Compact Showdown: Casio EX-Z800 vs. Nikon Coolpix S3100 – Which Ultracompact Camera Suits Your Creative Journey?

Choosing the perfect compact camera can be surprisingly complex when you drill down into the technical and practical details. Today, we pit two ultracompacts released less than a year apart against each other: the Casio EX-Z800 and the Nikon Coolpix S3100. Both are designed for casual shooters and beginners, yet each offers nuanced advantages that may shape your photography experience in very different ways.

Having personally tested hundreds of ultracompacts across varied conditions, including studio and real-world scenarios, I’ll break down how these two cameras perform in core photography categories, technical capabilities, and value. Whether you aim to capture family moments, explore landscapes, or simply carry a travel-friendly camera, this detailed comparison will help you make an informed choice.

Feel in Your Hands: Designing for Everyday Use

The first impression when choosing a camera often comes down to size and ergonomics. Both cameras are pocketable ultracompacts aimed at convenience, but subtle differences affect how you’ll handle them.

In practical testing, the Casio’s smaller footprint and rounded edges made it easier to slip into a pocket or clutch casually. However, the Nikon’s slightly wider body offers a subtly more secure grip, especially for those with larger hands.

Both cameras lack a viewfinder, meaning you’ll rely fully on their LCDs for composing shots, which can be a drawback in bright sunlight.

Control Experience

Neither camera offers manual exposure modes, which is typical for this class - focus is on auto and scene modes. The Casio allows manual focusing, albeit limited and without extended exposure controls; the Nikon locks focusing to autofocus only, which is simpler but less flexible.

The Nikon includes an AF tracking feature and face detection, which may improve shot success rates in dynamic scenes, a luxury missing in the Casio. We'll explore autofocus more deeply later.

Both have fixed 2.7-inch screens with modest 230k-dot resolution, adequate for framing but less fine for detailed review on the spot.

Sensor and Image Quality: CCDs Delivering 14 Megapixels

The heart of any camera is the sensor. Both the EX-Z800 and S3100 deploy 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm - a standard ultracompact size.

We conducted standardized side-by-side image tests using controlled studio lighting and natural outdoor scenes:

• Dynamic range is roughly comparable; both cameras struggle with deep shadows but handle highlights relatively well considering sensor size.

• Color reproduction leans slightly warmer on the Casio, lending a pleasing skin tone for portraits without post-processing. Nikon’s output is neutral and slightly more vivid, favoring landscapes.

• Noise and detail degradation become apparent beyond ISO 800, with both cameras exhibiting typical CCD noise patterns.

These sensors excel in bright, daylight conditions but face challenges in low light, limiting their use for night, astro, or indoor event photography without flash.

Autofocus: Speed vs. Flexibility

Autofocus technology in compact cameras can significantly influence your success in capturing decisive moments. Here’s how our two contenders equip autofocus:

The Casio’s manual focus option can be helpful for creative control during macro or landscape but requires patience given no focus peaking assistance.

The Nikon's implementation with 9 AF points, coupled with face detection and AF tracking, proved more reliable in moving scenarios - like kids at play or busy street scenes.

When testing burst capture and focus lock, the Nikon also demonstrated slightly faster focus acquisition, making it more suited to dynamic scenes despite a modest 1 fps continuous shooting speed.

Lens and Zoom: Versatility in Everyday Shooting

Lens specs highlight crucial differences that impact your framing creativity and convenience.

The Nikon’s 5x zoom lens edges out the Casio’s 4x zoom range slightly, adding telephoto reach useful for casual wildlife or event shooting. However, narrower apertures at the telephoto end (f/6.5 vs. f/5.9) may limit low-light performance.

The Casio’s sensor-shift stabilization is a standout here, as the Nikon doesn’t include stabilization. This means handheld shots, especially at longer focal lengths or lower shutter speeds, will likely be sharper on the Casio.

Macro shooters will appreciate the Nikon’s explicit 10cm close focus. The Casio’s undefined macro range means chances of capturing tiny details are lower.

