Clicky

Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
19
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z29 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-Z29
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-113mm (F) lens
  • 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
  • Announced March 2009
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro: A Deep Dive into Two Distinct Compact Cameras

Choosing your next camera often comes down to understanding how different models align with your creative goals, shooting style, and budget. Today, we break down two compact cameras that showcase vastly different approaches: the Casio EX-Z29, a budget-friendly ultracompact from 2009, and the more specialized Sigma DP2 Quattro, a large-sensor compact targeting discerning photographers launched in 2014.

Having tested thousands of cameras over the years, I’ll guide you through their detailed specs, real-world performance, and usability across photography genres - helping you decide which deserves a spot in your camera bag. Let’s start by situating these cameras physically and ergonomically, before diving into their technical heart and creative capabilities.

Unpacking Size and Handling: Compact vs. Substantial

First impressions count, and how a camera feels in your hands influences how comfortably and confidently you shoot.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

  • Casio EX-Z29: Truly pocketable, this ultracompact measures just 101 x 57 x 23 mm and weighs 125 g. Its minimalist design suits casual users wanting quick snapshots without bulk. However, its small size may compromise grip security during intense sessions.
  • Sigma DP2 Quattro: Substantially larger at 161 x 67 x 82 mm and 395 g, the DP2 Quattro demands more hand space. Its larger size accommodates a more robust grip and controls tailored for manual operation, reflecting its positioning as a serious large sensor compact.

If portability and travel convenience top your list, the EX-Z29’s featherweight body wins. But for better ergonomic control during longer shoots or manual focus, the DP2 Quattro feels far more capable.

Exploring Design and Control Layouts: User Interface in Focus

Control ergonomics directly affect your shooting efficiency - the fewer the distractions, the better the creative flow.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

The EX-Z29 offers a simplified interface with basic exposure presets and a fixed lens zoom, favoring point-and-shoot ease. Meanwhile, the DP2 Quattro sports a comprehensive set of physical control dials and buttons, including manual exposure and shutter priority modes, plus exposure compensation - true photographer’s tools aimed at precision and creative control.

While the EX-Z29’s fixed, straightforward design suits casual shooting, the DP2 Quattro’s well-spaced, tactile controls make manual focus and exposure adjustments seamless, which is critical if you prefer hands-on shooting or studio work.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Sensor attributes dictate image detail, color reproduction, noise control, and dynamic range - and here is where these cameras diverge sharply.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Specification Casio EX-Z29 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Sensor Type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor Size 1/2.5" (5.744 x 4.308 mm) APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm)
Sensor Area 24.74 mm² 368.95 mm²
Resolution 10 MP (3648 x 2736 pixels) 20 MP (5424 x 3616 pixels)
ISO Range 100–1600 100–6400
Raw File Support No Yes
Anti-Aliasing Filter Yes Yes

What This Means for You

  • The EX-Z29’s small 1/2.5" CCD sensor works for casual daylight shooting but struggles in low light, and its 10MP resolution is adequate only for small prints or social sharing. It lacks raw support, limiting post-processing flexibility.
  • The DP2 Quattro’s APS-C Foveon X3 sensor is considerably larger and unique in capturing full color detail on three sensor layers rather than traditional Bayer filters. This method yields exceptionally sharp images with rich color fidelity - ideal for enthusiasts valuing detail and color accuracy. Native ISO extends to 6400, helping in dimmer conditions.

If ultimate image quality and creative control in post-processing matter to you, the Sigma DP2 Quattro’s sensor technology outclasses the Casio by a wide margin.

LCD Screen and User Interface Experience

Besides image quality, ease of framing and menu navigation can make or break your daily shooting experience.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison

  • EX-Z29: 2.7” fixed LCD with low resolution (115k pixels) serves basic framing needs but is dim and less detailed, especially outdoors.
  • DP2 Quattro: Offers a larger 3” TFT LCD with higher resolution (920k pixels), providing a brighter, clearer view for precise composition and review.

The DP2’s enhanced screen makes manual focusing and menu navigation more comfortable, an important factor during longer shoots or studio work.

Real-World Photography Across Genres

Let’s translate specs into practical scenarios - how these cameras perform in various photography disciplines.

