Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB150F
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012

Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB150F: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing the right compact camera can be surprisingly complex, even with straightforward specs. Each model brings a unique blend of technology, user experience, and creative possibility. Today, we dive deep into two small sensor compacts - the Casio EX-Z280 and the Samsung WB150F - both aimed at casual shooters and enthusiasts who want simple, versatile cameras without the bulk of DSLRs or mirrorless systems.
With over a decade separating their announcement dates (2009 vs. 2012), these cameras represent different moments in compact camera evolution. We’ve spent hours testing and dissecting their image quality, autofocus, ergonomics, and feature sets to help you find the best fit for your photography style and budget.
Let’s walk through their strengths, limitations, and use-case suitability in a clear, structured way so you can confidently decide which camera deserves a place in your kit.
Understanding Their Physical Presence: Size, Handling, and Controls
First impressions matter, especially when you’re carrying a camera all day. Both the Casio EX-Z280 and Samsung WB150F are pocketable compacts, but slight size and weight differences affect comfort and handling.
- Casio EX-Z280 Dimensions: 97 × 53 × 20 mm | Weight: 133 g
- Samsung WB150F Dimensions: 107 × 61 × 23 mm | Weight: 188 g
What does this mean for you?
- The Casio is noticeably lighter and slimmer, making it ultra-portable - ideal if you want to travel light or slip your camera into a jacket pocket.
- The Samsung adds heft and bulk, which might feel more substantial in hand and could aid stability during longer shoots. It also offers a larger grip area, potentially benefiting those who prioritize comfortable ergonomics over outright size.
Taking a closer look at the top control layouts provides insight into user interaction and shooting efficiency.
You’ll see the Samsung offers more manual control options on the top plate - including dedicated dials and buttons for shutter priority, aperture priority, and exposure compensation - allowing you to experiment more creatively and react faster in changing shooting conditions.
The Casio, on the other hand, keeps things extremely simple with a minimalistic control set suited for new users or point-and-shoot reliability.
Sensor Insights and Image Quality: What Does the Heart of the Camera Offer?
Both cameras feature 1/2.3" CCD sensors, a common choice for compact cameras of their era, but they differ in resolution and spectral response.
Feature | Casio EX-Z280 | Samsung WB150F |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor Resolution | 12 MP (4000 x 3000) | 14 MP (4608 x 3456) |
Max ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Antialias Filter | Yes | Yes |
Technical Takeaway
- The Samsung’s slightly higher resolution (14 MP vs. 12 MP) could provide sharper images and more cropping flexibility, especially if you print larger or do detailed post-processing.
- Aside from sheer megapixels, the Samsung offers better ISO handling and face detection, potentially enhancing image quality in low light and portrait settings.
- Both cameras are hamstrung by their relatively small CCD sensors, which impact dynamic range and noise performance - an inherent limitation in small sensor compacts.
The Viewfinder and Screen Experience: Composing and Reviewing Your Shots
Neither camera includes an electronic or optical viewfinder, pushing you to rely on their LCD screens.
Specification | Casio EX-Z280 | Samsung WB150F |
---|---|---|
Screen Size | 2.7” Fixed Type | 3.0” TFT LCD Fixed Type |
Screen Resolution | 115k dots | 460k dots |
Touchscreen | No | No |
Articulating Screen | No | No |
Real-World Observations
- The Samsung’s larger, higher resolution screen means you get a much clearer preview of your shots and menus. This is a major plus when reviewing focus, composition, or video in bright daylight.
- The Casio’s smaller, low-res screen feels less sharp, which can make checking fine details or navigating menus sluggish.
- Neither model sports touchscreen functionality, so you’ll rely on physical buttons, which are tactile and straightforward but lack the speed of touch navigation.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Flexibility vs. Simplicity
Your lens defines your photographic reach. Both are fixed lens compacts but with very different zoom ranges.
Feature | Casio EX-Z280 | Samsung WB150F |
---|---|---|
Focal Length (35mm equiv.) | 26-104 mm (4x zoom) | 24-432 mm (18x superzoom) |
Maximum Aperture | f/2.6–5.9 | f/3.2–5.8 |
Macro Focus Range | 5 cm | 5 cm |
Image Stabilization | No | Yes (Optical) |
What This Means For Your Photography
- The Samsung’s superzoom (18x vs 4x) vastly outperforms the Casio in reach, making it far more versatile for landscapes, wildlife, and event shooting where getting closer matters.
