Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ed5a/5ed5a1c2394c091f336717751f8785f2557c5e72" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S5 front Casio Exilim EX-S5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45f05/45f05a61b818c9595085303936105c098b02bfb8" alt="Samsung WB1100F front Samsung WB1100F front"
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Announced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-S5 versus Samsung WB1100F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and WB1100F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The EX-S5 was released 6 years earlier than the WB1100F and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-S5 scores versus the WB1100F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S5 & Samsung WB1100F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-S5 Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Samsung WB1100F
EX-S5 | WB1100F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Casio EX-S5
WB1100F | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 60 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung WB1100F
EX-S5 | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S5 provides exterior measurements of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) and the Samsung WB1100F has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") along with a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S5 versus Samsung WB1100F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-S5 vs the WB1100F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99cd4/99cd477b19eba1750b97bbac9fed14275672579a" alt="Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F size comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S5 and WB1100F is 97 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7276d/7276d2c8d0af3d35a786967eb8d3b016d255dbd8" alt="Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S5 and WB1100F.
Clearly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB1100F to show more detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-S5 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8293a/8293a6ade51a64d20141eec34b217150277ae381" alt="Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F sensor size comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39fce/39fcef065c5b2b285e770087ed20f5ba81fa8f8a" alt="Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung WB1100F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung WB1100F |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100g (0.22 lb) | 512g (1.13 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $130 | $250 |