Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX200V
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Casio and Sony. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z35 was announced 23 months before the TX200V which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-Z35 matches up against the TX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sony TX200V
EX-Z35 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Casio EX-Z35
TX200V | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | February 2010 | Fresher by 23 months | |
Screen dimension | 3.3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.8") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony TX200V
EX-Z35 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 provides outer measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony TX200V in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z35 and the TX200V.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and TX200V is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and TX200V.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Sony TX200V to provide you with greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3.3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124g (0.27 lbs) | 129g (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-82 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $99 | $500 |