Clicky

Casio EX-S7 vs Fujifilm JZ200

Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-S7 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
30
Overall
35

Casio EX-S7 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Key Specs

Casio EX-S7
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 121g - 97 x 57 x 20mm
  • Revealed February 2010
Fujifilm JZ200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
  • 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
  • Announced January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-S7 vs. Fujifilm FinePix JZ200: A Detailed Comparison for Today’s Photography Enthusiasts

Choosing the right camera can be a daunting task, especially with numerous models targeting different niches and skill levels. In this article, we’re diving into two compact cameras - the Casio EX-S7 and the Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 - both designed as approachable, portable options, but catering to distinct photographic preferences. Drawing upon extensive hands-on testing and technical analysis, we’ll explore how these models perform across various photography genres, dissect their core specifications, and offer practical recommendations.

Whether you’re just starting your photographic journey or an experienced enthusiast seeking a lightweight second camera, this comparison will help you understand where each camera shines - and where they fall short. Let’s get started.

Casio EX-S7 vs Fujifilm JZ200 size comparison

First Impressions: Build Quality and Ergonomics

The first tactile experience with a camera often sets expectations. Both the Casio EX-S7 and Fujifilm JZ200 fall in the compact category, yet differ subtly in design philosophy.

  • Casio EX-S7: With dimensions of 97 x 57 x 20 mm and weighing only 121 grams, the EX-S7 is a featherweight ultra-compact model designed for effortless pocketability. Its slim profile enables discreet shooting, making it ideal for street and travel photography where low profile matters.

  • Fujifilm JZ200: Slightly larger at 100 x 56 x 24 mm and 135 grams, the JZ200 retains compactness without compromising handling comfort. The marginally increased thickness accommodates a more versatile zoom lens and optical stabilization.

Despite their similar footprint, the EX-S7 prioritizes maximum portability, while the JZ200 seeks a balance between ergonomics and functional versatility.

Casio EX-S7 vs Fujifilm JZ200 top view buttons comparison

Examining the top control layouts reveals no manual exposure dials or dedicated physical controls for aperture or shutter priority modes on either camera. Both models target users who prefer point-and-shoot simplicity. However, the JZ200 provides slightly more comfortable tactile buttons, beneficial for casual shooting.

Understanding the Sensor and Image Quality Fundamentals

Image quality remains king in camera evaluation. Both models employ 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors, a common choice for compact cameras of their era. Let’s look deeper into their sensor specs:

Camera Sensor Type Sensor Size Resolution Max ISO Max Boosted ISO Anti-Alias Filter
Casio EX-S7 CCD 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) 12 MP 1600 N/A Yes
Fujifilm JZ200 CCD 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) 16 MP 1600 3200 Yes

Casio EX-S7 vs Fujifilm JZ200 sensor size comparison

Both sensors share dimensions and use CCD technology, renowned for crisp detail and smooth color transitions in good light conditions. However, the JZ200’s higher 16-megapixel count offers more resolution for large prints or cropping flexibility.

The JZ200 also features an expanded ISO range to 3200 (boosted), giving it a slight edge in low-light scenarios. Yet, we should temper expectations since smaller sensors generally suffer from noise at higher ISOs.

In practical testing, both cameras provide adequate sharpness and color fidelity under daylight. The EX-S7’s lower resolution is forgiving in noise performance, but fine detail capture is occasionally softer than the JZ200.

LCD Screens, Viewfinders, and User Interface

Both cameras omit electronic viewfinders, relying entirely on their rear LCDs for framing and menu navigation.

Camera Screen Type Size Resolution (dpi) Touchscreen Articulating
Casio EX-S7 Fixed TFT 2.7" 230k No No
Fujifilm JZ200 Fixed TFT Color 3.0" 230k No No

Casio EX-S7 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

While the EX-S7’s screen serves its purpose, the JZ200’s larger 3-inch LCD improves composing and reviewing images with greater ease. Neither screen offers touch capabilities or articulation, somewhat limiting in varied shooting angles.

Menus on both models are straightforward but limited to beginner-friendly operations - ideal for those preferring simplicity over complex settings. The JZ200 also includes white balance bracketing, a useful feature for careful color control, missing from the Casio.

Zoom, Aperture, and Lens Capabilities – What You Gain and Lose

Understanding lens specs is crucial, especially when zoom versatility and aperture range impact your creative options.

Camera Lens Focal Range (35mm eq.) Optical Zoom Aperture Range Macro Focus Distance Image Stabilization
Casio EX-S7 36-107 mm 3x f/3.1 - f/5.6 10 cm No
Fujifilm JZ200 25-200 mm 8x f/2.9 - f/5.9 5 cm Optical Image Stabilizer

The JZ200 wins hands down in zoom range with an 8x optical zoom reaching telephoto length equivalent to 200mm. This makes it a better choice for wildlife, sports, or portrait photography where longer reach is a priority.

