Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Released August 2012
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z270 versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and Galaxy Camera 4G (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z270 was introduced 4 years earlier than the Galaxy Camera 4G and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-Z270 scores against the Galaxy Camera 4G in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
EX-Z270 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 115k | 0k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Casio EX-Z270
Galaxy Camera 4G | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2012 | January 2009 | Fresher by 44 months | |
Display dimensions | 4.8" | 2.7" | Larger display (+2.1") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
EX-Z270 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z270 provides outside dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has sizing of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") along with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z270 versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z270 vs the Galaxy Camera 4G.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and Galaxy Camera 4G is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z270 and Galaxy Camera 4G.
Clearly, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z270 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G will give more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | - |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | - |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 4.8 inches |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 111 grams (0.24 lbs) | 305 grams (0.67 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $0 | $550 |