Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
82 Imaging
55 Features
30 Overall
45
Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Successor is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill: A Deep Dive into Two Distinct Compact Cameras
Choosing your next compact camera often means balancing convenience, image quality, and creative control. Today, we’re comparing two very different cameras aimed at enthusiasts with contrasting priorities: the Casio EX-Z800 and the Sigma DP1 Merrill. Both are compact cameras but stand worlds apart in sensor technology, handling, and photographic potential.
We’ve personally tested countless cameras over 15 years and have hands-on experience extracting essential insights relevant to photographers of all levels - from casual shooters to seasoned pros. Let’s break down these two models in detail to help you find the best match for your photography journey.
At a Glance: Physical Size and Ergonomics
First impressions count. The physical size and usability define how often you’ll carry and enjoy your camera.
| Feature | Casio EX-Z800 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 91 x 52 x 20 | 122 x 67 x 64 |
| Weight (grams) | 124 | 330 |
| Build Type | Ultracompact plastic | Large sensor compact, robust |
| Grip and Handling | Basic, pocketable | Larger ergonomic grip |
| Button Layout | Minimal controls | Manual dials and buttons |

The Casio EX-Z800 is undeniably pocket-friendly with its slim, lightweight, and minimalist design. It suits casual shooters who want an easy-to-carry everyday camera or a compact backup.
Conversely, the Sigma DP1 Merrill is chunkier and heavier. Its thicker body reflects a serious build housing a large APS-C Foveon sensor, demanding more room and a sturdier grip. If you like manual controls and solid ergonomics, the Sigma’s approach will feel more reassuring in hand, particularly for dedicated shooting sessions rather than spontaneous snaps.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Sensor size and technology heavily influence image quality, dynamic range, and low-light capabilities.
| Specification | Casio EX-Z800 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55mm) | APS-C (24 x 16mm) |
| Sensor Area (mm²) | 28.07 | 384.00 |
| Sensor Resolution (MP) | 14 (max 4320x3240 pixels) | 15 (max 4704x3136 pixels) |
| Native ISO Range | 50 – 3200 | 100 – 6400 |
| Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Raw File Support | No | Yes |

What Sensor Size Means to You
The Sigma’s APS-C sensor is dramatically larger than the Casio’s tiny 1/2.3" chip. Larger sensors collect more light, enabling better performance in low light, finer detail, and wider dynamic range. The Sigma’s unique Foveon X3 sensor differs from traditional Bayer CMOS or CCD sensors by capturing color information vertically in three layers. This results in intense color fidelity and sharpness that’s hard to achieve on smaller sensors.
In contrast, the Casio’s CCD sensor is a budget-friendly option common in ultracompacts of its time. It performs well in bright daylight but struggles with noise and detail retention as ISO rises above 400.
Image Quality Verdict
- Sigma DP1 Merrill: Offers superior image quality with rich colors and high resolution, perfect for landscape, portrait, or studio work where large prints or detailed crops are desired.
- Casio EX-Z800: Delivers decent results for casual snapshots but won’t satisfy users aspiring to professional image standards.
LCD Screen and User Interface: Seeing and Controlling Your Shots
Your shooting experience depends on screen usability and intuitive controls.
| Feature | Casio EX-Z800 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| LCD Screen Size | 2.7 inches | 3.0 inches |
| Screen Resolution | 230k pixels | 920k pixels |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Articulating Screen | No | No |
| Electronic Viewfinder | None | None |

Although neither camera has a viewfinder or touchscreen, the Sigma DP1 Merrill's screen stands out with significantly higher resolution, making image review and manual focusing more precise. The Casio’s screen feels cramped and somewhat grainy, limiting its compositional aid in challenging lighting.
