Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS60
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
88 Imaging
44 Features
63 Overall
51
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS60 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 282g - 112 x 64 x 38mm
- Launched January 2016
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ80
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS50
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS70
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS60 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS60, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the ZS60 (18MP) is fairly similar but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and ZS60 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe E-PL9 was revealed 2 years later than the ZS60 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS60 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-PL9 grades versus the ZS60 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS60 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Panasonic ZS60 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic ZS60
E-PL9 | ZS60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | January 2016 | More recent by 26 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS60 over the Olympus E-PL9
ZS60 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic ZS60
E-PL9 | ZS60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1040k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS60 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL9 features outer dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS60 has specifications of 112mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 282 grams (0.62 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS60 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL9 against the ZS60.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and ZS60 is 85 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS60 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading specs. The visual underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and ZS60.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic ZS60 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-PL9 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS60 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS60 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ80 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2018-02-08 | 2016-01-05 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 5.60 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lb) | 282 grams (0.62 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 112 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 109 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 320 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $599 | $248 |