Casio EX-Z800 vs Sony A580
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31


64 Imaging
56 Features
82 Overall
66
Casio EX-Z800 vs Sony A580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 599g - 137 x 104 x 84mm
- Revealed May 2011
- Replaced the Sony A100

Compact Snapper vs. Entry-Level Workhorse: Casio EX-Z800 and Sony A580 Face-Off
In the ever-crowded arena of digital cameras, today's buyers face a bewildering spectrum - from pocket-sized ultracompacts to hefty DSLRs built for the rigors of professional use. The Casio EX-Z800 and the Sony Alpha DSLR-A580 offer two drastically different takes on photography: one ultracompact and travel-friendly, the other an entry-level DSLR aimed at enthusiasts dipping their toes into interchangeable lenses and manual control. I've spent many hours putting both cameras through their paces, comparing them across a wide range of photo genres and technical parameters, to deliver an insightful evaluation that goes well beyond spec sheets.
Whether you want an affordable grab-and-go camera or a foundation for an expanding lens collection, this detailed comparison helps pinpoint where each shines - and where they fall short.
First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Design Philosophy
On first glance, the difference in physical presence is striking. The Casio EX-Z800 weighs a mere 124 grams and slips easily into your pocket, measuring 91 × 52 × 20 mm. This tiny ultracompact thrives on portability and ease-of-use. No complicated menus or heft to wrestle with - just point and shoot. Its fixed 27-108 mm lens spans a reasonable zoom range (4× optical) for casual snapshots, and the sensor-shift image stabilization helps limit blur in handheld photos. However, the control layout is minimal, lacking advanced customizability or external dials.
In contrast, the Sony A580 is a bona fide DSLR, weighing in at 599 grams with dimensions of 137 × 104 × 84 mm. It’s built to be held firmly for extended shooting sessions, with a robust grip, multiple customizable buttons, and a tilting 3-inch LCD that improves framing flexibility - especially for low- or high-angle shots. Despite its entry-level positioning, the A580 boasts the Sony/Minolta Alpha bayonet mount, compatible with over 140 lenses, providing immense creative freedom that the Casio simply cannot match.
Ergonomically, the Sony’s pronounced mode dial, shutter speed, and aperture priority controls, along with exposure compensation and manual modes, invite creative experimentation. The Casio, by contrast, caters to quick, automated snapshots with limited manual override - there’s hope for touch focus and face detection in better modern compacts, but the EX-Z800 offers none of that.
For photographers who appreciate a tactile experience, nuanced exposure control, and an evolving system, the A580 is clearly ahead. But for those prioritizing pocketability and simplicity, the EX-Z800 still holds appeal.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
The cameras’ sensors underscore their different ambitions. The Casio EX-Z800 employs a modest 1/2.3" CCD sensor with 14 megapixels of resolution, measuring roughly 6.17 × 4.55 mm. The Sony A580, meanwhile, features a much larger APS-C sized CMOS sensor, 23.5 × 15.6 mm, with 16 megapixels.
The sensor size difference is substantial - the Sony’s sensor area is over 13 times greater than Casio’s, which directly impacts image quality. Larger sensors gather more light, afford shallower depth of field for pleasing bokeh, and deliver superior dynamic range and noise control, especially at high ISO settings.
Based on prolonged testing, the Sony’s larger sensor and updated Bionz processor yield images with richer colors, finer detail, and lower noise at ISO 1600 and above - important for low-light, sports, and indoor shooting. The Casio’s CCD sensor, while good for daylight snaps, struggles beyond ISO 400, introducing pronounced grain and muted tones. The fixed aperture of F3.2-5.9 further limits shallow depth-of-field effects and low-light performance.
Additionally, the Casio does not support RAW files, restricting post-processing flexibility. The Sony impresses here with full 14-bit RAW capture, affording professionals and enthusiasts greater control over color grading and exposure tweaks.
Composing Your Shot: Viewfinders and Displays
Display technology affects how easily photographers frame and review images. The Casio sports a 2.7-inch fixed LCD with just 230k-dot resolution. It’s adequate in bright daylight but feels cramped and lacking crispness - fine for quick snaps but not ideal for manual focus or detailed composition.
The Sony A580’s 3-inch tilting display boasts excellent 922k-dot resolution, considerably sharper and versatile for composing at awkward angles. More importantly, the A580 includes an optical pentamirror viewfinder occupying about 95% coverage with 0.53× magnification. While not a professional-grade pentaprism, it provides a bright, lag-free real-world view, vital for action and precision shooting.
The Casio’s lack of any viewfinder limits use in bright sunlight and precise autofocus confirmation. The Sony’s combination of optical viewfinder and high-resolution LCD strikes a strong balance between traditional photography feel and digital convenience.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Decisive Moment
The EX-Z800 relies solely on contrast-detection autofocus, with a single AF point, no face or eye detection, and no continuous AF tracking. It offers only single-shot AF - more than enough when shooting static subjects like landscapes or pets but frustratingly slow and unreliable for moving action.
The Sony A580 deploys a 15-point phase-detection AF array augmented by contrast detection during live view. Impressively, three focus points are cross-type sensors sensitive in both axes, enhancing accuracy. It supports single, continuous, and tracking AF modes, plus face detection for portraits.
