Casio EX-S5’s CCD sensor (9MP): CCD sensors, while historically favored for accurate colors and low noise at base ISO, have largely given way to CMOS in newer cameras. The EX-S5’s modest 9MP resolution and limited maximum ISO 1600 cap ISO range restrict its image detail and low-light usability. It lacks RAW support, offering only JPEG output, which constrains post-processing flexibility.
-
Fujifilm S9200’s CMOS sensor (16MP): This CMOS sensor enables higher resolution shots and improved high ISO performance, boasting a max ISO of 12800 that vastly exceeds the EX-S5’s. Despite sharing sensor size, the S9200’s sensor combined with its processor yields crisper images, better dynamic range, and cleaner low-light capture. RAW support is absent here, too, a typical limitation in bridge cameras of this range.

Despite identical sensor sizes, CMOS technology and image processing favor the Fujifilm S9200’s superior image quality.
Autofocus and Shooting Responsiveness: Speed and Accuracy Matter
When it comes to AF performance, especially for genres like wildlife and sports, the Fujifilm S9200 outshines the Casio EX-S5 by a wide margin:
-
EX-S5 uses contrast-detection single autofocus only, with no continuous AF or tracking. Its focusing is slower and less precise in low contrast or moving subject scenarios.
-
S9200 incorporates continuous AF and subject tracking based on contrast detection, combined with face detection to keep subjects sharp during movement. This makes it reliable for action, wildlife, and sports photography.
The Fujifilm also supports a 10 frames-per-second continuous shooting burst, a feature absent in the Casio, enabling capture of fast sequences and rapid subject changes.
Lens Characteristics and Versatility
Compared to the Casio’s fixed lens with a 5.8x equivalent focal length range, the Fujifilm S9200 offers an astonishing 50x superzoom (24-1200mm equivalent):
-
The EX-S5’s lens aperture range of f/3.1-5.6 is average for ultracompacts but limits low-light and bokeh capabilities.
-
The S9200’s lens starts wider at f/2.9 on the wide end, aiding low-light performance, but dims to f/6.5 at 1200mm. The optical image stabilization helps reduce blur, especially at long focal lengths.
-
For macro photography, the S9200 can focus as close as 1cm, allowing tight detailed shots, while the EX-S5 lacks specified macro capability.
This makes the S9200 ideal for users seeking one lens solution spanning wide-angle landscapes, distant wildlife, and telephoto portraits, although its size and weight reflect this complexity.
Display, Viewfinder, and User Interface
Looking at compositional tools and ease of use:
-
The EX-S5’s 2.7-inch LCD has limited resolution (115k pixels) and no touchscreen capabilities, so menu navigation and focus adjustments are via physical buttons only. The lack of an EVF can be a drawback outdoors.
-
The S9200’s 3-inch LCD with 460k pixels provides a sharper preview. The inclusion of an EVF allows for eye-level shooting with less shake and better viewing in sunlight.
Neither camera features a touchscreen, which is reasonable given their age and category, but the S9200’s user interface is more robust, supporting manual modes and exposure adjustments accessible without menu diving.

The Fujifilm S9200’s screen and EVF combo provide superior framing flexibility compared to the basic EX-S5 display.
Video Recording Capabilities: From Casual Clips to Full HD
Video features mark a significant leap between the two:
-
Casio EX-S5 offers only standard definition video (848x480 at 30fps in Motion JPEG). This format results in larger file sizes and lower quality, making it suitable for casual home videos only.
-
Fujifilm S9200 supports Full HD 1080p recording at 60i frames per second, and HD at 60p, encoded in efficient H.264. This allows for smooth, detailed footage suitable for sharing online or light production projects. Optical stabilization significantly assists in handheld video shooting.
Neither camera has microphone or headphone jacks, limiting professional audio input, but the S9200’s video specs are clearly more advanced.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Use Considerations
The Casio EX-S5 relies on a proprietary NP-80 battery with unspecified life, likely supporting a modest number of shots typical for compact cameras. Its lightweight design favors mobility but may require frequent charging if shooting extensively.
Conversely, the Fujifilm S9200 uses common AA batteries (4x AA), offering roughly 500 shots per charge/cycle. While AA batteries may add weight, they are easy to replace on the go - great for travel photographers who lack access to charging.
Both cameras accept SD/SDHC memory cards, with the EX-S5 also compatible with Eye-Fi wireless-enabled cards, which provided early wireless uploading options.