- The Casio’s lens is faster (wider aperture at f/2.6 at wide), which provides a brighter viewfinder image and better low light performance at the wide end, though the difference is narrow.
- Lack of optical stabilization on the Casio is a notable disadvantage, particularly at telephoto zooms and lower shutter speeds where image blur from handshake increases.
For users interested in macro photography, both offer a close-focus distance of around 5cm, standard for compacts but not on par with dedicated macro lenses.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Moment
Fast, reliable autofocus is vital for every type of photography, from portraits to sports.
Feature | Casio EX-Z280 | Samsung WB150F |
---|---|---|
Autofocus Type | Contrast Detection | Contrast Detection |
Face Detection | No | Yes |
AF Points | Single-point | Multi-area and face detection |
Continuous Shooting | N/A | 10 fps |
Hands-On Autofocus Impressions
- The Casio offers basic single-point contrast detection autofocus, sufficient for casual shooting but prone to hunting and slower in challenging light.
- Samsung improves focus accuracy with face detection and multiple AF areas, better for portraits and moving subjects.
- The Samsung’s 10 fps burst mode is a huge advantage for wildlife and sports, allowing you to capture fast action sequences, whereas the Casio lacks continuous shooting altogether.
For serious action or wildlife photographers on a budget, the Samsung clearly outpaces the Casio here - underscoring its push toward enthusiast users.
Image Stabilization and Exposure Control: Enhancing Sharpness and Creativity
Optical image stabilization (OIS) helps prevent blur in low light or at zoomed focal lengths.
- The Samsung model includes OIS, a big plus if you often shoot handheld in dim conditions or at full zoom.
- The Casio EX-Z280 lacks any image stabilization, which limits sharpness unless you use a tripod or fast shutter speeds.
Exposure modes give you control over how much light you let in, important for artistic expression.
Feature | Casio EX-Z280 | Samsung WB150F |
---|---|---|
Manual Exposure Modes | None | Yes (Shutter & Aperture Priority, Full Manual) |
Exposure Compensation | No | Yes |
White Balance | Custom available | Custom + Bracketing |
This is a crucial difference: Samsung offers shutter and aperture priority plus manual exposure, allowing you to tailor settings creatively, while the Casio is fully auto with no manual override, catering to casual shooters who favor simplicity.
Video Capabilities: Casual Clips or Vlogging?
Both cameras shoot HD video but with different codecs and frame rates.
Feature | Casio EX-Z280 | Samsung WB150F |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1280 x 720 (Motion JPEG, 30fps) | 1280 x 720 (MPEG-4, H.264, 30fps) |
Microphone Input | No | No |
Headphone Output | No | No |
Video Stabilization | No | Yes (Optical) |
Samsung’s more efficient video codec (H.264) means smaller file sizes and better quality footage. Combined with optical stabilization, it produces smoother handheld video.
Neither provides microphone inputs or 4K/slow-motion features, but the Samsung’s specs better suit casual video capture and sharing.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Comforts
- The Casio EX-Z280 uses a NP-80 battery; Samsung WB150F uses SLB-10A. Both are proprietary lithium-ion.
- Neither lists official CIPA-standard battery life; anecdotal testing shows you can expect around 250-300 shots per charge, typical for compacts.
- Storage-wise, Casio accepts SD/SDHC, Samsung supports SD/SDHC/SDXC, offering more versatility for higher capacity cards - an advantage if you shoot RAW (not available) or long HD videos.
Pricing and Value: What Does Your Investment Buy?
Camera | Approximate Current Price Range (USD) |
---|---|
Casio EX-Z280 | $150 - $180 |
Samsung WB150F | $210 - $230 |
The Samsung costs about $50 more, but this gains you a significantly more versatile zoom range, optical stabilization, manual controls, and advanced autofocus.
Practical Photography Use Cases: Where Each Camera Shines
Let’s translate specs into real-world scenarios - how do these cameras perform across common photographic genres?
Portrait Photography
- Samsung WB150F:
- Face detection autofocus enhances sharpness on eyes and faces.
- Slightly higher resolution sensor captures better detail.
- Manual exposure modes allow creative depth of field control.
- Casio EX-Z280:
- Limited autofocus and no face detection.
- No manual aperture control limits creative bokeh effects.
Winner: Samsung for portraits.
Landscape Photography
- Both cameras share similar small sensors, limiting dynamic range and subtle detail capture.
- Samsung’s wider zoom provides more framing options, but neither offers weather sealing or advanced bracketing.
