Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB250F
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-Z800 versus Samsung WB250F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z800 was revealed 3 years before the WB250F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z800 matches up vs the WB250F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-Z800 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-Z800
| WB250F | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 29 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-Z800 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z800 enjoys outside dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z800 versus Samsung WB250F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z800 and the WB250F.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z800 and WB250F is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specifications. The image underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z800 and WB250F.
Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution so you can expect comparable quality of files although you have to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-Z800 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB250F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $150 | $250 |
