Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL350
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27


94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Launched March 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternative Name is WB2000

Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-Z29 versus Samsung TL350, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and TL350 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.

The EX-Z29 was announced 11 months before the TL350 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-Z29 grades versus the TL350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Samsung TL350. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Samsung TL350
EX-Z29 | TL350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Casio EX-Z29
TL350 | EX-Z29 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | ![]() | March 2009 | More recent by 11 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Samsung TL350
EX-Z29 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z29 features exterior dimensions of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z29 versus Samsung TL350 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z29 compared to the TL350.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z29 and TL350 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z29 and TL350.
Clearly, the two cameras feature the identical MP albeit different sensor measurements. The EX-Z29 offers the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF harder. The older EX-Z29 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung TL350 |
Alternative name | - | WB2000 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-03-03 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 115k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m | 5.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 195 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-60 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SDHC / SD Memory Card | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $79 | $400 |