Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB250F
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-S5 versus Samsung WB250F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and WB250F (14MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-S5 was launched 5 years before the WB250F and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-S5 matches up versus the WB250F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S5 & Samsung WB250F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-S5 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Samsung WB250F
EX-S5 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-S5
WB250F | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | January 2009 | More recent by 48 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 115k | Sharper screen (+345k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung WB250F
EX-S5 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S5 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S5 versus Samsung WB250F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-S5 vs the WB250F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S5 and WB250F is 97 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to see the gap in sensor measurements just by going through specs. The graphic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S5 and WB250F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Samsung WB250F to provide more detail utilizing its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older EX-S5 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung WB250F |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100 grams (0.22 lbs) | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $130 | $250 |