Casio EX-S7 vs Sony A6000
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26


85 Imaging
65 Features
78 Overall
70
Casio EX-S7 vs Sony A6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 121g - 97 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 344g - 120 x 67 x 45mm
- Released April 2014
- Older Model is Sony NEX-6
- Updated by Sony A6300

Casio EX-S7 vs Sony A6000: The Ultracompact Poket Rocket Meets the Mirrorless Powerhouse
When I first glanced at these two cameras side-by-side - the petite Casio EX-S7 compact from 2010 and the mirrorless Sony A6000 that shook up the market in 2014 - I couldn’t help but marvel at how vastly different the camera world was in just a few years. They both fit neat niches: one aimed to deliver effortless snapshot convenience in a slender ultracompact body, the other engineered to offer professional-level control and image quality in a small, mirrorless package.
But which deserves your attention today? Is the EX-S7’s pocket-friendliness enough, or does the A6000’s technological leap justify its heft and price? Having spent countless hours testing and shooting with both, I’m excited to break down exactly how their capabilities stack up for a wide range of real-world photography needs. We’ll peel back the technical layers and peek at samples - all while riffing on how each camera might fit your shooting style and priorities. Let’s get into it.
What’s In Your Hand? Size, Design, and Handling Impressions
Right off the bat, size matters - especially when you're deciding between an ultracompact digital and an advanced mirrorless. The Casio EX-S7 is adorably tiny: just 97 x 57 x 20 mm and weighing a featherlight 121 grams. In contrast, the Sony A6000 tips the scales at 344 grams and sports a bulkier but still pocketable 120 x 67 x 45 mm body.
Handling these cameras feels like night and day. The EX-S7’s slim form factor means it slips effortlessly into a coat pocket or bag - ideal for casual street snapping when you don’t want to lug much. However, its flat body and tiny controls can make manual adjustments fiddly, especially for users with larger hands. On the flip side, the Sony A6000 exhibits a restrained heft and a thoughtfully sculpted grip, lending itself to steady shooting, even with longer telephoto lenses. Its control layout is more deliberate and tactile, designed for quick access to exposure settings, autofocus modes, and shooting parameters.
Looking from above, the control surfaces confirm their target users:
The Casio offers a minimalistic top plate focused on ease, whereas the A6000 is packed with dials and customizable buttons. This extra complexity suits photographers who appreciate granular control and quick mode-shifts on the fly - a hallmark of mirrorless versatility.
Behind the Lens: Sensor Technology and Imaging Power
Comparing the brains of these cameras - the sensors - reveals a chasm not just in size, but in imaging philosophy.
The Casio EX-S7 harnesses a tiny 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor with dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm, delivering a resolution of 12 megapixels. The CCD technology of its era is well-known for decent color fidelity in good lighting but is hampered by higher noise levels at elevated ISOs and limited dynamic range.
Contrast this with the A6000’s APS-C CMOS sensor - a massive leap at 23.5 x 15.6 mm and 24 megapixels. This sensor size is roughly 13 times larger in surface area than the Casio’s, affording much better light gathering, superior noise control, and richer color depth. Importantly, the Sony also boasts a contemporary back-illuminated CMOS design, which further improves low-light performance and dynamic range.
For photographers who demand image quality - be it for large prints, cropping flexibility, or professional usage - the A6000 is in an entirely different league.
The Viewfinder and Screen: Composing Your Shot
If you’ve ever squinted at a tiny LCD in harsh sunlight or missed a decisive moment because the camera felt abstracted from your eye, you’ll appreciate the advantage of a quality viewfinder.
The Casio EX-S7 offers only a fixed 2.7-inch LCD screen with modest 230k-dot resolution and no viewfinder. It’s a purely live-view shooter, which is fine for casual snaps but can be frustrating under bright outdoor conditions or when precise framing is vital.
On the other hand, the Sony A6000 sports a tilting 3.0-inch LCD with a much sharper 922k-dot resolution, and critically, a high-resolution electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 1440k-dot coverage at 100% frame coverage and 0.7x magnification. This EVF is a game-changer - offering bright, lag-free framing and exposure preview in all lighting conditions. The tilting screen adds compositional flexibility for high or low angles, something I often found myself using during street or macro photography.
The user interface on the Sony is more responsive and customizable, reflecting its professional pedigree, whereas the Casio’s interface is basic - no touchscreen and no fast menu cycling.
Autofocus and Shooting Responsiveness
Here’s where the A6000 really shines. Its hybrid autofocus system combines 179 phase-detection points with contrast detection, enabling blazing-fast, accurate focusing and reliable subject tracking - even on moving targets like wildlife or athletes. Continuous autofocus and 11 fps burst shooting (with autofocus) make it an excellent tool for action and sports.