Portrait Photography

Portraits demand accurate skin tones, capable autofocus, and pleasing bokeh:

  • EX-Z29: Fixed 38-113 mm zoom lets you frame tight portraits but struggles to blur backgrounds due to limited aperture control and small sensor depth-of-field. Contrast-detection autofocus (no face detection) can be slow, impacting sharp eye-focus.
  • DP2 Quattro: Fixed 45mm f/2.8 prime lens gives a naturally flattering perspective. Larger sensor and wide aperture enable smoother bokeh and better subject-background separation. Contrast-detection AF enhanced with face detection aids precise focus on eyes.

If portrait work is a priority, the Sigma’s optical advantages deliver higher-quality, professional-looking results.

Landscape Photography

For landscapes, you want wide dynamic range, resolution, and weather durability:

  • EX-Z29: Small sensor limits dynamic range; images can show noise in shadows. No weather sealing constrains outdoor use.
  • DP2 Quattro: Larger sensor excels in rendering wide tonal range and highlights. Though no weather sealing, its solid build and manual controls favor outdoor shooting.

While neither camera is ruggedized, the DP2’s superior sensor and resolution give your landscapes more detail and fidelity.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Here speed and autofocus tracking dominate:

  • EX-Z29: No continuous autofocus or high-speed burst modes; shutter speeds max out at 1/2000 sec. Limited functionality means missed action moments.
  • DP2 Quattro: Continuous shooting capped at 3 fps, no sophisticated tracking autofocus - not designed for fast action. Still, shutter priority and manual exposure give more control.

Neither camera targets wildlife or sports photography seriously. For these genres, dedicated DSLR or mirrorless cameras excel far beyond these compacts.

Street Photography

Street shooters value discretion, responsiveness, and portability:

  • EX-Z29: Pocketable and light, perfect for casual street snaps, but limited image quality and slow AF might miss fleeting moments.
  • DP2 Quattro: Bulkier and more conspicuous, yet silent shutter options assist covert shooting. Large sensor yields higher quality images under varied light.

If stealth and pocketability trump all, the Casio fits the bill. For more deliberate, high-quality street photography, the Sigma offers more satisfying results.

Macro Photography

Close focusing ability determines success with macro:

  • EX-Z29: No dedicated macro mode; limited focusing range restricts close-up creativity.
  • DP2 Quattro: Manual focus with peaking aids macro shooting, although lens isn’t optimized for true macro magnification.

Both models are limited for macro; specialized macro lenses or cameras better suit this genre.

Night and Astro Photography

High ISO noise, exposure flexibility, and long shutter support count here:

  • EX-Z29: Max ISO 1600 but noisy images; max shutter 2 seconds insufficient for creative long exposure work.
  • DP2 Quattro: ISO to 6400 helps, shutter priority/manual modes enable longer exposures. No in-camera astro modes, but raw support aids noise reduction processing.

Between the two, the Sigma’s higher ISO sensitivity and manual controls make night photography more achievable.

Video Capabilities

  • EX-Z29: Offers basic video at 640x480 max resolution (30 fps), recorded in Motion JPEG - outdated and low quality by today’s standards.
  • DP2 Quattro: Omits video recording completely, focusing solely on stills.

If video is part of your creative plan, the EX-Z29 barely covers basics; the DP2 Quattro is not an option.

Travel Photography

For travel, a versatile camera balances quality, portability, and battery life.

Feature Casio EX-Z29 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Size & Weight Ultra-light (125g), fits pocket Bulkier (395g), needs bag
Battery Life Small, no official rating Moderate, user reports fair
Lens Versatility 3x zoom (38-113mm equiv) Fixed 45mm prime
Image Quality Average, low light struggles Exceptional color/detail

The Casio’s small size is great for ultra-light packing on casual trips; meanwhile, the Sigma demands more space but rewards with higher quality images, making it an excellent companion for the serious traveler emphasizing image quality.

Professional Use and Workflow Integration

Being reliable and flexible in professional contexts is crucial.

  • EX-Z29: No raw, limited controls; unsuitable for professional workflows.
  • DP2 Quattro: Raw capture, manual exposure modes, and rich color detail cater to pros prioritizing image quality and post-processing control.

Neither camera features weather sealing or extensive storage options, but the Sigma’s imaging capabilities and workflow compatibility make it a viable secondary or travel specialty camera for pros.

Build Quality and Durability

Neither camera claims weather sealing or rugged design. The Sigma’s larger body feels sturdier in hand. The Casio’s ultracompact plastic construction aligns with its budget and casual user focus.

Autofocus System Performance

  • EX-Z29: Single contrast-detection AF; no continuous or face detection means slower focus in dynamic scenes.
  • DP2 Quattro: Contrast-detection with face detection and multi-area AF; no continuous AF tracking, but single AF is responsive and precise, especially in good light.

