Casio EX-Z550 vs Sigma DP2x
95 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31


86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Casio EX-Z550 vs Sigma DP2x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 143g - 99 x 53 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP2s

Casio EX-Z550 vs Sigma DP2x: An Expert’s Hands-On Comparison of Two Distinct Compact Cameras
In a world flooded with cameras vying for our attention, I find it invaluable to dig past specs on paper and uncover how cameras truly behave in the field. Today, I’m putting the spotlight on two compact cameras from a decade ago that found their own niches - the casual yet versatile Casio EX-Z550 ultracompact, and the niche-focused, large-sensor Sigma DP2x. Both were announced around 2010–2011, but offer starkly different approaches to compact photography. Having tested and used these models extensively over years, I’ll walk you through how they perform across multiple photography disciplines, technical nuances, and ultimately who they were (and still are) best suited for.
For clarity, I’ve integrated their physical and technical profiles here:
Compact vs. Large Sensor: A Foundation of Image Quality
At the heart of any camera’s image quality lies its sensor - its "eye". The Casio EX-Z550 employs a small 1/2.3" CCD sensor measuring just 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm²), with a 14-megapixel resolution. On the other hand, the Sigma DP2x uses an APS-C sized Foveon X3 CMOS sensor at 20.7 x 13.8 mm (285.66 mm²) but only offers 5 megapixels in its unique layered design.
While megapixels alone don't tell the whole story, sensor size is a massive differentiator here. The DP2x’s sensor area is over 10 times larger, offering potential for much richer detail, better depth of field control, and dynamic range.
From my extensive testing, the Sigma’s sensor delivers remarkable color depth and subtlety thanks to the Foveon technology, often outperforming many standard Bayer sensors in tonal accuracy. However, its lower resolution and slower processing mean it struggles with fast action or burst modes.
Casio’s CCD sensor boosts resolution, but at the expense of control over bokeh and noise performance. Images can tend to look a bit "busy" in shadow areas at higher ISO. Still, for everyday casual shooting and daylight environments, the EX-Z550 can produce crisp images thanks to its higher native resolution and 4x zoom versatility.
Design and Build: Portability Meets Practicality
As an enthusiast who carries cameras in varied scenarios, ergonomics and portability are paramount. The Casio EX-Z550 is a sleek ultracompact weighing only 143 grams and measuring 99 x 53 x 20 mm. It fits snugly into a pocket, making it an attractive companion for spontaneous street photography and travel snaps.
The Sigma DP2x is noticeably larger and bulkier, at 280 grams and 113 x 60 x 56 mm, almost twice the thickness. Its shape and heft feel more serious, positioned towards deliberate framing and slower, contemplative shooting.
Looking from above, the EX-Z550’s controls are minimal and quite simplified – no manual exposure modes or shutter/aperture priority, in line with its aim for point-and-shoot ease. The DP2x offers aperture priority and shutter priority alongside manual, reflecting a camera designed for photographers who want direct creative control and are comfortable with more deliberate setups.
Neither camera features optical or electronic viewfinders, relying entirely on their LCDs for composition.
Screen and Interface: Viewing and Composing
Both cameras have fixed screens at around 2.5 – 2.7 inches, with a resolution of 230k dots. I find these to be adequate for framing but not ideal for pixel-level focusing confirmation, especially on the Casio’s smaller panel. The Sigma’s screen, while similar in specs, feels a little more robust and accurate in color representation, lending itself better to assessing exposure on the spot.
The EX-Z550’s interface is straightforward but basic, with limited manual adjustments and no touch functionality, typical for its ultracompact era. The DP2x, while not touchscreen-enabled either, offers more menu options conducive to experienced users tweaking exposure compensation and white balance settings according to their vision.
Autofocus and Performance in the Field
The Casio EX-Z550 relies on contrast-detection autofocus, single-point only, without face or eye detection, and no continuous AF. This is a key limitation when shooting fast-moving subjects, but it copes well for portraits and landscapes with static subjects.
In contrast, the Sigma DP2x also uses contrast detection but offers a bit more customization in focus settings and slower but more deliberate focusing behavior reflecting its large sensor and slower processor. It shoots only 3 frames per second max burst - no modern high-speed tracking here.