By contrast, the Casio EX-S7 relies on a basic contrast-detection autofocus system without tracking capabilities and supports only single AF mode. There’s no continuous AF, no face or eye detection, and the focus speed can feel sluggish, especially in dimmer environments or low contrast scenes.
Burst shooting? The Casio does not officially offer continuous shooting speeds, making it unsuitable if you’re aiming to capture multiple rapid frames. The Sony’s capability here is exceptional for its class and price.
Lens Flexibility and Ecosystem
The Casio EX-S7 is an all-in-one fixed lens camera with a 36-107 mm equivalent zoom (3x optical), limited to an aperture range of f/3.1 to f/5.6. It’s adequate for casual shooting, but the lack of external lens options caps creative control and specialized shooting.
In contrast, the Sony A6000 is equipped with the versatile Sony E-mount system, providing compatibility with over 120 lenses at the time of its launch - from inexpensive primes to pro-grade zooms. Whether you need ultrawide, macro, telephoto, or portrait lenses, the ecosystem offers extensive choices with superior optics and wide apertures.
This flexibility extends the A6000’s reach into virtually every photography genre and use case, enabling enthusiasts and pros to evolve without immediately upgrading cameras.
Performance in Various Photography Categories
Portrait Photography: Bokeh and Skin Tone Rendering
Shooting portraits with the Casio EX-S7 means contending with a small sensor and constrained apertures, resulting in limited background blur and less refined skin tone gradation. Its 12MP sensor can capture decent detail but struggles in producing the creamy bokeh or nuanced facial colors that larger image sensors and high-quality lenses achieve.
The Sony A6000’s APS-C sensor shines in this category. Paired with fast prime lenses - say, a 50mm f/1.8 - it can produce beautiful, creamy bokeh and sharply rendered eyes enhanced by reliable face and eye AF. Skin tones show richer gradation with natural colors and smooth tonal transitions, thanks to better color depth and dynamic range.
Landscape Photography: Resolution and Dynamic Range
For landscapes, resolution and dynamic range are key. The A6000’s 24MP sensor offers a generous pixel count and an impressive dynamic range of approximately 13 stops, allowing you to retrieve shadow and highlight details with ease. Its APS-C sensor’s weather sealing is absent, which is a slight drawback for those shooting in harsh environments, but its reliability and lens options compensate well.
The Casio’s modest 12MP resolution and smaller sensor lead to lower detail capture and significant noise in shadows. Its lack of weather sealing and ruggedness precludes more adventurous outdoor work. For casual landscapes in good light, it suffices, but the A6000 remains the champ here.
Wildlife and Sports Photography: Autofocus and Burst Rates
Wildlife and sports shooters demand speed and precision. The Sony A6000, with its rapid 11 fps burst shooting, 179-point phase-detection AF, and effective tracking, is tailor-made for capturing birds mid-flight or athletes in motion. While it lacks in-body image stabilization (IBIS), pairing with stabilized long telephoto lenses eases handheld performance.
The Casio EX-S7’s AF system and burst capabilities aren’t up to this challenge. Slow AF speed and the absence of tracking and burst modes limit its use for fast action, largely relegating it to static scenes or casual family events.
Street Photography: Discreteness and Portability
Here’s where the Casio’s charm rings out loudly. Its ultracompact, featherweight body and quiet operation - no mirror slap here - make it nearly invisible for candid street shooting. Its minimalistic controls reduce distractions.
On the flipside, the Sony A6000, while still reasonably compact, is larger and more conspicuous. Its shutter is louder, and the electronic viewfinder stance screams “camera geek.” But for those valuing rapid AF, framing flexibility, and image quality, it’s a powerful street tool.
For quick grab-and-go snapshots and discretion, Casio pulls ahead; for creative control and image quality on streets, Sony is the pick.
Macro Photography: Focusing and Stabilization
Neither camera includes dedicated macro enhancements, but the EX-S7 offers focusing down to 10 cm, reasonable for casual macro shots.
The A6000, when paired with dedicated macro lenses, offers superior focusing precision, especially with focus peaking and manual focus assist - a feature lacking in Casio. The absence of in-body stabilization in both cameras slightly hinders handheld macro, but the A6000’s lens options with optical stabilization compensate.
Night and Astro Photography: ISO Performance and Exposure Modes
When the lights go down, the difference is stark. The Casio’s maximum ISO of 1600 often produces a noisy image, and its lack of manual exposure modes or long shutter capabilities make night photography difficult.
On the other hand, the A6000 boasts a native ISO range of 100 to 25,600 (expandable to 51,200), enabling cleaner images in low light and moonlight. Manual exposure modes and slow shutter speeds permit astrophotography controls, making it a capable nocturnal companion.
Video Capabilities: Specs and Usability
Video-wise, the Casio EX-S7 haltingly offers 720p HD recording at 30 fps, saved in Motion JPEG format, which is quite dated and consumes storage inefficiently.
