Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
56 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 850g - 142 x 131 x 80mm
- Introduced August 2002
- Succeeded the Fujifilm S1 Pro
- Replacement is Fujifilm S3 Pro
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-Z800 versus Fujifilm S2 Pro, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Pro DSLR by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and Fujifilm S2 Pro (6MP) and the EX-Z800 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm S2 Pro (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z800 was released 8 years after the Fujifilm S2 Pro which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S2 Pro being a Large SLR camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-Z800 matches up versus the Fujifilm S2 Pro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Fujifilm S2 Pro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Fujifilm S2 Pro
| EX-Z800 | Fujifilm S2 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2010 |  | August 2002 | Newer by 98 months |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 117k | Clearer display (+113k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2 Pro over the Casio EX-Z800
| Fujifilm S2 Pro | EX-Z800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Fujifilm S2 Pro
| EX-Z800 | Fujifilm S2 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z800 comes with outer measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Fujifilm S2 Pro has specifications of 142mm x 131mm x 80mm (5.6" x 5.2" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 850 grams (1.87 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z800 versus Fujifilm S2 Pro in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z800 against the Fujifilm S2 Pro.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z800 and Fujifilm S2 Pro is 96 and 56 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing technical specs. The picture below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z800 and Fujifilm S2 Pro.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z800 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Casio EX-Z800 will offer more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The more modern EX-Z800 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro |
| Type | Ultracompact | Pro DSLR |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2002-08-02 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Large SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23 x 15.5mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 356.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4256 x 2848 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Nikon F |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 309 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 117 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 92% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 15.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/125s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 850 gr (1.87 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 142 x 131 x 80mm (5.6" x 5.2" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 5, 2 or 100 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SmartMedia, Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $150 | $2,000 |
