Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Revealed August 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Olympus SP-565UZ, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are sold by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was brought out 11 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-M10 IV matches up against the SP-565UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV and Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M10 IV | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2020 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 141 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-M10 IV
SP-565UZ | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M10 IV | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 IV comes with physical measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Olympus SP-565UZ in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 IV against the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebe33/ebe336371fdf07572bf745833b3c70e168b49f89" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and SP-565UZ is 81 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d5fb/9d5fb4dde67b6f1d088f92059986f605916680f8" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The visual underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 IV and SP-565UZ.
Plainly, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 IV will result in greater detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 IV should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a71c9/a71c988d77fda269feebb572aea7aa0721da5f45" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cc82/9cc8289c421b89ae7bdb0f435298f4192bd7d043" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2020-08-04 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.7fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 383 gr (0.84 lb) | 413 gr (0.91 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $699 | $400 |