Real-world, on portrait shoots, the Casio can struggle to lock focus quickly in low contrast scenarios, often hunting noticeably. The Sigma, while slower, delivers precise focus locks especially good for static portraits with shallow depth of field offered by its 41mm foveon lens.
Versatility in Focal Range and Lenses
The Casio EX-Z550 sports a 26-104mm (35mm equivalent) zoom lens at f/2.6-5.9 aperture, giving users 4x zoom flexibility. This is a boon for travel and street photographers who want quick focal length switching without lens changes.
The Sigma DP2x’s fixed 41mm f/2.8 lens offers no zoom but instead delivers superb image quality thanks to its prime glass optimized for the Foveon sensor. The full-frame equivalent focal length is about 41mm given the 1.7x crop factor.
I often found the Casio’s zoom tempting for casual landscapes or candid moments, but image quality softens significantly toward the telephoto end. The Sigma encourages a more thoughtful framing approach, relying on cropping in post rather than zoom.
Image Stabilization and Low-Light Performance
An important advantage for the Casio EX-Z550 is its sensor-shift image stabilization. While not as sophisticated as modern optical IS, it helps achieve sharper handheld shots in dimmer conditions or at longer focal lengths. Conversely, the Sigma DP2x includes no form of image stabilization, a notable downside if you often shoot handheld beyond bright daylight.
Regarding ISO sensitivity, both max out around ISO 3200, but in practical terms, the Sigma’s larger sensor handles noise remarkably better at higher ISOs, retaining tonal gradients and details. The EX-Z550’s smaller sensor suffers from noise blotching above ISO 400, limiting its usable range outdoors in poor light.
Video Capabilities: Basic but Serviceable
Neither of these cameras excels in video. The Casio EX-Z550 maxes at 1280x720 with Motion JPEG codec, providing simple HD video recording. The Sigma DP2x offers even lower resolution video (320x240) - really a supplementary feature at best.
If video is a priority, neither camera would be my go-to choice. They are firmly designed with still photography as the focal point.
Battery and Storage
From personal experience, both cameras offer modest battery life due to their vintage designs and compact sizes. Neither model uses widely available standardized batteries but proprietary ones, making spares somewhat niche and recommended for extended outings.
Both accept SD/SDHC cards, secure and reliable, with single card slot implementation typical for compacts of their era.
Real-World Photography Disciplines Explored
Now that we've dismantled the core hardware, let's delve into how these cameras handle various photography genres in the field - all tested under diverse conditions through repeated shoots.
Portrait Photography: Capturing Life’s Details
Portraiture demands accurate skin tone rendition, creamy bokeh to isolate subjects, and reliable autofocus on eyes.
-
Casio EX-Z550: The smaller sensor and fixed lens aperture range limit shallow depth-of-field effects, producing portraits that are tack sharp but less "filmic". Colors skew slightly cool, and in absence of face/eye detection AF, there's a learning curve to nail tack-sharp eyes. Its image stabilization helps handheld shooting, but overall it feels less capable for portraits aspiring toward professional quality.
-
Sigma DP2x: This truly shines in portraiture thanks to its larger sensor and the Foveon sensor’s exceptional color fidelity. Despite only 5 MP, the output contains breathtaking detail, natural skin tones, and soft bokeh that isolates subjects gracefully. Manual focus, while slower, can be precise with practice. Unfortunately, no face detection exists - expect a more deliberate shooting style.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Resolution
Landscapes prize high resolution for large prints and rich dynamic range for detail in shadows and highlights.
-
Casio EX-Z550: While boasting higher megapixels, the sensor’s dynamic range is limited, often resulting in blown highlights in bright scenes or crushed shadows. Its 4:3 aspect ratio offers versatile cropping, but image quality tapers towards telephoto settings.
-
Sigma DP2x: The large APS-C Foveon sensor provides exceptional color depth and shadow detail, making it my preference for landscapes here. Though only 5 MP might seem low, the image quality is excellent when printing modest sizes. The fixed prime inspired me to hunt and frame meticulously versus rapid zooming.
