Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Announced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Revealed February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z29 was manufactured 6 years before the DP2 Quattro which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-Z29 matches up versus the DP2 Quattro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| EX-Z29 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-Z29
| DP2 Quattro | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | March 2009 | More modern by 60 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| EX-Z29 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z29 offers outer dimensions of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z29 versus the DP2 Quattro.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z29 and DP2 Quattro is 95 and 70 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over specifications. The image below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z29 and DP2 Quattro.
To sum up, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z29 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer extra detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z29 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-03-03 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 395g (0.87 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-60 | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $79 | $931 |