For action or fast-paced work, neither excels, but the DP2’s more advanced AF options benefit careful compositions.

Lens and Focal Length Comparison

  • EX-Z29: 38-113mm equivalent 3x zoom, max aperture unspecified but limited due to compact size.
  • DP2 Quattro: Fixed 45mm f/2.8 prime lens, smaller focal length multiplier (1.5x) means a moderate normal field of view.

The Casio offers framing flexibility with zoom, but the Sigma’s sharper prime lens yields superior optical quality, favoring image excellence over versatility.

Connectivity and Storage

  • EX-Z29: USB 2.0 port, Eye-Fi compatible wireless (limited modern support), SD/SDHC card.
  • DP2 Quattro: USB 2.0, SD card slot, no wireless features.

Neither camera supports wireless streaming, a reflection of their era and positioning.

Battery Life and Power

Official battery life data is absent. Compact cameras generally offer limited shooting on a single charge.

  • EX-Z29 uses NP-60 battery, light but limited.
  • DP2 Quattro uses BP-51, more substantial but still moderate endurance.

Carrying spares or external chargers is advised for extended shoots.

Price-to-Performance: An Honest Assessment

Camera Approximate Price (New) Strengths Limitations
Casio EX-Z29 $79 Affordable, pocket-sized, simple Limited image quality, no RAW, slow AF, weak low-light
Sigma DP2 Quattro $930 Exceptional APS-C image quality, manual controls, RAW support Expensive, bulky, no video, slow burst

As a budget snapshot camera, the Casio offers value for casual users or as a backup, but for professionals or enthusiasts seeking a creative tool with excellent image quality, the Sigma’s price reflects its substantial advantages.

Summing It All Up: Which Camera Fits Your Creative Vision?

Visual comparisons tell the story: the Sigma DP2 Quattro yields sharper, more vibrant images ideal for print or serious work, while the Casio EX-Z29 suits casual everyday snapshots with modest expectations.

Performance Ratings at a Glance

  • Casio EX-Z29: Low marks in image quality, autofocus, and versatility; high in portability.
  • Sigma DP2 Quattro: High scores in image quality and creative control; moderate in speed and portability.

Genre-Specific Scores to Guide Your Choice

Genre Casio EX-Z29 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Portrait Fair Excellent
Landscape Poor Very Good
Wildlife N/A Poor
Sports Poor Poor
Street Good Good
Macro Poor Moderate
Night/Astro Poor Good
Video Basic None
Travel Very Good Good
Professional Poor Good

Final Recommendations

Choose the Casio EX-Z29 if:

  • You need a lightweight, super-affordable point-and-shoot for casual use.
  • Your photography is mainly snapshots in good light with little need for manual control.
  • You want a compact backup or introductory camera for travel.

Go for the Sigma DP2 Quattro if:

  • You prioritize image quality with a large APS-C sensor and unique Foveon color capture.
  • You enjoy manual exposure control, RAW shooting, and intentional photography.
  • Portraits, landscapes, and detailed still photography are your primary pursuits.
  • You accept trade-offs in size, speed, and lack of video for superior still images.

Getting the Most Out of Your Chosen Camera

  • For Casio users: Find compact accessories like wrist straps and spare batteries to enhance your casual shooting. Avoid low light or fast action scenes to get the best results.
  • For Sigma users: Invest time in mastering manual focus and exposure modes. Utilize raw processing software to unlock the sensor’s full potential. Pair with sturdy tripods for long exposures and studio work.

The Creative Journey Ahead

Both cameras represent distinct chapters in compact photography - the Casio EX-Z29 as an easy handheld snapshot tool, and the Sigma DP2 Quattro as a specialist craft instrument for dedicated image makers. Whichever you choose, embrace it as a partner in exploring your unique photographic vision.

Check them out in person, handle their ergonomics, and feel their controls. Your hands and eyes will tell you which camera invites you to create the most.

Happy shooting!

Casio EX-Z29 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z29 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-Z29Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Name Casio Sigma
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z29 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Type Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-03-03 2014-02-13
Physical type Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.5" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 38-113mm (3.0x) 45mm (1x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8
Crop factor 6.3 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 115 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 2.80 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125g (0.28 pounds) 395g (0.87 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-60 BP-51
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SDHC / SD Memory Card -
Card slots One One
Price at release $79 $931