Casio EX-Z450 vs Sony TX55
96 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30


97 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z450 vs Sony TX55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-5.8) lens
- 128g - 81 x 56 x 21mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Released July 2011

Compact Contenders: Casio EX-Z450 vs Sony TX55 – A Hands-On Expert Comparison
Choosing a compact camera in today’s smartphone-saturated world can feel like a wild goose chase. Yet, for enthusiasts and even some pros who prize the convenience of pocketable optics, lightweight handling, and straightforward operation, small sensor compacts still hold a certain charm. Today, I’m diving deep into two contenders from the past decade: the Casio EX-Z450 (2009) and the Sony Cyber-shot TX55 (2011). Don’t let the age fool you - these cameras still exemplify intriguing design philosophies and technology decisions that ring lessons for any compact camera seeker.
Having handled, tested, and pitted both against common imaging tasks, I want to give you an unvarnished, experience-driven comparison that goes beyond spec sheets. If you’re weighing one of these as a budget-friendly gateway or a secondary pocket camera, buckle up - practical insights, real-world performance notes, and honest opinions are coming your way.
Size and Ergonomics: How They Feel in Your Hands
Let’s first talk about the tangible. Handling comfort and physical design can often make or break your shooting experience, especially in small cameras where control layouts get crammed into tight spaces.
Both cameras fall into the small sensor compact category, but their body types differ - the Casio EX-Z450 is a modestly sized compact, while the Sony TX55 as an ultracompact basically pushes the envelope on pocketability. The EX-Z450 measures roughly 81x56x21 mm and weighs 128g; the Sony brings a slimmer profile at 93x54x13 mm and tips the scales lighter at 109g.
From personal use, the Casio feels bulkier, which ironically aids grip security - its squared-off body doesn’t slip as easily from your hands, especially for folks like me who have thicker fingers (and insist on not dropping their gear). Controls are mostly minimal, and despite its small size, it provides a modest thumb rest at the rear.
The Sony TX55 leans more toward the sleek candy bar shape, favoring portability but sacrificing some grip comfort. It’s excellent for those tight pockets and quick snaps but feels a bit fiddly when shooting in anything other than ideal conditions.
Looking at their top controls…
You’ll notice the TX55’s top panel is minimalistic, with a power button and a shutter release ring - a neat touch that gives you zoom control and shutter in one. The EX-Z450 features a straightforward shutter and zoom toggle but with fewer flair elements.
Ergo verdict: If you prize secure handling and physical control precision, Casio slightly leads; if ultra-portability and refined sleekness win your heart, the Sony feels more polished.
Under the Hood: Sensor Size and Image Quality Potential
Many still judge compact cameras primarily by sensor specs and resultant image quality, so this section is crucial.
Both use the now-common 1/2.3” sensor size (about 6.17x4.55mm sensor dimensions), which places their imaging capabilities in the same ballpark. The EX-Z450 boasts a 12 MP CCD sensor - typical for 2009-era compacts, offering good color fidelity but limited ISO flexibility and higher noise at elevated ISO speeds.
Sony’s TX55 steps up to a 16 MP BSI-CMOS sensor. Backside illumination matters here: it enhances low light performance and dynamic range compared to traditional front-side illuminated sensors like Casio’s CCD. The TX55 also stretches its sensitivity from ISO 100 to 3200, helping in dim conditions.
Testing both on standardized charts and real scenes confirms this theoretical edge - Sony produces crisper details and cleaner shadows wider dynamic range. Casio’s CCD makes colors pop in daylight but struggles with shadow noise and dynamic range compression.
Note: Neither supports RAW, which drastically limits post-processing flexibility - a frustration if you value pro-grade workflows.
Viewing and Interface: How You Compose and Adjust
The rear interface is your window into the camera’s soul; a careless design here can lead to frustration.
Sony’s TX55 sports a 3.3-inch XtraFine OLED touchscreen with 1230k-dot resolution - eye candy for sure. The touchscreen makes menus and playback navigation intuitive, unlike Casio’s EX-Z450 with a 3-inch, comparatively low-res 230k-dot fixed LCD and no touchscreen.
As a seasoned tester, I have to say this interface difference impacts speed and comfort - the Sony lets you change settings and review images quickly. Casio’s screen is serviceable but feels antiquated, especially in bright daylight where visibility diminishes.
However, neither camera includes an electronic viewfinder, meaning reliance on the rear screen to compose shots underwater bright or in direct sunlight can be tricky.
Autofocus and Lens Performance: Fast, Sharp, or Both?
AF systems in these compacts are understandably simple due to small sensor size and budget placement, yet there are nuances.
- Casio EX-Z450: Contrast detection AF with single-point focus; no tracking or face detection. Macro focus from 10cm.
- Sony TX55: Contrast detection AF but includes more focus points (9) and multi-area selection, along with center-weighted AF. Macro focus as close as 3cm. Includes optical image stabilization (OIS).
In real shooting, Casio requires patiently locking focus, especially in low light or close-range scenes. Its lack of AF assist or tracking can feel limiting when photographing moving subjects or indoors.
The Sony, in contrast, nails focus quickly with better precision, even though it only offers single AF rather than continuous tracking. The OIS makes a notable difference in stabilizing telephoto shots at 130mm equivalent, preventing blur from shaky hands.
Lens-wise, Casio’s 28-112mm F2.6-5.8 is reasonably bright at wide angle but falls off at the tele end. Sony’s 26-130mm F3.5-4.8 is slower but covers a more versatile zoom range for travel to everyday snaps.
For portraits, neither lens is optimized for ultra shallow depth of field, but the Sony’s sharper images and better macro focus bring more usable bokeh and detail - vital for subjects and close-up creativity.
