Casio EX-Z35 vs Panasonic FP8
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26


95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z35 vs Panasonic FP8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 151g - 96 x 60 x 20mm
- Released July 2009

Casio EX-Z35 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8: An Ultracompact Camera Showdown from the Past
When exploring ultracompact cameras from a decade ago, enthusiasts often overlook the subtle design philosophies and engineering compromises that went into models like the Casio EX-Z35 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8. Both aim to be pocketable companions yet appeal to slightly different user preferences and priorities.
Having personally tested hundreds of compact cameras over 15 years, I find revisiting these models a fresh reminder that size and specs aren't the only story. Let’s take a detailed, hands-on look at their core capabilities, practical performance, and how well they serve specific photography needs - helping you decide if either deserves a spot in your collection or workflow.
First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Design
Physical dimensions and ergonomics are king in ultracompacts - you want a camera that’s inviting to carry and intuitive to operate without fuss.
Looking at these two side-by-side, the Casio EX-Z35 measures a neat 99×57×20 mm (about 124 g), slightly slimmer and lighter than the Panasonic FP8’s 96×60×20 mm at 151 g. That’s a meaningful difference if pocket carry is a priority.
The Casio’s compact rectangular body feels nimble but offers limited grip, making one-handed steady shooting a bit of a stretch. The Panasonic, while heavier, provides a slightly more substantial feel and a better tactile hold, which I appreciated during longer shooting sessions. Build materials are mostly plastic on both, typical of the era and price segment, but neither features any weather sealing or ruggedization.
Looking at the top view design and control layout reinforces their shared minimalist ethos:
Both lack mode dials or dedicated manual controls - very much point-and-shoot, designed more for entry-level users than manual shooters. Notably, the Panasonic FP8 has a zoom lever and shutter button positioned ergonomically for quick reach, whereas the Casio’s buttons feel smaller and less intuitive in comparison.
If you value pocketability above all, the Casio edges out slightly, but if you prefer practical handling even in small bodies, the Panasonic FP8 nudges ahead.
Sensor and Image Quality: Same Size, Different Flavors
Both cameras rely on a 1/2.3" CCD sensor sporting a 12-megapixel resolution, neither supporting RAW capture, which already sets expectations for limited post-processing latitude.
The Casio’s sensor measures approximately 6.17×4.55 mm, while Panasonic’s is 6.08×4.56 mm - sensor size is effectively identical, meaning image quality differences hinge on processing and lens performance.
The Casio employs its Exilim Engine 5.0 processor, emphasizing quick response and ease of use, but with older noise reduction algorithms that can sometimes smudge fine detail at higher ISOs. Its native ISO tops out at 3200, which in practice is quite noisy and best avoided beyond 800.
The Panasonic’s Venus Engine V processor delivers a slight edge in high ISO performance, with a max ISO of 6400, though noise remains very apparent above 400. Still, it benefits from better noise management and modestly improved dynamic range, producing slightly crisper, cleaner images at base sensitivities.
Neither camera supports highlight or shadow optimization campaigns robustly, so dynamic range is quite limited - a drawback for landscape enthusiasts aiming for subtle tonal gradations.
The presence of an anti-aliasing filter on both slightly softens the maximum possible resolution but helps prevent moiré, a fair trade for these sensor sizes and lens designs.
LCD Display and Interface: Your Window to Composition
Without electronic viewfinders, the rear LCDs serve as both composition aids and image review stations.
The Casio’s 2.5-inch 230k-dot fixed LCD is serviceable but feels cramped and less vibrant. The Panasonic ups the game with a slightly larger 2.7-inch 230k-dot screen, offering a bit more real estate to frame shots or navigate menus - not a giant leap, but appreciated for clarity.
Both screens lack touchscreen functionality, which feels dated by today’s standards but was common then. The Panasonic’s menu system felt more logical and less prone to accidental button presses. The Casio, by contrast, sometimes requires multiple presses to reach desired settings, which could slow down shooting.
I missed the presence of a tilting or articulating screen on either, particularly for low or high angle shots - a minor gripe - but understandable given their compact form factors.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Where Speed Matters
For many photographers, autofocus responsiveness and burst shooting define practical usability, especially for wildlife, sports, or street genres.
