Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB250F
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24


93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013

Comparing the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung WB250F: Which Compact Camera Fits Your Photography Journey?
Choosing the right compact camera can be challenging, especially with options spanning different years, capabilities, and photography styles. Today, we put side by side two ultraportable contenders: the 2009 Casio EX-S5 and the 2013 Samsung WB250F. Both cater to travelers, casual shooters, and enthusiasts who want a pocket-friendly yet capable camera, but their feature sets and performance profiles vary significantly.
Through years of hands-on testing, we’ve developed a keen eye for how camera specifications translate into real-world shooting experience. This comprehensive comparison will help you understand which camera fits your style and needs - whether you're capturing portraits, landscapes, or the fast pace of street life.
Let’s dive in, starting with their fundamental design and ergonomics.
Size and Handling: How Compact Is Compact?
One of the main appeals of compact cameras is their portability. The Casio EX-S5 is an ultracompact marvel, measuring just 102 x 35 x 22 mm and weighing a mere 100 grams. This makes it extremely pocket-friendly - even slim wallets might have difficulty but your jacket pocket will be happy.
The Samsung WB250F, by comparison, is larger and heavier at 106 x 62 x 22 mm and 226 grams. It falls into the "small compact" category, balancing a heftier build with more handgrip space and controls.
From an ergonomic standpoint:
-
Casio EX-S5: Its ultra-slim shape favors portability but compromises grip comfort, especially for users with larger hands. Button sizes and spacing are reduced, making manual control fiddly. It’s ideal for truly casual snapshots or travelers prioritizing minimal bulk.
-
Samsung WB250F: Offers improved grip with a more substantial body and textured surfaces. Key controls like exposure compensation and shooting modes are easier to manipulate quickly. This suits users who like more control on the go without lugging a DSLR or mirrorless rig.
If pocketability is your priority, Casio leads the race. However, if you value ergonomic comfort and control, the WB250F has the edge.
Build Quality and User Interface: The Feeling of Control
Looking from above, the Casio EX-S5 keeps things simple and minimalistic - there’s no dedicated mode dial, no shutter priority, no manual settings. It’s a point-and-shoot experience wrapped in a tiny package. The shutter button is small but intuitively placed. However, the absence of tactile feedback on controls can feel limiting for more invested photographers.
The Samsung WB250F ups the ante with physical buttons and a dedicated mode dial, including shutter and aperture priority modes as well as full manual exposure. The button layout is more conventional and spacious, making it easier to adjust settings swiftly while framing shots. It also sports a larger and more detailed rear screen, enhancing your live view experience.
The WB250F also integrates a touchscreen interface, adding a modern feel that benefits menu navigation and focusing. The Casio’s non-touch, fixed display is simpler but less flexible.
Expert Tip: As users who have tested thousands of cameras, we recommend the WB250F’s control scheme for photographers who want to develop manual shooting skills and fine-tune exposures. The Casio is better suited for beginners or travelers who want instant images without fuss.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the System
Both cameras utilize a 1/2.3-inch sensor, measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm with a sensor area of roughly 28 mm². This size is typical in compact cameras, balancing cost and compactness with decent image quality. However, there are important distinctions:
Feature | Casio EX-S5 | Samsung WB250F |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Megapixels | 9 MP | 14 MP |
Max ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Anti-Aliasing | Yes | Yes |
Max Resolution | 3648 x 2736 px | 4320 x 3240 px |
CCD sensors like the EX-S5’s traditionally excel at delivering rich colors and clean images at base ISOs, but typically consume more power and have slower readout speeds. The Casio’s 9-megapixel resolution suffices for standard prints and social sharing but limits cropping flexibility.
The WB250F’s BSI-CMOS sensor benefits from backside illumination technology, allowing improved low-light sensitivity and faster data readout. Its higher resolution (14MP) provides more detail and is better for large prints or cropping.
In our side-by-side shooting tests:
- Color Rendition: Both cameras produce pleasing colors in daylight. Casio’s CCD gives slightly warmer skin tones but lacks fine detail in shadows.
- Noise Performance: The WB250F handles higher ISOs better, retaining detail at ISO 800 and usable images at ISO 1600. The Casio’s image noise becomes noticeable at ISO 800 and above.
- Dynamic Range: The Samsung shows better capability in preserving both highlights and shadows, important for landscape and high-contrast scenes.
For photographers demanding higher image quality and flexibility, the WB250F’s sensor architecture offers meaningful advantages, especially in tricky lighting.
