Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S6400
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 150g - 95 x 58 x 27mm
- Released August 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S6400 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S6400, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Nikon. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the S6400 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was unveiled 3 years prior to the S6400 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z2000 grades vs the S6400 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S6400 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Nikon Coolpix S6400. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Nikon S6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Nikon S6400
| EX-Z2000 | S6400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6400 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| S6400 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 31 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Nikon S6400
| EX-Z2000 | S6400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S6400 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Nikon S6400 has measurements of 95mm x 58mm x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S6400 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the S6400.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and S6400 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S6400 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and S6400.
Clearly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Nikon S6400 to deliver greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S6400 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S6400 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Nikon Coolpix S6400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Nikon Coolpix S6400 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2012-08-22 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.1-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 150 gr (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 95 x 58 x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 160 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $0 | $500 |