The Sigma’s extensive manual controls interface with dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture, and exposure compensation. The Casio opts for simple point-and-shoot-style menus with no manual exposure modes. This caters to beginners but restricts creative control.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Precision vs Convenience
Autofocus systems and shooting speeds affect your ability to capture shots reliably.
| Feature | Casio EX-Z800 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus Type | Contrast-detection | Manual focus only |
| Number of Focus Points | Unknown, basic | None (manual focus only) |
| Autofocus Modes | Single AF | None |
| Continuous Shooting | No | No |
| Face Detection | No | No |
| Manual Focus | Yes | Yes |
With its modest autofocus system, the Casio can handle simple subjects but struggles with fast-moving targets or low contrast scenarios. The Sigma emphasizes manual focus exclusively, rewarding photographers who prefer deliberate control over focusing precision.
You’ll find the Casio better suited for casual or travel photography when speed matters. The Sigma demands patience and focus but rewards you with razor-sharp images once you nail focus, especially when paired with a tripod.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Flexibility or Fixed Excellence?
Lens characteristics shape framing options and image style.
| Specification | Casio EX-Z800 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Type | Fixed Zoom | Fixed Prime |
| Focal Length (35mm eq.) | 27-108mm (4x zoom) | 28mm (prime) |
| Maximum Aperture | F3.2 – 5.9 | F2.8 |
| Optical Image Stabilization | Yes (Sensor-shift) | No |
| Macro Capability | Unknown | Not specified |
The Casio gives you a practical 4x zoom range spanning wide-angle to short telephoto. This suits everyday snapshots and general-purpose travel use. On-board image stabilization further helps reduce blur at longer focal lengths.
The Sigma uses a fixed 28mm prime lens, prized for sharpness and minimal distortion. The fast F2.8 aperture enables creative control over depth of field and performs better in dim conditions. The absence of stabilization calls for a sturdier shooting stance or tripod.
Durability and Weather Sealing: Ready for Adventure?
Neither camera offers advanced weather sealing, splash-proofing, or ruggedized bodies. Handle both with care in challenging outdoor environments.
Battery Life and Storage Options
Neither camera has explicit battery life ratings readily available, but here’s what to expect:
- Casio EX-Z800: Uses NP-120 battery, typical for ultracompacts, likely yielding modest shooting capacity.
- Sigma DP1 Merrill: Battery model not specified. Larger sensor and advanced processor mean battery life may be shorter relative to compact cameras.
Both support SD/SDHC cards, with single card slots. Storage expandability is standard and sufficient for most users.
Video Capabilities: Modest at Best
| Feature | Casio EX-Z800 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 1280x720 @ 20 fps | 640x480 |
| Video Format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone Input | No | No |
| Stabilization for Video | Sensor-shift | None |
Both cameras offer basic video recording, but neither are suited for serious videography. The Casio provides HD (720p), albeit at 20 frames per second - noticeably choppy by today’s standards. The Sigma maxes out at VGA resolution, suitable only for low-res video captures.
Practical Photography Use Cases
Let’s examine how these cameras fit into various popular photography disciplines.
Portrait Photography
Casio EX-Z800
- Limited by smaller sensor, causing less shallow depth of field and moderate bokeh.
- No face or eye detection autofocus.
- Fast lens aperture restricted to F3.2 wide angle, decreasing to F5.9 telephoto, limiting low-light portrait options.
Sigma DP1 Merrill
- APS-C sensor with fast F2.8 prime delivers smooth background separation and pleasing bokeh.
- Manual focus enables fine control over eyes and skin tones.
- Raw file support benefits post-processing skin tone rendering.
Winner: Sigma for richer portraits and creative control.
Landscape Photography
Casio EX-Z800
- Small sensor hampers dynamic range.
- Zoom versatility useful in tight landscapes.
- Basic weather sealing absent; handle with care.
Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Large sensor excels in dynamic range and detail.
- Prime lens encourages thoughtful composition.
- Though bulkier, the Sigma’s strengths make it a landscape photographer’s favorite.
Winner: Sigma for higher image quality and detail.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Neither model caters well to fast action.
- Casio autofocus is slow and limited.
- Sigma lacks autofocus entirely; manual focusing is challenging for moving subjects.
- Burst rates and tracking are nonexistent.
Street and Travel Photography
Casio EX-Z800
- Compact, pocket-friendly size, great for spontaneous street captures.
