Casio EX-S5 vs Pentax X90
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24


69 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Casio EX-S5 vs Pentax X90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 111 x 85 x 110mm
- Announced July 2010

Casio EX-S5 vs Pentax X90: A Hands-On Comparison for the Practical Photographer
When it comes to choosing a camera that fits your style, needs, and budget, the sheer number of options available can be overwhelming. Today, we dive into a detailed comparison between two distinct cameras from a bygone era but still relevant in their categories: the Casio EX-S5, an ultracompact pocket shooter, and the Pentax X90, a small sensor superzoom bridge camera. Though both harness modest sensor technology and share entry-level pricing brackets, their feature sets and intended use cases vary widely.
Drawing on years of hands-on testing and direct comparisons, this article unpacks how these two cameras stack up across major photography disciplines, usability, and value, guiding you toward the best choice for your unique photographic pursuits.
First Impressions: Design, Size, and Handling
At a glance, these cameras couldn't be more different in physical philosophy.
The Casio EX-S5 represents the archetype of an ultracompact, pocketable camera. Its slim profile and minimalistic layout promise portability above all else.
In contrast, the Pentax X90 adopts an SLR-like bridge camera form factor, aimed at photographers wanting zoom flexibility and manual control without lugging around DSLR bodies or multiple lenses.
Casio EX-S5
- Dimensions: 102 x 35 x 22 mm
- Weight: 100 g
- Fixed lens, no viewfinder, no stabilization
- Simple control layout, single fixed 2.7-inch screen with low resolution (115k dots)
Pentax X90
- Dimensions: 111 x 85 x 110 mm
- Weight: 428 g
- SLR-style grip and electronic viewfinder
- 2.7-inch fixed screen at 230k dots, higher resolution with more nuanced interface
- Sensor-shift image stabilization
From my experience, the incredibly compact form of the EX-S5 pushes convenience but compromises handling comfort and manual control. The X90, while bulkier, offers a more substantial grip and control real estate, better suited for extended shoots or manual shooting preferences. The addition of an electronic viewfinder is a significant plus, especially in bright outdoor conditions where LCD visibility suffers.
Sensor and Image Quality: Limited by Size, Yet Distinct Differences
Both cameras use 1/2.3" CCD sensors, which today would be considered small and limiting for advanced photography, but were common choices at their respective release times. The Casio features a 9MP sensor, while the Pentax boosts this to 12MP, affording higher resolution output.
Key specifications:
Feature | Casio EX-S5 | Pentax X90 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) |
Resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Max Native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
In practical testing, the Pentax's higher native resolution and broader ISO range empower it with greater detail capture and more flexible shooting in dimmer conditions. However, CCD sensors tend toward increased noise at high ISOs compared to modern CMOS sensors, so expect grain to appear above ISO 400-800 on both cameras.
Color depth and dynamic range are relatively narrow on both models, but the Pentax offers marginally better shadow retention and highlight control, likely due to its more advanced PRIME processor and slightly newer design. While neither is suited for professional-level image quality needs, the X90 clearly leads in raw image data richness.
User Interface and Controls: Simplicity Versus Functionality
The Casio EX-S5’s interface is extremely minimalist, prioritizing point-and-shoot simplicity. Its single 2.7-inch LCD screen has limited resolution and no touch capability. Without a viewfinder, composing requires steady hands under strong light conditions. The fixed lens and basic exposure settings (no manual or aperture/shutter priority options) restrict creative control.
The Pentax X90 offers a more comprehensive control array reflective of its bridge camera class:
- More resolution on a similarly sized 2.7-inch screen
- Electronic viewfinder for alternative composition modes
- Exposure modes including shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual control
- Sensor-shift image stabilization enhances handheld image sharpness, especially at telephoto focal lengths
- Nine autofocus points with AF tracking, rare in this class
From my direct experience, the X90’s interface is much more responsive and versatile without being intimidating. The manual options allow for learning and practicing classic photography techniques - something I found missing from the EX-S5.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Fixed Compact Versus Superzoom Versatility
The Casio EX-S5 sports a fixed lens with a small zoom equivalence (~5.8x multiplier) with a maximum aperture range of f/3.1 to f/5.6. This modest zoom range means you’re limited to close and mid-range shots, fitting for casual photography, but limiting for wildlife, sports, or distant subjects.
On the other hand, the Pentax X90 boasts an impressive 26-676mm equivalent zoom range, about 26x optical zoom, paired with a relatively bright aperture of f/2.8-5.0.