Wildlife and Sports: Need for Speed
Fast autofocus, rapid shooting, and tracking accuracy are king.
Neither camera is made for wildlife or sports.
-
Casio EX-Z550 lacks continuous autofocus, burst shooting, and has a slow maximum shutter speed (1/2000 sec) that cramped my action shots in bright light.
-
Sigma DP2x with 3 fps burst and manual focus options fares no better. Its slower processing and fixed focal length hamper versatility.
Wildlife and sports photographers will want to look elsewhere.
Street Photography: Discretion and Quick Operation
Street photography benefits from pocketability, silent operation, and rapid focusing.
The Casio EX-Z550 is very pocketable and quick to turn on, but the loud zoom and slower AF detracts from shooting candid moments.
The Sigma DP2x is less discreet due to size and noisier aperture operation, plus slower startup, but yields higher quality images - ideal for photographers willing to sacrifice speed for quality.
Macro Photography: Precision Focus and Magnification
Neither camera targets macro specifically.
The Casio has no official macro focus range info, and its autofocus is contrast-based, with limited close focusing ability.
The Sigma’s manual focus allows some closeups, but lens length and minimum focusing distance limit magnification potential.
Night and Astro Photography: High ISO and Exposure Modes
For night scenes, low noise and long exposure capabilities matter.
The Sigma supports shutter priority, aperture priority, and long exposures down to 15 seconds, suitable for night photography with a tripod.
The Casio’s minimum shutter speed of 4 seconds and lack of manual modes restricts long exposure creativity.
ISO noise favors the Sigma’s larger sensor here.
Video for Vlogging or Documentaries
Video performance on both cameras is rudimentary at best - neither supports external mics, and resolutions top out at 720p for Casio and low-res 320p for Sigma.
Travel Photography: Versatility and Battery
Casio’s ultracompact design and zoom versatility make it an approachable travel companion for casual tourists.
Sigma’s size and deliberate shooting style suit more serious travelers who prioritize image quality over speed.
Neither has stellar battery longevity, but Casio’s lighter weight makes longer strolls easier.
Professional Use and Workflow
Sigma’s raw support and manual controls provide a better fit for pros than Casio’s JPEG-only, limited exposure control.
Both lack weather sealing - a consideration for professional reliability.
Sample Images from Both Cameras in the Field
Here you can see the Casio’s wider zoom range capturing candid street corners and detailed landscapes. The Sigma’s strengths lie in portraits and still life with superior tonal gradation and subtle bokeh.
Ratings and Overall Performance Breakdown
Overall, the Sigma DP2x scores higher in image quality and creative control. The Casio EX-Z550 wins on portability, zoom flexibility, and casual ease of use.
Genre-Specific Analysis: Where Do They Shine?
- Casio EX-Z550: Great for travel snapshots, casual street shooting, and easy macro-ish photography.
- Sigma DP2x: Excellent for portrait, landscape, and low-light enthusiasts valuing color fidelity and manual control.
Final Takeaways: Who Should Choose Which?
If you want a pocket-friendly, versatile compact camera for everyday casual shooting, travel, and easy sharing, the Casio EX-Z550 is a neat grab - especially on a budget.
If you prioritize image quality above all, are comfortable with manual exposure, and desire a large sensor compact with excellent color rendition for portraits or landscapes, and don’t mind slower operation, the Sigma DP2x is a worthy pick.
For wildlife, sports, video-heavy usage, or higher ISO low-light dominance, I recommend looking at more modern, specialized gear.
As someone who has tested thousands of cameras, I advise balancing your desires for portability, image quality, creative control, and budget. Both cameras exemplify very different design priorities from their era.
Thanks for reading my deep dive. I hope my experience encourages you to find the right camera that fits both your photography passion and practical needs.
Happy shooting!
Casio EX-Z550 vs Sigma DP2x Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z550 | Sigma DP2x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z550 | Sigma DP2x |
Type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 5MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2640 x 1760 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 15s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 | 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 320x240 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 143 grams (0.32 pounds) | 280 grams (0.62 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 53 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/MMC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $149 | $699 |