Unfortunately, neither camera sports advanced AF features - both rely solely on contrast detection, with no face or eye detection modes.
- The Casio EX-Z35 has single-shot AF only, with a modest focus lock time (~0.4 seconds), but no continuous AF or tracking. This means moving subjects are essentially a guessing game.
- The Panasonic FP8, while also limited to single AF, boasts 11 AF points, offering slightly more flexibility for composition. AF speed is a bit slower (~0.5 seconds on average), but focus accuracy is reliable in good light.
Neither supports manual focus (the Casio does handle manual focus, albeit rudimentarily, Panasonic does not), so in challenging scenarios, you have to accept the camera’s choices.
Burst shooting is nearly absent on the Casio, whereas the Panasonic offers a very modest 2 fps continuous mode - not suitable for serious sports or wildlife, but better than nothing.
Lens and Macro Capability: Zoom Range and Close-Up Focus
Let’s talk optics - both rely on fixed zoom lenses.
- The Casio EX-Z35 sports a 36-107 mm equivalent (3x optical zoom) with an aperture of f/3.1–5.6.
- The Panasonic FP8 offers a more versatile 28-128 mm equivalent zoom (4.6x optical zoom), from f/3.3 to f/5.9.
If you spend time shooting subjects at varying distances, Panasonic’s longer zoom reach can be advantageous, though image quality at the telephoto end noticeably softens.
On the macro front, the Panasonic’s close focus starts at 5 cm, allowing for more detailed close-ups than the Casio’s 10 cm minimum. For those dabbling in macro photography, even casual flower or product shots, the Panasonic’s ability to get closer helps producing more immersive detail.
Both cameras lack image stabilization on the Casio, while the Panasonic includes optical image stabilization, which aids handheld shooting in lower light or at maximum zoom.
Flash and Low-Light Adaptability
Small cameras like these often hit limitations in low-light shooting.
The Casio’s built-in flash illuminates up to 3.2 meters with standard auto, on, off, red-eye, and soft modes available. The Panasonic pushes the flash range to 5.5 meters and adds slow sync flash, helpful for balancing ambient light at night.
Neither can synchronize with external flash units, limiting creative lighting options.
ISO range is similar but practical usable ISOs are usually capped around 400-800 before noise overwhelms images. The Panasonic’s image stabilization system helps with slightly longer exposures handheld, a benefit for night street photographers or casual event shooters.
Video Capabilities: More Than Just a Still Camera
Video recording on these ultracompacts is basic but worth a look if you plan to capture motion.
- The Casio records a maximum resolution of 848×480 at 30fps in Motion JPEG, which produces bulky files and lower overall quality.
- Panasonic provides a great step up with 1280×720 (720p) HD capabilities at 30fps, which even by today’s standards is decent for casual video.
Notable is Panasonic’s HDMI output support, meaning you can display images or videos on modern TVs - a convenience missing on the Casio. Neither offers microphone inputs, headphone jacks, or advanced video features like manual exposure or focus control.
Connectivity, Storage, and Power: Practical Considerations
Both cameras rely solely on SD/SDHC cards alongside internal memory. Storage options are straightforward and expandable.
For data transfer, both use USB 2.0 - standard for their release era, with no wireless features like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. If you often upload photos on the go, you’ll need a card reader or PC connection.
Battery specifications:
- The Casio uses an NP-82 battery.
- Panasonic’s exact battery model isn’t listed but shares a similar endurance range (generally around 200-300 shots per charge).
Neither camera features battery life indicators beyond basic warnings, nor do they support USB charging - users need a dedicated charger, crucial to keep in mind when traveling.
Durability and Environmental Resistance
Neither camera includes environmental sealing or rugged build features. No waterproofing, dustproofing, shockproofing, or freezeproofing. Both require careful handling and are best served in dry, moderate weather.
For travel photographers venturing into varied climates, consider protective cases or more robust models.
Pricing and Value Proposition: What You Get For Your Money
At launch, the Casio EX-Z35 was priced around $99 USD, while the Panasonic FP8 commanded about $300 USD - a significant difference in this entry-level segment.