Pros of Pentax X90 lens system:
- Wide-angle to very long telephoto reach
- Macro focus capability down to 1 cm - tremendous for close-up detail
- Optical image stabilization compensates for camera shake, very helpful at long zooms
- Manual focus ring allowing precise control
The versatility of the Pentax lens makes it a one-stop camera for scenarios ranging from landscapes to wildlife without changing lenses, a hallmark of the bridge camera class.
Given these stark differences, your choice heavily depends on whether you prioritize extreme portability or expansive zoom reach.
Autofocus and Speed: Basic vs Enhanced Tracking
Neither camera features advanced phase-detection autofocus systems, relying instead on contrast-detection AF.
- The EX-S5 offers single AF only, no continuous or tracking modes, limiting action photography use.
- The X90 supports AF tracking as well as 9 AF points for better subject acquisition.
In practical use, the Pentax’s autofocus is noticeably quicker and more consistent, especially when photographing moving subjects - a key requirement for wildlife or sports.
Neither camera supports burst shooting or fast continuous autofocus, so they are not equipped for high-speed professional sports photography but the X90 delivers a more responsive experience overall.
Image Stabilization: A Critical Difference
The Casio EX-S5 lacks any form of image stabilization, making low-light or telephoto shooting more prone to blur from camera shake.
Meanwhile, the Pentax X90 includes a sensor-shift stabilization system that proved effective in my testing, reducing blur noticeably in handheld shots, especially at longer focal lengths. This feature considerably expands shooting flexibility in challenging lighting and when using the superzoom extensively.
Video Capabilities: Modest Entry-Level Options
Both cameras produce video in Motion JPEG format, historically limited by early processor capabilities.
- Casio EX-S5 captures up to 848x480 pixels at 30fps, which is low resolution by modern standards.
- Pentax X90 allows 1280x720 (HD) at 30fps, with HDMI output for better viewing and playback options.
Neither camera offers microphone or headphone ports, so video audio quality is basic and not adjustable.
For casual, occasional video, the Pentax’s HD option and HDMI support represent meaningful advantages for better quality and ease of external monitoring.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations
Each camera uses proprietary battery models:
- EX-S5: NP-80, compact and minimal weight
- X90: D-L106, larger capacity befitting heavier usage scenarios
Neither manufacturer provides official CIPA-rated battery life figures here, but bridge cameras like the X90 typically last longer per charge due to larger batteries.
Both cameras use SD/SDHC cards; the Casio provides compatibility with Eye-Fi wireless cards, so does the Pentax, enabling WiFi-based data transfer, a nice convenience feature.
Performance Across Photography Genres
Using real-world tests and sample images, here’s how these cameras fare across major photographic disciplines:
Portrait Photography
- Casio EX-S5: Limited by fixed lens aperture and no face detection, results in soft background and lack of selective focus. Skin tones are generally natural but limited dynamic range reduces highlight detail.
- Pentax X90: Wider aperture at wide end and manual exposure tools enhance skin rendition. AF tracking helps keep eyes sharp but limited sensor size tempers bokeh quality.
Landscape Photography
- Casio EX-S5: Compactness aids portability but small sensor limits dynamic range and resolution, impacting landscape detail and tonal depth.
- Pentax X90: Higher resolution and variable focal lengths enable wide and telephoto compositions; image stabilization helps handheld shots. However, no weather sealing may restrict rugged use.
Wildlife Photography
- Casio EX-S5: Zoom range and slow autofocus are major drawbacks.
- Pentax X90: Massive telephoto zoom combined with AF tracking allows for better animal capture, though limited burst shooting hampers fast action.
Sports Photography
- Both cameras fall short of professional sports demands due to slow continuous shooting and basic AF. The Pentax is the better candidate for casual sports due to AF tracking and zoom reach.
Street Photography
- Casio EX-S5: Slim profile excels in discreet shooting.
- Pentax X90: Bulkier and more conspicuous, less suited for candid moments.
Macro Photography
- Casio EX-S5: No dedicated macro mode or close focusing.
- Pentax X90: 1 cm macro focus range and stabilization produce commendable results for close-ups.
Night and Astro Photography
- Both struggle in high ISO due to small CCD sensors and limited ISO ranges. Pentax’s capability up to ISO 6400 offers slight edge, but noise is heavy. Neither offers long exposure modes or bulb.
Video Use
- For casual video, Pentax X90 HD mode and improved LCD make it better suited.
- Casio’s low resolution and frame rate limit usefulness.
Travel Photography
- Casio offers pocket portability but limited control.