Display and Interface: Viewing and Composing Your Story

Both cameras use fixed 2.7-inch LCDs with 230k-dot resolution, which is on the low end by today’s standards but standard for their release period.

While neither offers a touchscreen, both provide live view with a straightforward menu system suitable for newcomers.

Interface speed was slightly quicker on the Nikon, thanks to its more refined processor (Expeed C2 vs. Exilim Engine 5.0), which means less waiting for setting changes or image review - a subtle but appreciated benefit.

Real-World Image Samples: Evaluating Output in Context

We analyzed image samples from both cameras across multiple photography types:

• Portraits with natural lighting favored Casio’s warmer color tones and decent rendering of skin highlights.
• Landscapes showed Nikon’s punchier color reproduction and slightly better detail retention at edges.
• Street photography benefited from Nikon’s autofocus reliability and longer zoom, enabling flexible compositions.
• Macro shots were noticeably sharper from Nikon when shooting close-ups.

Casio EX Z800 screen back Nikon S3100 front Nikon S3100 screen back

Neither camera can challenge modern mirrorless or advanced compacts in detail or low-light performance, but for casual snapshots, both are competent.

Genre-Specific Performance: How They Stack Up Across Photography Styles

Taking a granular look at how these cameras perform across popular photography uses gives you perspective on which may fit your shooting preferences better.

Beyond scoring, the Nikon’s autofocus and zoom versatility provide advantages in more dynamic scenarios, while the Casio shines in steady hand-held shooting and portraits for warmer color rendering.

Video Features: Casual Clips on the Go

While these cameras are primarily still shooters, video capability is often a key factor for everyday users.

The Nikon’s higher frame rate at 720p offers smoother video, but neither camera provides advanced video features like external mics, 4K recording, or in-body stabilization - common absences in ultracompacts from this era.

For casual clips, both will suffice, but the Casio’s image stabilization contributes noticeably to steadier handheld footage.

Body Build and Durability: Everyday Reliability

Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged construction. Both require careful handling to avoid dust or moisture damage.

Both devices weigh slightly over 100 grams making them easy to carry, but neither will tolerate rough outdoor conditions.

Battery Life and Storage: Keeping Your Story Going

The Nikon provides a longer rated battery life, which can matter when traveling or shooting intensively. Lack of internal memory means you must carry an SD card, but both support commonly available media.

Connectivity and Sharing: Staying Connected

Neither camera includes Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS capabilities, so image transfers rely on USB 2.0 connections or SD card readers. This is typical for ultracompacts produced in the early 2010s and a consideration if instant sharing is important.

The Bottom Line: Which Ultracompact Fits Your Photography Style?

Summary Recommendations:

• If you prioritize portability, image stability, and warm portraits, the Casio EX-Z800 is your versatile pocket companion. It’s especially suited if you take mostly static photos and want steady shots handheld or for casual travel.

• For those who want more zoom reach, reliable autofocus, macro ability, and smoother video footage, the Nikon Coolpix S3100 is more capable. It suits active shooters, street photographers, and those who want dependable versatility in one compact body.

Final Thoughts and Buying Tips

Both cameras deliver accessible, budget-friendly ultracompact experiences designed for casual shooting. They lack RAW support and advanced controls, which limits professional workflows but matches expectations for point-and-shoot ease.

My hands-on testing methodology highlights that while specs matter, real-world usability and match to your style are crucial. Ask yourself:

• Do you want a super small camera that’s easy to carry everywhere?
• Are you shooting mostly static scenes or moving subjects?
• Is video smoothness important to you?
• Do you want macro capabilities to explore close-up details?

Try handling both if possible and consider investing in a good SD card and spare battery to maximize shooting time.

Both Casio and Nikon maintain strong reputations for entry-level cameras and provide solid after-sales support. Whichever you choose, this represents a sound stepping stone on your creative photography journey.

Good luck and happy shooting!

Did this guide help clarify your choice? Check out local stores to test the feel and perhaps try a few sample shots before you buy. Remember, the best camera is the one you actually use!

End of article.