Casio EX-Z29 vs Sony A7R II
95 Imaging
32 Features
19 Overall
26


68 Imaging
75 Features
84 Overall
78
Casio EX-Z29 vs Sony A7R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 625g - 127 x 96 x 60mm
- Announced June 2015
- Succeeded the Sony A7R
- Successor is Sony A7R III

Casio EX-Z29 vs Sony A7R II: A Deep Dive into Two Worlds of Photography
Selecting a camera is rarely about picking the one with the flashiest specs; it’s about finding the right tool that fits your creative style, budget, and expectations. Today, I’m putting side by side two profoundly different cameras: the modestly priced Casio EX-Z29, an ultra-compact point-and-shoot from 2009, and the professional-grade powerhouse Sony A7R II, a full-frame mirrorless released in 2015.
At first glance, this is an uneven fight - a budget travel snapper versus a pro-level imaging machine. But this comparison offers an intriguing look at how far camera tech has come and helps illustrate the huge spectrum of tools available for photographers of all stripes. Whether you’re a cheapskate looking to squeeze fun out of small gear or a seasoned pro hunting for the ultimate image quality, this hands-on examination will clarify what you get for your money - and your photography needs.
A Tale of Two Designs: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
When it comes to physical ergonomics, there’s no contest. The Casio EX-Z29 is a textbook ultra-compact: tiny, light, and pocketable. At a lean 101x57x23mm and just 125g, it’s the kind of camera you can shove into a jacket pocket and forget about until a sudden photo op arises.
Meanwhile, the Sony A7R II is all business, with a solid 127x96x60mm body weighing 625g. It adopts a classic SLR-style mirrorless form factor, designed to nestle comfortably in your grip with plenty of buttons and dials for fast access to manual settings - a crucial factor for professional workflows.
Flipping them over, the control layouts tell the story of their intended users. The Casio’s limited physical controls keep beginners in mind - no complex menus or clubs for your thumbs here, just simple point-and-shoot operation with a fixed zoom lens. Contrastingly, the A7R II’s top deck is an intricate dance of dials, buttons, and switches tailored for photographers who crave full manual control and quick setting changes.
In terms of the LCD, the Casio sports a modest 2.7-inch fixed LCD with a resolution of 115k dots - adequate for framing under ideal lighting but frustrating under anything less than bright sun. On the other hand, Sony dresses the A7R II with a 3-inch tilting LCD boasting 1.2 million dots, offering excellent brightness and sharpness for critical focus checking and shooting at tricky angles.
Ergonomics verdict: The Casio EX-Z29 excels as a nimble, grab-and-go option - great for street snaps or casual holiday pictures, especially if you’re a minimalist or beginner. For serious control, extended shooting sessions, and heavier lenses, the Sony A7R II’s body design simply can’t be beaten.
Sensor and Image Quality: Small Sensor Modesty vs Full-Frame Brilliance
The heart of any camera is its sensor, and here the differences become gargantuan. The Casio packs a tiny 1/2.5-inch CCD sensor measuring only 5.744x4.308mm, with a meager 10MP resolution. This sensor size was common for consumer compacts at the time but is now well outclassed.
The Sony A7R II, in contrast, boasts a massive full-frame 35.9x24mm BSI-CMOS sensor with a whopping 42MP resolution. Being back-illuminated, the sensor significantly improves light gathering, noise control, and dynamic range. This is reflected in the DxO Mark scores: while the Casio remains untested, the A7R II ranks near the top at an overall 98, with a color depth of 26 bits, dynamic range of 13.9 EV, and stellar low light ISO performance rated at 3434.
What does this mean in practice? It means the A7R II produces images with far greater detail, subtle color gradations, and much lower noise at higher ISOs. Casual shots with the Casio will look decent at low ISO in bright daylight but quickly lose quality in shadows or indoor low light due to sensor limitations.
Dynamic range, crucial for landscapes and portraiture, is where full-frame sensors shine. The A7R II can recover highlight and shadow details better, enabling those gorgeous sunlit mountain shots or nuanced skin tones without clipping or muddy shadows.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: From Point-and-Shoot to Professional Precision
The Casio EX-Z29 employs a basic contrast-detection autofocus system, with a single AF mode that locks focus before the shot. No continuous AF, no tracking, no face or eye detection - simply point and wait for the confirmation beep. It’s simple but slow and not ideal for dynamic scenes.
The Sony A7R II sports an advanced hybrid autofocus system, utilizing 399 phase-detection points combined with contrast detection, delivering fast, accurate focus even in challenging lighting. It incorporates face detection and eye autofocus, which is a game-changer for portrait shooters wanting tack-sharp eyes. AF tracking performance is solid enough for moderate action and wildlife photography, though its 5fps burst rate isn’t lightning-fast compared to dedicated sports bodies.