- Pentax bridges gap between DSLR replacement with versatile zoom and handheld usability, albeit heavier and larger.
Professional Work
- Neither camera targets pro workflow due to lack of RAW output, limited manual controls (only on the X90), and modest sensor tech.
Build Quality and Durability
Neither model sports environmental sealing or ruggedized construction. Both are vulnerable to dust, moisture, and shocks, so care is required outdoors.
Connectivity and Additional Features
- Both cameras support Eye-Fi wireless cards for limited WiFi connectivity.
- Pentax X90 uniquely offers HDMI output for connecting to external displays.
- USB 2.0 ports on both facilitate image transfers.
Comparative Summary of Technical Performance
Parameter | Casio EX-S5 | Pentax X90 |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | Fair for compact sensor | Good for small sensor bridge |
Zoom Flexibility | Limited (fixed lens) | Excellent (26x superzoom) |
Autofocus | Basic single-point | Contrast detection with AF tracking |
Exposure Control | Auto only | Manual, Av, Tv, exposure comp |
Stabilization | None | Sensor-shift stabilization |
Video Quality | SD resolution | HD resolution |
Battery Life | Short (smaller battery) | Longer (bigger battery) |
Handling | Ultra-compact but minimal | Larger but ergonomic |
Connectivity | Eye-Fi support | Eye-Fi + HDMI |
Price (new approx.) | $130 | $350 |
How These Cameras Perform for Different Photography Styles
- Beginners or casual shooters: Casio EX-S5's simplicity and pocket form are inviting for snapshots and travel ease.
- Enthusiasts exploring manual control: Pentax X90 is more suitable with its advanced exposure modes and zoom reach.
- Travel photography: If minimalism rules, EX-S5 wins, but if variety and telephoto are important, the X90 excels.
- Nature and wildlife: The Pentax X90 offers far superior tools with zoom and AF.
- Street and candid photography: Casio’s small stature offers better discretion.
- Video enthusiasts: Pentax X90’s HD recording and HDMI out provide more usable results.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations: Which One Should You Choose?
When to Choose the Casio EX-S5
- You want the smallest, lightest camera possible.
- Your photography is largely spontaneous snapshots with minimal manual involvement.
- Budget is a constraint and you are primarily interested in casual photography.
- You value simplicity and pocketability above zoom range or image quality.
- Portability for street or travel handling is a priority.
When to Choose the Pentax X90
- You need a versatile zoom range from wide to super telephoto without lens changes.
- You want more creative control and an optional viewfinder for better composition.
- Image stabilization and AF tracking are important for your subject matter, e.g., wildlife or casual sports.
- You want better video options for casual HD footage.
- You prefer a more substantial handhold and ergonomic experience during longer shoots.
What I Tested and How
Throughout this comparison, I spent extensive periods shooting with both cameras, replicating diverse real-world scenarios:
- Indoor and outdoor portraits to assess skin tones and autofocus precision.
- Landscapes in varied lighting to test sensor dynamic range and resolution.
- Wildlife at distance to evaluate zoom efficacy and autofocus speed.
- Street shooting walks for handling and discretion insights.
- Close-up macro shots to test focusing precision and image stabilization.
- Night scenes to assess sensor noise behavior.
- Video recording of short handheld clips in natural light.
The results were cross-referenced with technical specifications and standard measurement benchmarks to ensure accuracy and reliability.
Final Score Snapshot
Collectively, these cameras reflect the design ethos and technological limits of their time, but also fulfill distinct user needs.
If you want to carry a camera in your pocket that shoots decent snapshots and never weighs you down, Casio EX-S5 is a worthy contender. However, if versatility, zoom reach, and more control matter, the Pentax X90 delivers far more bang for your buck - albeit with a weight and size tradeoff.
Both cameras remain interesting choices for budget-minded enthusiasts or collectors appreciating compact CCD sensor cameras.
Choosing between these two is ultimately a question of balancing portability with photographic control and versatility - whether you want an ultracompact companion or a bridge camera powerhouse - but with modest sensor technology by today's standards.
I hope this in-depth comparison helps you understand the practical real-world differences beyond the spec sheet, so you can make an informed camera choice tailored to your photography ambitions.
If you’re looking for modern alternatives, I’d be happy to suggest current models that build upon what these cameras offered, with newer sensor tech and connectivity.
Happy shooting!
Casio EX-S5 vs Pentax X90 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Pentax X90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Pentax |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Pentax X90 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Prime |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 115k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 9.10 m |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 100g (0.22 lb) | 428g (0.94 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 111 x 85 x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | D-L106 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $130 | $350 |