Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
![Casio Exilim EX-S5 front Casio Exilim EX-S5 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-S5/Casio-EX-S5-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB50F front Samsung WB50F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB50F/Samsung-WB50F-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and WB50F (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The EX-S5 was introduced 6 years earlier than the WB50F which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-S5 grades vs the WB50F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S5 and Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S5 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Samsung WB50F
EX-S5 | WB50F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-S5
WB50F | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 60 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung WB50F
EX-S5 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S5 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-S5 vs the WB50F.
![Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S5-vs-Samsung-WB50F-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S5 and WB50F is 97 and 92 respectively.
![Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S5-vs-Samsung-WB50F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions simply by researching specs. The picture here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S5 and WB50F.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB50F to provide you with greater detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged EX-S5 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
![Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S5-vs-Samsung-WB50F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S5-vs-Samsung-WB50F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung WB50F |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100 gr (0.22 lbs) | 207 gr (0.46 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $130 | $180 |