Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 III
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Introduced March 2016
- Replaced the Sony RX10 II
- Later Model is Sony RX10 IV
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 III, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") posses different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VR-320 was released 5 years before the RX10 III which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the VR-320 matches up against the RX10 III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony RX10 III
VR-320 | RX10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus VR-320
RX10 III | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2016 | July 2011 | More modern by 57 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Clearer screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony RX10 III
VR-320 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 provides external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") along with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the VR-320 and the RX10 III.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and RX10 III is 94 and 53 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The picture here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and RX10 III.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The VR-320 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Sony RX10 III will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2016-03-29 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 14.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 1051 gr (2.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $179 | $1,398 |