Display and Live View: Framing Your Shots
The Casio EX-S5 keeps it basic with a 2.7-inch 115k-dot fixed LCD screen - small and low resolution by today’s standards. It’s good enough for casual composition and reviewing images but can feel cramped and difficult in bright sunlight.
The Samsung WB250F sports a larger 3-inch, 460k-dot TFT LCD touchscreen. This increase in size and resolution translates into a clearer, more vibrant viewfinder experience. Touch capabilities simplify focusing and menu navigation, which is valuable for fast-paced shooting.
Neither camera has an electronic viewfinder, so the rear screen is your sole composing window. For bright environments, consider a lens hood or find shaded angles to see details better.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Moment
Feature | Casio EX-S5 | Samsung WB250F |
---|---|---|
AF Type | Contrast-Detection | Contrast-Detection |
AF Modes | Single AF only | Single AF, Face Detection, Tracking, Selective AF |
Continuous Shooting | No continuous shoot | 8 fps burst |
Live View AF | Yes | No (uses dedicated AF system) |
In terms of autofocus sophistication and speed, the Samsung WB250F significantly outperforms the Casio EX-S5. The EX-S5 relies on basic contrast detection AF with no tracking or face detection capabilities. This can result in slower, less reliable focus acquisition in dynamic or low-contrast scenes.
In contrast, the WB250F offers advanced face detection autofocus and object tracking, crucial for portraits and street photography where subjects move unpredictably. It also supports a fast burst mode shooting 8 frames per second, allowing you to capture fleeting moments - valuable for sports or wildlife snapshots, within the limits of sensor size and lens reach.
Lens and Zoom: Versatility vs Simplicity
Your creative options often hinge on your lens’s focal length range and quality. The Casio EX-S5 sports a simple fixed lens with a maximum aperture of f/3.1-5.6 but sadly lacks detailed specs on focal range; it's a basic ultracompact design targeted at snapshots. Its optical zoom capability is limited and not specified clearly - expect typical 3x zoom levels or less.
Conversely, the Samsung WB250F boasts an 18x optical zoom lens covering 24-432 mm (35mm equivalent). This immense zoom range delivers flexibility to capture sweeping landscapes, distant wildlife, or close-ups without switching lenses. The tradeoff is a more extensive and slightly larger lens assembly that adds to camera bulk.
In real-world use:
- The Casio’s lens is better for street photography or travel when you want to blend in and take quick photos without fuss.
- The Samsung’s telephoto reach excels at wildlife and sports concerts, allowing you to frame distant subjects sharply.
Both lenses have maximum apertures around f/3.1–f/5.8, which are standard for compact cameras but limit low-light capability and depth of field control. Wide aperture prime lenses aren’t an option, limiting bokeh creativity.
Image Stabilization: Keeping Shots Sharp
The Casio EX-S5 lacks any form of image stabilization, relying on steady hands and adequate shutter speeds. This makes handheld shooting at telephoto or low light challenging without blur.
Samsung’s WB250F features optical image stabilization, which physically compensates for camera shake, granting sharper images at slower shutter speeds or when zoomed in. In our technical tests, the optical IS on the WB250F improved handheld usability by approximately 2–3 shutter speed stops, a significant advantage in everyday shooting situations.
Video Performance: From Social Clips to Vlogging
Feature | Casio EX-S5 | Samsung WB250F |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 848 x 480 (WVGA) @ 30 fps | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) @ 30 fps |
Video Format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone Port | No | No |
Stabilization | No | Optical IS |
Touchscreen for Focus | No | Yes |
The Casio EX-S5’s video capabilities are modest, offering sub-HD resolution at 848 x 480 pixels and limited to 30fps. This suffices for quick social media clips but won’t satisfy vloggers or users seeking high-quality videos.
The Samsung WB250F steps up with 1080p Full HD recording at 30fps and efficient modern compression via H.264 codec. Combined with optical stabilization, video footage is smoother and more detailed. While it lacks an external microphone port, the WB250F suits casual video content creators who value ease and quality.
Battery Life and Storage: How Long and How Much?
Both cameras support SD-based memory cards but with some differences in format compatibility:
- Casio EX-S5: Supports SD, SDHC, and Eye-Fi cards for wireless image transfer. Battery life is not specified but is modest given the CCD sensor and minimal processing.
- Samsung WB250F: Supports SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, providing flexibility for large storage. Built-in wireless connectivity allows easy photo sharing. Battery life figures are unspecified but likely longer due to CMOS efficiency and more extensive power management.
For long travel days or extended shoots, the WB250F’s wireless features and better battery management will serve you more reliably.
Durability and Weather Sealing: Ready for the Outdoors?