Shooting Adventures: Real-World Performance in Photography Genres
Understanding how these cameras perform across photography types is where my lab testing aligns with street experience.
Portraits
Sony’s sharper sensor and cleaner JPEGs render skin tone better, though both cameras lack face or eye detection, so focus-hunting is a potential pain point. Casio’s lens offers slightly brighter aperture on the wide end, helping backgrounds blur modestly, but chromatic aberrations creep in. Sony’s detail handling makes post-crop portraits more forgiving for enthusiasts.
Landscape
Dynamic range is limited on both, but Sony’s BSI sensor preserves midtones and shadows better - critical for outdoors with high-contrast scenes. Resolution-wise, the TX55's 16MP pushes slightly more detail. Neither model is weather sealed, so caution shooting outdoors in challenging environments is advised.
Wildlife and Sports
Neither compact is designed for fast action. They share a max 10 fps burst mode but autofocus is not continuous, throttling tracking efficiency. The Sony’s faster autofocus and longer zoom help for casual wildlife; Casio's slower and narrower zoom disappoints here.
Street Photography
Sony’s stealthy ultracompact size and quick autofocus stem it better for candid street shooting, though no silent shutter mode means a little shutter sound always. Casio feels more intrusive, larger, and slower, which might spook off subjects.
Macro
A big win for Sony here: 3cm minimum focusing beats Casio’s 10cm, opening more creative close-up options. Coupled with stabilizer and higher resolution, the TX55 is great for casual macro.
Night/Astro
Sony’s higher ISO ceiling and better low-light sensor give it the edge for night shots, though small sensors mean heavy noise above ISO 800. Built-in flash performance is comparable but limited in range and harshness.
Video Shooting Capabilities: Moving Pictures Matter
Sony’s video abilities outshine Casio’s by a mile. TX55 offers:
- Full HD 1080p @ 60fps
- AVCHD and MPEG-4 encoded footage
- Optical stabilization for smoother clips
- HDMI output for external monitoring
Casio EX-Z450 tops out at 720p @ 24fps in Motion JPEG with no stabilization or HDMI out. For casual video enthusiasts, Sony’s footage is more usable; Casio’s video is mostly 'nice to have' on the side.
Power, Connectivity, and Storage: How Long and How Connected?
Battery life: Sony rates around 250 shots per charge (NP-BN battery), which is solid for a compact. Casio’s NP-40 battery lacks official numbers, but anecdotal experience suggests lower longevity.
Both support SD cards (Sony adds microSD and proprietary Memory Stick Micro). USB 2.0 connects both to PCs, but only Sony features HDMI out.
Wireless-wise, both were early adopters of Eye-Fi card compatibility for Wi-Fi transfers but lack Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS.
Build Quality and Durability: Rugged or Treat With Care?
Neither camera offers weather or dust sealing, impact resistance, or freezeproof design. These compacts should be handled gently, shielded from environmental extremes.
Price and Value: Budget Brainstorming
At launch, the Casio EX-Z450 was around $229 and the Sony TX55 $350. Adjusted for inflation and current used prices, they fall into entry-level compact bracket.
As a cheapskate myself, the Casio is a modestly priced beginner option for casual shooters who want simplicity and decent photos in good light, whereas the Sony demands a premium but rewards it with sharper images, sharper screen, and video versatility.
Summary Scores and Final Recommendations
This figure (my scoring composite from dozens of test criteria) shows the Sony TX55 notably outperforms the EX-Z450 in image quality, video, and user experience. The Casio's modest score roots in dated sensor and limited features.
Across specific photography genres, Sony leads especially in macro, landscapes, and video. Casio holds modest ground in low complexity, daylight shooting.
Who Should Buy Which?
Use Case | My Recommendation |
---|---|
Beginner Casual Shooters | Casio EX-Z450 for budget simplicity and compact handling |
Travel and Street Shooters | Sony TX55 for portability, sharper images, better video |
Macro Hobbyists | Sony TX55 for superior close-up focus and detail |
Video Content Creators | Sony TX55 for Full HD video and optical stabilization |
Budget-Conscious Collectors | Casio EX-Z450 for cheap, basic shooting at resale prices |
Final Thoughts – Having Tested Thousands of Cameras
Both the Casio EX-Z450 and Sony TX55 deliver classic small sensor compact experiences, albeit from slightly different design intentions and technology generations. The Casio feels like a friendly, simple point-and-shoot for casual family photos or beginners, while the Sony pushes boundaries with better sensor tech, interface polish, and multimedia versatility - a compact enthusiast’s companion.
If you want excellent image quality, more video features, and a future-proofed user interface - and you can stretch the budget - the Sony TX55 is worth hunting down. If you need the cheapest, fuss-free option for snapshots and like a bit of chunk in your pocket, Casio EX-Z450 still holds value in its simplicity.
Remember, neither camera competes with modern smartphones or mirrorless rigs in today’s landscape. But they do offer charming portals into photography fundamentals with a few quirks - perfect for those learning, traveling light, or nostalgia buffing.
Hope this side-by-side walkthrough helps you make your next compact camera choice with confidence - happy shooting!
Additional Images and Context for Reference
- For physical and control layout details:
,
- For sensor and image quality technical grounding:
- For interface and usability contrast:
- For visual proof of output quality:
- For overall and specialty performance evaluation: ,
Casio EX-Z450 vs Sony TX55 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-08-18 | 2011-07-24 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | XtraFine OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 128g (0.28 lbs) | 109g (0.24 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 81 x 56 x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/SDHC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $229 | $350 |