Given the Panasonic’s better zoom range, image stabilization, HD video, and slightly more refined ergonomics, the higher price is justified if those features align with your needs.
The Casio, conversely, caters best to those seeking a straightforward, budget-friendly snapshot camera - small, light, and simple.
Putting It All Together: Overall Performance Scores and Genre Suitability
Here’s a composite view integrating key performance metrics across multiple photography disciplines.
And breaking those down by photographic genre:
How They Perform Across Photography Genres - My Take
Portrait Photography
Neither camera supports face detection or eye autofocus, falling short in capturing consistently sharp eyes or handling skin tone nuances. The Panasonic’s larger zoom range helps compose flattering headshots, but the lack of manual aperture control limits depth of field manipulation for creamy backgrounds.
Landscape Photography
Limited dynamic range from the tiny sensor and absence of RAW capture challenge creative latitude - both cameras deliver flat images with less detail in shadows and highlights. Panasonic FP8’s wider lens angle (28mm equivalent) stands out as the better landscape companion, though its weather resistance is non-existent.
Wildlife Photography
Tough ground - autofocus sluggishness, lack of tracking, and low burst rates limit both cameras severely. Panasonic’s longer zoom helps pull subjects closer, but image detail and speed won’t satisfy. The Casio’s shorter zoom and faster shutter limit distance reach.
Sports Photography
Neither ideal. Absence of high-speed continuous shooting or tracking autofocus means missed action frames. Sports shooters should look elsewhere.
Street Photography
Compact size aids discretion for both. Panasonic is slightly heavier but offers improved stabilization, useful in dim urban settings. The fixed lenses limit creative framing, but the cameras are reliable for snapshooting.
Macro Photography
The Panasonic FP8 shines here with 5 cm minimum focus details and optical image stabilization aiding sharpness, a clear win over Casio’s 10 cm minimum.
Night and Astro
High ISO noise restricts long-exposure or starry sky shots. Lack of manual exposure modes and bulb modes hinders astrophotography prospects on both.
Video
Panasonic’s 720p resolution is a notable advantage, paired with HDMI out and optical stabilization assisting handheld capture. Casio trails with VGA quality video.
Travel
Panasonic’s extended zoom, stabilization, and video capabilities outweigh its higher weight and price for travelers seeking versatility. Casio lures those prioritizing ultra-lightweight and simplicity.
Professional Work
Neither camera integrates professional workflow features - no RAW, restricted manual controls, and basic file formats. Professionals may only keep these for casual snapshot backups.
Recommendations Tailored to Your Needs
If you want a budget snapshot camera, easy to pocket, with basic functions for family or casual use, Casio EX-Z35 fits the bill. Its simplicity and smaller size are undeniable pluses if photography is a hobby, not a passion.
If you prefer more control and versatility, especially valuing longer zoom, macro capabilities, and quality video recording in a compact form, the Panasonic FP8 is well worth the increased investment.
Closing Thoughts: Lessons From Testing This Ultracompact Duo
While neither camera holds a candle to modern smartphones or mirrorless systems, examining the Casio EX-Z35 and Panasonic Lumix FP8 offers valuable lessons in camera design tradeoffs. Sensor size limits image quality regardless of brand, but lens choices, autofocus sophistication, and feature sets shape the user experience substantially.
I’ve found that even subtle differences in ergonomics or imaging processing make a lasting impact on satisfaction - things not always obvious on paper.
So if you stumble across these models used or refurbished and wonder which to pick, consider how you shoot, what genres excite you, and what features align with your workflow.
I hope this detailed comparison sheds light on both cameras with practical insight gained from extensive real-world testing. Happy shooting!
Additional Visualization Recap
- Size and Handling:
- Controls and Design:
- Sensor Details:
- LCD and Interface:
- Sample Images Comparison:
- Overall Scores:
- Genre Performance:
If you want to dive deeper into updated ultracompact and travel zoom cameras with modern sensors and connectivity, I’ve also reviewed models that cover these areas extensively. But these legacy cameras still have charm and lessons hidden beneath their surface.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Panasonic FP8 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Panasonic |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 151 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 96 x 60 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $99 | $300 |