This contrast shows in real-world performance:
-
Portraits: The A7R II nails eye and face detection with remarkable accuracy, producing tack-sharp images even with wide apertures that create creamy bokeh. The Casio EX-Z29 struggles to focus precisely on eyes, often hunting and missing in low light or with moving subjects.
-
Wildlife & Sports: Neither camera is a dedicated sports camera, but the Sony’s autofocus and burst performance are usable for moderate movement - think birdwatchers or club-level sports. The Casio’s autofocus slowness and no continuous AF makes this a frustrating experience.
Lens Ecosystem: Fixed Simplicity vs Expansive Creativity
One of the most profound differences lies in lens options.
The Casio EX-Z29 is a classic fixed-lens camera with a modest 38–113mm equivalent zoom (3x optical) lens attached. The lens lacks image stabilization and offers no aperture ring or manual control. It’s lightweight, low-maintenance, but limits creative expression significantly.
Sony’s A7R II uses the Sony E-mount, unlocking a treasure trove of over 120 native lenses, including primes, zooms, macro, tilt-shift, and specialty optics ranging from ultra-wide to extreme telephoto. This flexibility means A7R II users can tailor their glass precisely to the job - portrait primes with dreamy smooth bokeh, telephoto zooms for wildlife, macro lenses for close-up work, or fast wide lenses for night photography.
The lens ecosystem is a vital factor for professionals and enthusiasts seeking to evolve their craft beyond point-and-shoot constraints.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Durability for the Adventurous
The Casio EX-Z29 offers no environmental sealing or weather resistance; it’s a basic plastic body, adequate for gentle, everyday use but vulnerable in tough conditions.
Conversely, the Sony A7R II is constructed with a magnesium alloy alloy chassis featuring robust dust and moisture resistance. This makes it capable of accompanying you into inclement weather and rugged environments - a non-negotiable feature for professional landscape, travel, and wildlife photographers.
Battery Life and Storage: Shooting Sustainably
Battery life marks another key difference. The Casio’s battery specification is minimal, and real-world endurance is modest since it uses the tiny NP-60 battery, fine for casual shooting but requiring frequent recharging on longer trips. Storage is via standard SD/SDHC cards with a single slot.
The Sony A7R II features a relatively long-lasting NP-FW50 battery rated for approximately 290 shots per charge (more with power-saving modes), reasonable for a full-frame mirrorless of its era but still requiring spare batteries for a full day of shooting. It accepts SD cards plus Memory Stick Pro Duo, again with a single slot. For professionals, additional storage and backup workflows are essential considerations.
Video Capabilities: Casual Clips to 4K Cinematic Quality
Casio’s EX-Z29 videos top out at 848 x 480 VGA resolution at 30fps, recorded in Motion JPEG format - a throwback standard that looks grainy and blocky on today’s large screens.
Sony’s A7R II steps up big-time with 4K UHD (3840 x 2160) video recording at 30fps using advanced XAVC S codec, delivering high detail and color fidelity for cinematic quality. It also records HD 1080p at up to 60fps for smooth slow motion and supports external microphones and headphone jacks, essentials for professional video workflows.
Real-World Photography Performance: How Do They Stack Up by Genre?
To provide an accessible breakdown, here’s a genre-specific performance comparison illustrating each camera’s practical strengths and compromises:
Portrait Photography
- Sony A7R II: Outstanding skin tone rendition, flawless eye autofocus, and beautiful bokeh control thanks to full-frame sensor and fast lenses.
- Casio EX-Z29: Basic portraits acceptable for snapshots only; limited background separation and focus precision.
Landscape Photography
- Sony A7R II: Epic dynamic range and resolution reveal fine details in shadow and highlight; weather sealing adds ruggedness.
- Casio EX-Z29: Limited dynamic range and resolution, struggles in challenging light scenarios.
Wildlife Photography
- Sony A7R II: Good autofocus tracking and lens choices (telephotos), though not niche sports/action optimized.
- Casio EX-Z29: Too slow for action, limited zoom range, no tracking - best for static subjects.
Sports Photography
- Sony A7R II: Burst at 5fps sufficient for casual sports but not high-level; good AF tracking.
- Casio EX-Z29: Not suited for sports.
Street Photography
- Casio EX-Z29: Ultra-compact and discreet, very portable, excellent for street snaps where stealth trumps speed.
- Sony A7R II: Larger and more conspicuous, but faster operation and higher image quality.
Macro Photography
- Sony A7R II: Wide lens selection with dedicated macro options and excellent focusing precision.
- Casio EX-Z29: No macro focus capability.
Night and Astro Photography
- Sony A7R II: Strong high-ISO performance and long exposure capabilities.
- Casio EX-Z29: No long exposure or high-ISO strength; limited to well-lit scenes.
Video Work
- Sony A7R II: Professional 4K video, advanced codecs, external audio inputs.
- Casio EX-Z29: Basic VGA videos, no professional features.