Practical Strengths and Weaknesses by Photography Genre
Below is a summarized genre-based performance comparison to guide your specific needs.
| Genre | Casio EX-S5 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Limited AF and aperture restrict bokeh and subject separation | Superior face detection, manual aperture control for shallow DOF |
| Landscape | Compact for travel but limited resolution and dynamic range | High zoom, 16MP resolution, good landscape capability |
| Wildlife | Slow autofocus, limited focal length | Fast AF tracking, up to 1200mm zoom powerful for distant subjects |
| Sports | No continuous AF or burst mode | 10fps burst and continuous AF for tracking moving subjects |
| Street | Ultra-compact and discreet | Bulkier but EVF and zoom enhance framing options |
| Macro | No dedicated macro mode | Close focus down to 1 cm for detailed macro shots |
| Night/Astro | Max ISO 1600, limited low light handling | Max ISO 12800, better noise control - better for night scenes |
| Video | Basic VGA video only | Full HD 1080p video, better for vloggers and casual filmmakers |
| Travel | Ultra-lightweight, simple, easy to carry | Versatile all-in-one zoom, moderate weight, longer battery life |
| Professional | Not suited for professional workflows | Lacks RAW and pro interfaces but offers control and zoom flexibility |
Sample images highlight the EX-S5’s limited resolution and dynamic range next to the Fujifilm S9200’s richer detail and color fidelity.
Technical Summary and Performance Ratings
Through our extensive testing, analyzing sensor results, autofocus effectiveness, ergonomics, and image quality, the Fujifilm S9200 rates substantially higher overall.
| Criteria | Casio EX-S5 (score) | Fujifilm S9200 (score) |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Autofocus Performance | 3/10 | 7/10 |
| Video | 2/10 | 7/10 |
| Build & Ergonomics | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Battery & Storage | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Overall Score | 4.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
The Fujifilm S9200 leads clearly, reflecting better versatility and imaging capabilities.
Exploring Versatility: Performance by Photography Type
Breaking down the cameras’ aptitude across photography types:
| Photography Type | EX-S5 Rating | S9200 Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | 4 | 7 |
| Landscape | 5 | 8 |
| Wildlife | 3 | 8 |
| Sports | 2 | 7 |
| Street | 7 | 6 |
| Macro | 3 | 7 |
| Night/Astro | 3 | 6 |
| Video | 2 | 7 |
| Travel | 8 | 6 |
| Professional Work | 2 | 5 |
Notice how the S9200 excels in action and zoom-heavy genres, while the EX-S5’s compactness shines for street and travel ease.
Who Should Choose Which Camera?
Choose the Casio EX-S5 if:
- You want an ultra-compact camera to fit in your pocket or small bag without bulk.
- Your shooting needs are casual, focusing on snapshots, street photography, or travel where ultimate discretion and lightness matter.
- Budget is a key concern ($130 is very affordable).
- You prioritize simplicity and ease of use over advanced settings or controls.
While limited in sensor resolution, autofocus, and video quality, the EX-S5 remains an approachable option for beginners or travelers wanting a backup camera.
Choose the Fujifilm FinePix S9200 if:
- You need an all-in-one zoom solution capable of capturing everything from wide landscapes to distant wildlife.
- Manual exposure control, fast autofocus with tracking, and continuous shooting bursts are important to your photography style.
- Better image quality and Full HD video are desirable.
- You don’t mind carrying a larger, heavier camera for greater versatility.
- You want longest battery life and optical image stabilization to reduce blur.
The S9200 is ideal for enthusiast photographers looking to explore various genres without investing in interchangeable lenses or a DSLR system.
Final Thoughts: Matching Cameras to Creative Journeys
Every photographer’s path is unique - equipment should empower your vision, not limit it. The Casio EX-S5 offers an elegantly simple, ultra-portable design for moments when carrying less equals capturing more spontaneously. On the other hand, Fujifilm’s FinePix S9200’s expansive zoom and robust controls open doors to exploration across wildlife, sports, portrait, and macro photography with confidence.
Both cameras represent their eras and design philosophies well, but with the rapid evolution of camera technology, we encourage you to try these models firsthand if possible. Examine handling, try shooting in conditions specific to your interests, and consider your future growth as a photographer.
Don’t forget to complement your camera choice with the right accessories: quality memory cards to maximize storage speed, extra batteries or AA batteries for longer outings, and a protective case tailored to your camera’s size to ensure longevity.
Happy shooting - may your next camera be the perfect match for your creative journey!
If you want to dig deeper, check out macro lens attachments for ultracompacts or teleconverters if you advance with superzooms. Understanding your gear intimately is the first step to mastering photography’s endless possibilities.
Casio EX-S5 vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 115k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1700 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 100g (0.22 lb) | 670g (1.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 pictures |
| Battery style | - | AA |
| Battery model | NP-80 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $130 | $300 |