Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus 5010

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Olympus Stylus 5010 front
Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
27
Overall
32

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Released February 2010
Olympus 5010
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
  • Released January 2010
  • Other Name is mju 5010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus 5010 Overview

Here, we are analyzing the Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus 5010, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the 5010 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The EX-Z35 was manufactured 2 months after the 5010 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-Z35 grades against the 5010 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Olympus 5010

 EX-Z35 5010 
Focus manually Very exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Casio EX-Z35

 5010 EX-Z35 
Display size2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Olympus 5010

 EX-Z35 5010 
ReleasedFebruary 2010January 2010Same age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 features physical measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus 5010 has measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus 5010 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the 5010.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus 5010 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and 5010 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing specs. The image here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and 5010.

All in all, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus 5010 to show greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images way more aggressively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Portrait photography features
Olympus 5010 Portrait photography features
27
you can focus manually
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
28
decent MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Street photography highlights
Olympus 5010 Street photography highlights
48
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography details
Olympus 5010 Sports photography details
17
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
39
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Travel photography factors
Olympus 5010 Travel photography factors
52
has built in flash
no Time Lapse recording
low MP (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
65
decent MP (14MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Landscape photography info
Olympus 5010 Landscape photography info
28
you can focus manually
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
37
reasonably wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Vlogging highlights
Olympus 5010 Vlogging highlights
22
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic socket
29
reasonably wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus 5010 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Olympus 5010
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Olympus Stylus 5010
General Information
Make Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Olympus Stylus 5010
Other name - mju 5010
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2010-02-21 2010-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus range 10cm 7cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 2.7"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 124 gr (0.27 lb) 126 gr (0.28 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-82 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $99 $150