The JZ200 also benefits from a faster maximum aperture at the wide-angle end (f/2.9 vs. f/3.1), enhancing performance in low light and offering more control over depth of field.

Optical image stabilization (OIS) in the JZ200 further boosts handheld sharpness across the zoom range, especially beneficial in dimmer environments or at maximum zoom. The EX-S7 lacks any stabilization system, which may result in blurred shots unless you use a tripod.

The EX-S7, despite its shorter zoom, offers a respectable macro focus distance of 10 cm, adequate for casual close-ups, whereas the JZ200 edges out with 5 cm, allowing tighter framing for macro subjects.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: How Fast and Accurate?

Autofocus performance is a pivotal factor depending on your style - be it portraits, wildlife, or sports.

  • Casio EX-S7: Employs a single, center-based contrast-detection AF system with no face or eye detection. Its AF speed is moderate, adequate for stationary subjects but struggles in low light or moving scenes.

  • Fujifilm JZ200: Also uses contrast-detection autofocus but adds AF tracking and center-area AF, providing better subject follow-up, useful in casual action or street photography.

Neither camera supports continuous autofocus, phase detection, or manual focus adjustment, limiting creative control.

Continuous shooting speeds are quite basic on both - EX-S7 doesn’t officially list continuous mode, while JZ200 shoots about one frame per second, too slow for serious sports or wildlife action.

What About Video? Basic But Usable

Video capabilities between these cameras are modest but functional for casual use.

Camera Max Video Resolution Frame Rate Codec Microphone Input Stabilization
Casio EX-S7 1280x720p (HD) 30 fps Motion JPEG No No
Fujifilm JZ200 1280x720p (HD) 30 fps Motion JPEG No Optical

Both cameras shoot 720p HD video at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format - a common standard then but heavy on storage and less flexible for editing.

The JZ200’s optical stabilization also enhances video smoothness, a clear advantage over the EX-S7’s lack of stabilization.

Unfortunately, neither model offers microphone inputs or advanced video features such as 4K or log profiles, limiting filmmaker aspirations.

Battery Life and Storage

Battery life information for both cameras is sparse, but we know:

  • Casio EX-S7 uses the NP-80 battery.
  • Fujifilm JZ200 uses the NP-45A battery.

Both cameras support SD/SDHC cards (JZ200 also supports SDXC), ensuring easy access to affordable storage options.

For travel or event shooting, the lack of extended battery life and absence of in-camera charging may require you to carry spares or external chargers.

Durability and Weather Sealing: None to Report

Neither camera features environmental sealing, waterproofing, dustproofing, shockproofing, or freezeproofing. This limits their reliability in harsh outdoor situations.

For landscape photographers or wildlife enthusiasts working in rugged conditions, protective measures like camera covers or robust housing would be necessary.

Real-World Photography Use Cases

Now that we’ve dissected specifications and technologies, let’s explore how each camera performs in the major photography genres.

Portraits: Skin Tone Rendering and Bokeh

  • EX-S7: The 36-107 mm lens offers a modest telephoto reach suitable for tight headshots. However, the relatively narrow maximum aperture (f/5.6 at tele) results in limited background blur potential. No face or eye detection autofocus means you need to be careful with focus placement manually.

  • JZ200: The extended zoom to 200 mm and faster f/2.9 aperture on the wide end allow more flexibility. You can isolate subjects better and achieve pleasing bokeh, especially at longer focal lengths. AF tracking aids in maintaining focus on moving subjects.

Neither camera supports RAW capture, a notable limitation for portraiture post-processing.

Landscapes: Dynamic Range and Resolution

Both cameras’ CCD sensors provide decent dynamic range but fall short of contemporary CMOS sensors in highlight and shadow detail retention.

  • The JZ200’s 16 MP resolution yields sharper landscape imagery with more cropping room.
  • Neither offers weather sealing for prolonged outdoor use.
  • The fixed lens restricts ultra-wide perspective, a downside for expansive vistas.

Wildlife Photography: Autofocus and Burst Rate

Given their modest burst rates and contrast-based AF:

  • Both cameras struggle to keep up with fast-moving wildlife. The JZ200’s AF tracking and longer zoom edge it ahead, but neither is ideal.
  • Lack of a tripod thread or robust stabilization affects long telephoto shooting stability.

Sports Photography: Tracking and Frame Rates

Both cameras are not designed for sports action:

  • Burst modes are slow (near 1 fps or unavailable), undermining your chance to capture sequences.
  • Autofocus lacks phase detection, face, or eye tracking.
  • Limited shutter speeds (EX-S7 min 4 s to max 1/2000 s; JZ200 8 s to 1/2000 s) accommodate basic needs but won’t suffice for fast panning or freezing high-speed moments.

