Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung CL5
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL10
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung CL5, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z2000 was unveiled 11 months after the CL5 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the CL5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung CL5. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung CL5
| EX-Z2000 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 11 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| CL5 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung CL5
| EX-Z2000 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 has got exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung CL5 has sizing of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung CL5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the CL5.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and CL5 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The image here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and CL5.
As you can tell, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z2000 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Casio EX-Z2000 will give extra detail having an extra 5MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-Z2000 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung CL5 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL10 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 141 gr (0.31 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $391 |