Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL205
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also referred to as PL100
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z33 versus Samsung TL205, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the TL205 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z33 was introduced 4 months before the TL205 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z33 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-Z33 matches up against the TL205 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 and Samsung TL205. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery and Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung TL205
| EX-Z33 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Casio EX-Z33
| TL205 | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung TL205
| EX-Z33 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2009 |  | January 2010 | Same generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z33 has physical dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL205 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z33 versus Samsung TL205 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z33 against the TL205.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and TL205 is 97 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z33 and TL205.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung TL205 to show greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung TL205 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL100 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-08-31 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 106 grams (0.23 pounds) | 177 grams (0.39 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $120 | $180 |