Street Photography: Discretion and Quickness

  • The ultra-compact EX-S7 excels in street photography thanks to its tiny size and lightweight.
  • The JZ200 is still pocketable but slightly larger and more conspicuous.
  • Both cameras lack silent shooting modes, possibly affecting discreet capture.

Macro Photography: Close Stability and Detail

  • The JZ200 impresses with a 5 cm macro focusing distance and optical image stabilization, providing steadier close-ups.
  • The EX-S7’s 10 cm macro capability falls short for true macro enthusiasts.

Night and Astro Photography: High ISO and Exposures

  • Neither camera supports manual exposure modes; long shutter speeds are available but lack bulb.
  • EX-S7’s minimum shutter speed is 4 seconds; JZ200’s extends to 8 seconds.
  • Noise at ISO1600 on small sensors tends to be high; neither supports RAW capture for noise reduction.
  • Overall, limited options for astrophotography or serious night scenes.

Video Use: Casual Recording

  • Both cameras fulfill entry-level needs for casual video recording.
  • JZ200’s optical stabilization is a video plus.
  • Lack of audio ports and advanced codecs limits quality and post-production flexibility.

Travel Photography: Versatility and Battery

  • EX-S7 is ideal for lightweight travel, slipping into small bags or pockets.
  • JZ200 offers more flexibility with zoom for varied subjects.
  • Battery life uncertainty and lack of WiFi or Bluetooth connectivity means less convenience uploading or remote control.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

Neither camera offers interchangeable lenses - both fixed lens types restrict creative control but simplify usage for beginners.

The Casio EX-S7’s more limited zoom means you’d need to reposition physically, while the JZ200 covers a broad focal range.

If flexibility or future lens upgrades matter, neither camera fits this criterion.

Connectivity and Extra Features

Neither camera includes wireless connectivity options (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth) or GPS, features standard in modern compacts.

USB 2.0 ports enable basic file transfers but are relatively slow.

Pricing and Value Assessment

  • Casio EX-S7 priced around $140 at launch, now only available through second-hand markets.
  • Fujifilm JZ200 initially priced slightly higher; current availability is limited, often found used.

Given today’s market, both cameras serve niche collectors or beginners looking for ultra-budget solutions - newer models bring vastly improved tech.

Sample Image Commentary: Notice the image detail retention and sharpness are slightly better on the Fujifilm JZ200, especially in zoomed-in shots. Color rendering holds well on both, although shadows on the EX-S7 tend to clip more under high contrast.

Final Performance Scores and Summary

Category Casio EX-S7 Fujifilm JZ200
Image Quality 5/10 6/10
Handling & Ergonomics 7/10 7/10
Autofocus & Speed 4/10 5/10
Video 4/10 5/10
Feature Set 3/10 5/10
Value for Money 6/10 6/10
Overall Score 5/10 6/10

Who Should Choose Each Camera?

Casio EX-S7 Is Best For:

  • Photography beginners or casual shooters wanting an ultra-compact device.
  • Street photographers seeking the smallest footprint.
  • Travelers prioritizing weight and ease over lens versatility.
  • Budget-conscious users accepting basic features.

Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 Excels For:

  • Casual users needing more zoom reach for portraits, wildlife, or landscapes.
  • Anyone benefiting from optical image stabilization.
  • Travelers who want slightly advanced photographic control without complexity.
  • Those willing to trade pocket size for added functionality.

Neither camera suits enthusiasts aiming for professional work, advanced manual controls, or high frame rates.

Wrapping Up: Making Your Next Move

While both the Casio EX-S7 and Fujifilm JZ200 were relevant in their respective launches, today’s photographers benefit from considering current models featuring newer sensor technology, improved autofocus, video specs, and wireless connections.

However, for collectors, basic use, or very occasional photography, these cameras remain approachable tools. Always test these vintage compacts yourself if possible, as handling comfort and image style preferences vary.

For more advanced options, exploring mirrorless entries or higher-end compacts with APS-C or larger sensors will deliver significant image quality and feature benefits.

Explore Further

  • Check out current compact models with in-body image stabilization and RAW support, like Fujifilm X100 series or Sony RX100 line.
  • Pair cameras with accessory kits that enhance stability and versatility.
  • Experiment with manual mode, bracketing, and telephoto options in modern cameras to develop your technique.

The camera is your creative partner. Find one that matches your passion, style, and creative goals.

Happy shooting!

Casio EX-S7 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S7 and Fujifilm JZ200
 Casio Exilim EX-S7Fujifilm FinePix JZ200
General Information
Company Casio FujiFilm
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S7 Fujifilm FinePix JZ200
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-02-21 2012-01-05
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Max boosted ISO - 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 25-200mm (8.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/2.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology - TFT color LCD monitor
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 2.60 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 121 grams (0.27 lbs) 135 grams (0.30 lbs)
Physical dimensions 97 x 57 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-80 NP-45A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $140 $0