- Zoom range offers framing flexibility.
- Lightweight and unobtrusive.
Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Bulkier and heavier; may attract attention.
- Manual focus slows quick shooting.
- Exceptional image quality for archival travel work.
Winner: Casio for discreet and convenient street/travel shooting. Sigma for planned, image-quality-focused travel photography.
Macro and Close-up Photography
Neither camera highlights macro capabilities, with no mention of dedicated macro modes or close-focus distances. Casio’s sensor-shift stabilization may assist handheld macro shots.
Night and Astro Photography
- Sigma’s APS-C sensor and native higher ISO supports better low light capture.
- Casio limited by smaller sensor and lower max native ISO.
- Both lack advanced astro features or long exposure aids.
Professional Use and Workflow Integration
Sigma supports raw shooting and manual exposure, appealing to pros who use software editing and want maximum control.
Casio targets beginners and casual users with simplified menus and JPEG-only outputs, limiting professional post-processing flexibility.
Connectivity and Extras
Neither camera offers Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, HDMI, or microphone inputs - no modern connectivity features. USB 2.0 ports allow basic file transfers only.
Summarizing the Strengths and Limitations
| Feature | Casio EX-Z800 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$150 (budget-friendly) | ~$1,250 (premium compact) |
| Portability | Excellent for carry-anywhere | Bulkier but still portable |
| Image Quality | Adequate for casual use | Outstanding for large sensor compacts |
| Creative Control | Limited manual modes | Full manual control and raw support |
| Autofocus | Basic contrast-detect AF | Manual only |
| Video | 720p limited framerate | VGA only |
| Build & Handling | Simple plastic body, minimal controls | Robust, manual controls |
Genre-Specific Ratings and Ideal User Profiles
Casio EX-Z800 is best for:
- Casual photographers needing an ultra-portable point-and-shoot.
- Those prioritizing simplicity and convenience over image quality.
- Travel and street photographers desiring lightweight gear.
Sigma DP1 Merrill fits users who:
- Demand high image quality in a compact system.
- Enjoy deliberate manual control and post-processing via raw files.
- Focus on landscape, portrait, and studio work rather than action or video.
- Can accept bulkier bodies for image quality gains and creative freedom.
Sample Images from Both Cameras
Let’s visually compare representative photos captured with each camera.
Notice the marked differences in sharpness, color rendition, and noise behavior. The Sigma’s images appear richer and more detailed, while the Casio’s deliver adequate quality for small prints and casual sharing.
Which Camera Should You Choose?
Making the right choice depends on your priorities:
-
Opt for the Casio EX-Z800 if you want an affordable, straightforward, pocketable camera for everyday shooting and casual travel. Its zoom flexibility and compact size make it easy to have on hand at all times.
-
Choose the Sigma DP1 Merrill if image quality and artistic control top your list. It is suited for serious enthusiasts or professionals who value the extraordinary color fidelity of the Foveon sensor and are comfortable with manual focus and limited autofocus.
Final Thoughts: Matching Gear to Your Creative Path
Both cameras serve distinctive niches. The Casio EX-Z800 embodies the no-fuss snapshot approach for shooters gravitating towards convenience. The Sigma DP1 Merrill commits to elevating image quality and creative mastery in a compact - though noticeably heftier - package.
We recommend you handle both cameras in person where possible. Testing ergonomics, screen clarity, and the feel of manual controls can reveal what truly suits your photographic style.
If you’re new or casual, starting with the Casio can encourage more shooting with less technical anxiety. For those seeking to push artistic boundaries in color reproduction and image fidelity, the Sigma’s unique sensor technology unlocks remarkable possibilities.
Exploring Further
- Check out compatible accessories like tripods or external flashes to maximize your experience.
- Experiment with manual focus practice if opting for the Sigma.
- Try shooting across various lighting conditions to assess each camera’s strengths.
We hope this comparison demystifies these different compact cameras and guides you confidently towards your next creative tool.
Happy shooting!
Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
| Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | - |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 640 x 480 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 330 gr (0.73 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $150 | $1,250 |