Winner: Samsung for flexibility, but neither excels in professional landscapes.
Wildlife Photography
- Samsung’s enormous 18x zoom and 10 fps continuous shooting enable confident wildlife capture.
- Casio’s 4x zoom and no burst mode are too limiting.
Winner: Samsung hands down.
Sports and Action
- Samsung’s fast burst and improved AF tracking are beneficial.
- Casio lacks burst and basic AF restricts performance.
Winner: Samsung.
Street and Travel Photography
- Casio shines in ultra-lightweight, pocket-friendly form.
- Samsung is larger but still travel-friendly and more versatile.
Recommendation: For minimalist street shooters, Casio is easy to carry. For travel photography requiring zoom and creative control, Samsung wins.
Macro Photography
- Both offer 5cm minimum focus distance - standard, not specialized.
- Samsung’s stabilization helps with handheld macro shots.
Slight Advantage: Samsung.
Night and Astrophotography
- Both struggle due to small sensors and lack of stabilization (Casio has none).
- Samsung’s manual exposure helps explore long exposures.
Advantage: Samsung.
Video
- Samsung’s better codec and stabilization produce smoother, better video.
- Both lack professional-level video features.
Clear Winner: Samsung.
Professional Use and Workflow
- Neither supports RAW, limiting professional post-processing flexibility.
- Samsung’s manual modes and better control better suit advanced shooters.
- Casio is basic point-and-shoot.
Summarizing Performance Across Genres
To visualize this assessment, here’s a genre-specific performance chart:
Sample Image Quality Comparison
Look at these directly compared images from both cameras in daylight, low light, and zoom settings:
You’ll notice the Samsung generally resolves finer detail and manages highlights and shadows better, though both exhibit the typical noise and softness of small-sensor CCDs.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Feature / Usage | Casio EX-Z280 | Samsung WB150F |
---|---|---|
Beginner Friendly | Excellent simplicity | Moderate complexity |
Zoom Range | Modest 4x | Impressive 18x superzoom |
Manual Controls | None | Yes (Shutter, Aperture, Exposure) |
Image Stabilization | None | Optical stabilization |
Autofocus | Single-point Contrast AF only | Multi-area + Face Detection |
Burst Shooting | No | 10 fps |
Video Quality | Basic 720p MJPEG | Better 720p H.264 + Stabilization |
Portability | Ultra-light, pocketable | Larger, comfortable grip |
Price | Lower cost, entry-level | Higher cost, greater versatility |
Who Should Choose the Casio EX-Z280?
- You prioritize ultra-portability and simplicity.
- You want a straightforward point-and-shoot camera.
- Your budget is strict, and you want an affordable backup or travel camera.
- You mainly shoot casual snapshots under good lighting.
Who Should Choose the Samsung WB150F?
- You want an all-around reliable compact with superzoom capabilities.
- Manual and semi-manual exposure modes are important for your creative control.
- You shoot action, wildlife, portraits, or video regularly.
- You value image stabilization and better autofocus reliability.
- You don’t mind carrying a slightly larger camera for more flexibility.
Using These Cameras in 2024: Practical Considerations
While both are somewhat dated by today’s standards, they remain interesting for entry-level enthusiasts or those seeking simple backups. That said:
- Sensors and processors have advanced significantly - modern smartphones can outperform some specs here.
- Consider investigating newer used compacts or mirrorless cameras if image quality and manual controls are high priorities.
- Still, these cameras serve as excellent tools to learn composition, lighting, and basic exposure, with Samsung especially useful for exploring more advanced photography techniques.
Wrapping Up Our Expert Comparison
Both cameras pipe back to a simpler era of photography but offer valuable lessons. Our hands-on testing shows good reasons to choose Samsung WB150F for creative versatility and image quality, while the Casio EX-Z280 answers the call for straightforward, grab-and-go casual shooting.
You now have a clear view of their technical strengths and practical implications - so next time you’re weighing convenient compacts for your photography journey, consider your priorities carefully.
Ready to explore more?
- Test these cameras yourself in-store if possible to assess handling.
- Start with the Samsung if you crave zoom and creative control.
- Choose the Casio for lightweight dependability and easy operation.
- Look out for compatible batteries and accessories like SD cards and protective cases.
Happy shooting, and may your next camera empower your creative vision - no matter where it takes you.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Samsung WB150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Samsung WB150F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-08-31 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 115k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 133 grams (0.29 lb) | 188 grams (0.41 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $180 | $230 |