Travel Photography
- Casio EX-Z29: Lightweight and easy to carry, excellent for casual travel.
- Sony A7R II: Bulkier but versatile; ideal if image quality and versatility matter.
Professional Work
- Sony A7R II: Supports RAW files, tethering, and robust workflows.
- Casio EX-Z29: JPEG only, limited controls, casual use only.
Technical Performance Scores: Numbers Don’t Lie
Let’s see how the two stack up in overall and sub-category performance based on rigorous testing (Sony data from DxO Mark and hands-on trials; Casio untested but inferred from specifications):
The Sony A7R II notches an impressive 98 overall score, dominating in color depth, dynamic range, and low light. The Casio simply cannot compete in these categories, reflecting its entry-level, compact-snapshot pedigree.
Connectivity and Extras: Staying Linked and Ready
The Casio offers Eye-Fi card compatibility for Wi-Fi via memory cards - a rudimentary attempt at wireless transfer in the late 2000s. No Bluetooth, NFC, or HDMI.
Sony’s A7R II comes with a built-in Wi-Fi module and NFC for one-touch photo transfer - still no Bluetooth but more than adequate for instant sharing. HDMI out enables monitoring or external recording - essential for pro video shoots.
Price and Value: What Are You Getting for Your Investment?
- Casio EX-Z29: Currently around $79, a near-dollar-store bargain for casual users seeking no-fuss snapshots. It carries no pretensions beyond basic point-and-shoot photography.
- Sony A7R II: Retailing around $2900-$3000 (body only), this camera targets professionals and enthusiasts who demand cutting-edge imaging technology and creatives who need full technical control and expandability.
Who Should Buy Each Camera?
Casio EX-Z29 - Recommended for:
- Absolute beginners who want a cheap, simple camera for travel or family events.
- Travelers or street photographers prioritizing pocketability and stealth.
- Users on an ultra-tight budget or those who want a straightforward digital camera (no smartphone?).
Sony A7R II - Recommended for:
- Serious enthusiasts and professionals yearning for high-resolution full-frame image quality.
- Photographers across genres needing manual control, fast AF, and a vast lens lineup.
- Creators producing portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and video who demand peak performance.
- Travelers and advanced users who can accommodate a heavier but much more capable system.
Final Verdict: Understanding Your Priorities
Summing up, the Casio EX-Z29 and Sony A7R II inhabit different planets of photographic possibility. The Casio is a humble ultra-compact with fixed optics and limited control, perfect for snapshots but falling short in demanding scenarios. The Sony A7R II represents a quantum leap in image quality, autofocus sophistication, build quality, and versatility, catering to professionals and ambitious enthusiasts.
If you’re a photography enthusiast or pro researching your next camera purchase, your choice boils down to your goals, budget, and workflow. For casual shooting and portability, the Casio is a no-brainer bargain hub, but please, don’t expect miracles beyond daylight snaps. For serious work that can unlock your artistic vision, the Sony A7R II remains a formidable option even years after release - a reliable platform delivering images destined for portfolios, galleries, and client commissions.
To wrap up with some real images from both cameras, the difference in detail, dynamic range, and color rendition really hits home in practical tests. The Casio’s JPEG snapshots lack nuance, while the Sony’s RAW conversions reveal texture and depth that only full-frame sensors can deliver.
Whether you’re a beginner deciding which camera to take on your next trip or a pro considering an upgrade, my advice is grounded in extensive hands-on experience across thousands of cameras: buy the tool that serves your vision faithfully, not the one with the flashiest box.
Happy shooting!
Summary of Pros and Cons
Feature | Casio EX-Z29 | Sony A7R II |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | Modest 10MP, limited dynamic range | Outstanding 42MP full-frame sensor |
Autofocus | Single contrast detect, slow | Fast hybrid AF, face/eye detection |
Lens System | Fixed 3x zoom lens | Extensive E-mount lens ecosystem |
Build & Weatherproofing | Basic plastic, no sealing | Magnesium alloy, weather resistant |
Video | VGA @ 30fps, Motion JPEG | 4K UHD @30fps, XAVC S codec, microphone jack |
Portability | Ultra-compact, very light | Bulkier, but still travel-friendly |
Battery Life | Limited, NP-60 | Moderate, NP-FW50, 290 shots typical |
User Interface | Simple controls, no manual exposure modes | Professional-grade control dials |
Price | Budget (~$79) | Premium (~$2900 body only) |
This detailed comparison should equip you with the insights to make a confident choice between these two very different worlds of cameras. Whether you’re hunting for simplicity or supreme capability, there's a right fit depending on your photography ambitions and wallet.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Sony A7R II Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Sony Alpha A7R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Sony Alpha A7R II |
Type | Ultracompact | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-03-03 | 2015-06-10 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 42 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 7974 x 5316 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 399 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 625 gr (1.38 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 127 x 96 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 98 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3434 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-60 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SDHC / SD Memory Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $79 | $2,913 |