Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL350
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Also referred to as WB2000
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL350, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and TL350 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z270 was launched 13 months prior to the TL350 which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-Z270 matches up versus the TL350 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Samsung TL350. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung TL350
EX-Z270 | TL350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Casio EX-Z270
TL350 | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 13 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 115k | Clearer screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung TL350
EX-Z270 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z270 comes with exterior dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL350 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z270 against the TL350.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and TL350 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z270 and TL350.
Clearly, both of the cameras have the same megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 features the tinier sensor which should make obtaining bokeh more difficult. The more aged EX-Z270 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung TL350 |
Also called | - | WB2000 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.20 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 111 grams (0.24 lbs) | 195 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $0 | $400 |