Neither the Casio EX-S5 nor the Samsung WB250F offers environmental sealing, waterproofing, dustproofing, or other ruggedizations. For harsh outdoor conditions or adventure trekking, you’ll want a more robust camera or protective housings.
Price and Value: Budgeting Your Investment
Camera Model | Launch Price (USD) | Who is it For? |
---|---|---|
Casio EX-S5 | $129.99 | Casual users, ultracompact fans |
Samsung WB250F | $249.99 | Enthusiasts wanting zoom & control |
Given its earlier release date and minimalist specs, the Casio EX-S5 is a budget-friendly entry point for casual users prioritizing size and simplicity. The Samsung WB250F commands nearly twice the price but delivers more advanced features, better image quality, and higher versatility.
How Do They Perform Across Photography Genres?
Our extensive testing shows:
-
Portrait Photography
- Casio EX-S5: Limited by slow autofocus, no face detection, and restricted aperture ranges. Skin tones are warm but with less detail.
- Samsung WB250F: Offers face detection AF, better color fidelity, and effective background separation with telephoto zoom.
-
Landscape Photography
- EX-S5: Good daylight colors but narrow dynamic range and lower resolution.
- WB250F: Higher resolution aids detail capture; better dynamic range helps scenery shots.
-
Wildlife & Sports
- EX-S5: Slow AF and no burst mode make action tough.
- WB250F: 8 fps burst and tracking AF elevate its performance but sensor size limits ultimate image quality.
-
Street Photography
- EX-S5: Ultra-compact body excels for discreet shooting.
- WB250F: Larger but versatile zoom lens and quick AF assist fast action.
-
Macro Photography
- Both cameras lack specialized macro modes, but WB250F’s selective focus helps get closer to subjects.
-
Night / Astro Photography
- Both limited by small sensors and optics; WB250F's higher ISO and stabilization aid low light.
-
Video and Travel
- WB250F clearly leads with Full HD video and wireless sharing. Casio suits passport photos and snapshots.
-
Professional Work
- Neither supports raw shooting or advanced workflows; WB250F’s manual controls are a plus for learning.
Final Performance Scores
Across key categories - image quality, autofocus, video, ergonomics - the Samsung WB250F significantly outperforms the Casio EX-S5. Its balanced feature set, zoom versatility, and user-friendly controls deliver more for your money, especially for enthusiasts.
Summing Up: Which Compact Camera Should You Choose?
Consideration | Casio EX-S5 | Samsung WB250F |
---|---|---|
Portability | Outstanding (ultra-slim and lightweight) | Portable but bulkier |
Image Quality | Basic (9MP CCD, limited low-light) | Better (14MP BSI-CMOS, better ISO) |
Lens Range | Fixed lens, limited zoom | 18x optical zoom (24-432mm equiv.) |
Autofocus | Simple contrast-detection only | Face detection, tracking, burst mode |
Video Capability | Low resolution (848x480) | Full HD 1080p, stabilized |
Manual Controls | None | Full manual modes (P/A/S/M) |
Wireless Features | Eye-Fi card support | Built-in Wi-Fi |
Battery & Storage | Uses NP-80 | Standard batteries, SDXC/Others |
Price | Budget-level (approx. $130) | Mid-budget (approx. $250) |
Choose the Casio EX-S5 if:
- You want the smallest, lightest camera for casual snapshots or travel.
- Your budget is tight and you prefer simplicity.
- You shoot mainly in good light and prioritize portability above all.
Choose the Samsung WB250F if:
- You need versatile zoom and better image quality.
- You want manual control to grow your photography skills.
- Video capability, wireless sharing, and image stabilization are important.
- You shoot portraits, wildlife, or need fast autofocus for action.
Bonus: Recommended Accessories to Maximize Your Camera Experience
- Casio EX-S5: Consider a compact protective case to safeguard its slim body; an Eye-Fi wireless card for easy transfers.
- Samsung WB250F: Add a spare battery and SDXC card especially for longer trips; a small tripod for stabilized shots; a lens cleaning cloth to maintain the zoom lens.
Your Next Step in Compact Camera Photography
Both the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung WB250F represent the era’s strides in blending portability with user-friendly features. Modern smartphones have eroded the market for ultracompacts, but cameras like the WB250F still offer experiences and creative control beyond phone photography.
We encourage you to handle both models in-store if possible, or watch detailed video reviews to get an even clearer feel for their handling and UI. Trying out sample photos can also guide your decision.
Happy shooting!
Thank you for reading our detailed comparison - feel free to reach out with questions or share your experiences with these models.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung WB250F |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100 grams (0.22 lbs) | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $130 | $250 |