Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Olympus SP-810 UZ front
Portability
78
Imaging
37
Features
34
Overall
35

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Launched August 2008
  • Superseded the Olympus E-510
Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
  • 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Succeeded the Olympus SP-800 UZ
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-520 and Olympus SP-810 UZ, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and SP-810 UZ (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and SP-810 UZ (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-520 was launched 3 years before the SP-810 UZ and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-520 matches up vs the SP-810 UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ

 E-520 SP-810 UZ 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Olympus E-520

 SP-810 UZ E-520 
ReleasedJuly 2011August 2008More recent by 35 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus SP-810 UZ

 E-520 SP-810 UZ 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 provides outer measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-810 UZ has dimensions of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-520 and Olympus SP-810 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-520 against the SP-810 UZ.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and SP-810 UZ is 68 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and SP-810 UZ.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-520 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus SP-810 UZ will give more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography info
Olympus SP-810 UZ Portrait photography info
59
manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
low resolution (10MP)
33
resolution is good (14MP)
features face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography details
Olympus SP-810 UZ Street photography details
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
50
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SP-810 UZ as a Sports photography camera
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
better than average battery power (650 per charge)
supports phase detect autofocus
low frames per second (4.0 fps)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
40
great zoom range (24-864mm 36.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,200s)
very slow continuous shooting (0.7 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SP-810 UZ as a Travel photography camera
52
better than average battery power (650 per charge)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse function
low resolution (10 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
61
resolution is good (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
long zoom (864mm)
missing Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.9)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography information
Olympus SP-810 UZ Landscape photography information
58
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (650 CIPA)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
low resolution (10MP)
missing Timelapse function
40
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
lack of manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging information
Olympus SP-810 UZ Vlogging information
9
no video shooting
27
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
slow max aperture (f2.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Olympus SP-810 UZ
 Olympus E-520Olympus SP-810 UZ
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-520 Olympus SP-810 UZ
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2008-08-20 2011-07-27
Body design Compact SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-864mm (36.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.9-5.7
Macro focus range - 5cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 1/4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1200 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames/s 0.7 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 6.20 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 552g (1.22 lbs) 413g (0.91 lbs)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail price $400 $280