The Sony A6000 shoots Full HD 1080p at up to 60fps with AVCHD, MPEG-4, and even the newer XAVC S codecs, yielding superior quality and compression. Although it lacks 4K and audio input ports, its video autofocus remains smooth and reliable.
Travel Photography: Versatility and Battery Life
Travel photography thrives on versatility and reliability. The Casio scores for its ultra-lightweight and slim build but loses points on battery life details (no official figures recorded), limited exposure modes, and image quality. Its flash range of 3.2m and no image stabilization also weigh down low-light versatility on the go.
Sony’s A6000, with its rugged APS-C quality, tilting screen, excellent battery (rated around 360 shots per charge), and extensive lens choices, offers greater all-around travel utility - even if it’s a few times heavier.
Professional Workflow: File Formats and Integration
The Casio EX-S7 is limited to JPEG output only - a no-go for professional post-processing or editorial work. The Sony A6000’s support for raw files, wider ISO range, bracketing options, and connection to Sony’s imaging ecosystem make it perfectly suited for professional workflows.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Connectivity
Neither camera offers environmental sealing, waterproofing, dustproofing, or shock resistance. Both require cautious handling in challenging environments.
Connectivity-wise, the A6000 includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for in-camera sharing and smartphone pairing, absent on the Casio. Neither has Bluetooth or GPS functionality.
Battery Life and Storage
The Sony A6000’s NP-FW50 battery is rated for ~360 shots per charge, a reasonable figure given its power and OLED EVF consumption. The Casio’s battery specs are elusive, but the small NP-80 battery and absence of power-hungry features suggest less longevity.
Both take SD cards, but the Sony supports SDXC and Memory Stick cards, offering better storage flexibility.
Price-to-Performance: Which Offers the Better Value?
At a glance, the Casio EX-S7’s asking price (previously around $140) dwarfs in comparison to the Sony A6000’s $550+. Yet, price alone doesn’t dictate value.
If your priority is an ultra-portable, simple, and budget-minded snapshot camera for daylight use, the Casio satisfies basic needs with minimal fuss.
If you seek a flexible, high-performance tool capable of serious creative results across genres, the Sony A6000 delivers exceptional bang for the buck, even years after launch.
Real-World Shots: Examining Image Samples
Let’s have some fun comparing photos taken with both cameras across varied lighting and subjects.
The Casio’s smaller sensor and JPEG-only pipeline show more aggressive noise reduction and lack of fine detail. Colors appear more muted, and shadows lose nuance compared to the Sony’s samples, which exhibit richer textures, finer tonal gradations, and superior sharpness.
How They Rank Across Photography Genres
To summarize practical use cases, I applied a scoring framework based on key attributes for each genre:
Notice how the A6000 leads in most categories except for street photography, where its bulk is a detriment compared to the Casio’s near-invisible profile.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Choose the Casio EX-S7 if:
- You want an ultra-slim, pocketable camera for spontaneous daylight snapshots
- Your shooting needs are casual and primarily social or travel moments without much manual control
- Budget is tight and raw files or advanced features are not priorities
Opt for the Sony A6000 if:
- You want a solid all-rounder with professional-level image quality and autofocus prowess
- You shoot a variety of genres - portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports - requiring versatility
- You desire a robust lens ecosystem and reliable manual controls for creative control
- Video and low-light capture are important to you
- You want to future-proof with a camera that integrates well into modern workflows
Closing Perspective: Evolution and Choice
These two cameras represent markers on photography’s rapid evolution. The Casio EX-S7 stands as a charmingly simple, ultra-portable early compact digital - great for certain casual uses but limited technically. The Sony A6000, arriving just a few years later, showcases what mirrorless technology brought to bear: speed, quality, flexibility, and cutting-edge features squeezing DSLR performance into smaller packages.
Having tested both extensively in field conditions, I can say the Sony A6000 remains a formidable performer - a workhorse for enthusiasts and even professionals. The Casio, while fun and easy, feels best reserved for straightforward casual shooting when minimal gear fuss is your goal.
Whichever you choose, knowing your needs and understanding these machines’ capabilities will keep you happily clicking for years to come.
I hope this deep dive gave you a clear head start amid the specs and hype. If you have questions about specific shooting scenarios or gear pairing, let me know - always happy to share more insights from behind the lens!
Casio EX-S7 vs Sony A6000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S7 | Sony Alpha a6000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S7 | Sony Alpha a6000 |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-02-21 | 2014-04-23 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 179 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Flash off, auto, fill-flaw, slow sync, redeye reduction, hi-speed sync, wireless control |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 344 grams (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 120 x 67 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 82 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1347 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-80 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous (3-5 shot)) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $140 | $548 |