Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M381
Portability
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M381 Key Specs
Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Kodak M381
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
- Introduced July 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M381 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Kodak M381, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the M381 (12MP) is fairly well matched and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-Z2000 was released 6 months later than the M381 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z2000 matches up against the M381 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M381 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Kodak EasyShare M381. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Kodak M381 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Kodak M381
| EX-Z2000 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| M381 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Kodak M381
| EX-Z2000 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | July 2009 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M381 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 offers exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Kodak M381 has specifications of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Kodak M381 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the M381.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and M381 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M381 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking a spec sheet. The visual underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and M381.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-Z2000 to give more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M381 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Portrait photography with Kodak M381
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Street photography info
Kodak M381 Street photography info
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competition in class (152g)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (153g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography info
Kodak M381 Sports photography info
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography highlights
Kodak M381 Travel photography highlights
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (152g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (153 grams)
megapixel count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Landscape photography details
Kodak M381 Landscape photography details
manual focus
pretty wide (26mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging factors
Kodak M381 Vlogging factors
pretty wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
no external mic port
heavier than competition in class (152g)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
missing microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (153g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M381 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Kodak EasyShare M381 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Kodak EasyShare M381 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2009-07-29 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.0-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 153 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $0 | $170 |