Shooting burst rates tell a similar story: the EX-Z800 lacks continuous shooting, limiting it to single frames. The A580 outputs up to 7 fps bursts, excellent for sports and wildlife photographers chasing fleeting moments.
Flash and Low-Light Performance: Lighting the Scene
Both cameras feature built-in pop-up flashes, but their capabilities differ considerably. The Casio’s flash modes cover the basics - auto, red eye reduction, on, and off - without advanced sync modes or external flash compatibility. Its range is unspecified but generally limited.
Sony steps up with a more robust flash system. The A580 supports multiple advanced modes: slow sync, high-speed sync, rear curtain sync, fill-flash, and wireless TTL flash with external strobes. Its flash range reportedly expands to 12 meters, suitable for event and portrait use.
Sensor stabilization is present in both, with the Casio relying on sensor-shift image stabilization. The Sony also features sensor-based stabilization, which extends to most lenses, enhancing handheld low-light capability.
Versatility Across Genres: Who Wins Where?
Portraiture: Rendering Skin Tones and Bokeh
The Sony’s APS-C sensor and broad lens compatibility allow it to produce portraits with smooth skin tones, natural colors, and rich depth-of-field separation. Face detection and AF tracking ensure sharp eyes, essential for expressive portraits. The Casio’s small sensor and fixed lens limit shallow depth of field and tend to flatten subject tones under artificial lighting.
Landscape: Capturing Detail and Dynamic Range
Thanks to better dynamic range (13.3 EV vs. unknown for Casio) and higher max resolution (16 MP vs. 14 MP), the Sony excels for landscapes. Its ability to capture subtle tonal transitions in bright skies and shadow details outclasses the Casio’s output. Weather sealing is absent on both, although the Sony’s sturdier build may tolerate damp conditions better.
Wildlife and Sports: Speed and Reach
The Casio’s zoom tops out at a modest 108 mm equivalent (27-108 mm lens with 5.8× crop multiplier), poorly suited for distant subjects. No continuous burst shooting or tracking AF rules it out for fast action. The Sony, combined with a telephoto lens, offers strong autofocus capabilities and 7 fps burst shooting - adequate for novice wildlife or sports shooters.
Street and Travel: Discretion and Portability
Here, the Casio’s compact size and light weight win hands down. It slips unobtrusively in a pocket, ideal for candid city scenes and travel snapshots. However, its weaker low-light performance and slower AF can be frustrating. The Sony, while bulkier (over 4 times heavier), holds more promise for travelers willing to carry the gear in return for superior image quality and versatility.
Macro: Close Focus and Fine Detail
Neither camera is specialized for macro. The Casio lacks a defined macro focus range, while the Sony’s performance depends entirely on the choice of lens. With the right dedicated macro optics, the A580 can achieve remarkably detailed close-ups - well beyond the Casio’s fixed lens.
Night and Astro: High ISO and Exposure Handling
Sony’s advanced sensor and image processor handle high ISO settings gracefully, enabling handheld night scenes and astrophotography with lower noise and better color fidelity. The Casio’s maximum ISO 3200 is nominal but effectively noisy above ISO 400, limiting its night use. Manual exposure modes on the Sony allow long exposures - a prerequisite for astrophotography - while the Casio offers none.
Video: From Vlogs to Documentaries
Video is another domain where the A580 shines. Its Full HD 1080p recording at 60 fps (AVCHD format) with a microphone port provides flexible, high-quality clips suitable for semi-professional use. The Casio caps out at 720p (1280 × 720) 20 fps in Motion JPEG, producing softer footage with less fluid motion.
Professional and Workflow Considerations
The Sony’s RAW shooting and extensive exposure control enable professionals to integrate images seamlessly into post-production pipelines. Dual card slots help with backup and workflow flexibility. The Casio’s JPEG-only workflow and single SD slot severely limit professional use.
Technical Insights: Connectivity, Battery Life, and Build
The A580 supports Eye-Fi wireless transfer, HDMI output, and USB 2.0, facilitating file sharing and tethered shooting - features lacking on the Casio, which offers only USB 2.0. Battery life favors Sony heavily, rated at 1050 shots per charge vs. the Casio’s unspecified and likely modest endurance.
Neither model offers weather sealing or ruggedness features like waterproofing or shockproofing. The Sony’s all-plastic construction feels robust but isn’t professional weather-resistant.
Scoring the Cameras: Overall and Per Photography Genre
After hands-on testing and objective measurements, here’s how the two stack up numerically:
The Sony A580 scores notably higher across nearly every category: image quality, autofocus, shooting speed, video capabilities, and professional workflows. The Casio EX-Z800 performs acceptably in ultracompact portability and casual daylight use but falls behind sharply otherwise.
Price and Value: Are You Getting Your Money’s Worth?
The Casio EX-Z800 is very affordable (~$150), perfect if budget and convenience are paramount. It fulfills basic snapshot needs without fuss but hasn’t aged gracefully given its limitations and lack of ongoing support.
The Sony A580's price (~$850) reflects its sophisticated feature set, build quality, and DSLR versatility. For enthusiasts ready to learn and expand, it’s an excellent value, unlocking a wide universe of lenses and manual control.
Final Verdict: Match Your Camera to Your Photography Goals
Choose the Casio EX-Z800 if you:
- Want a tiny, pocketable camera for everyday travel and snapshots
- Desire simplicity without manual settings headaches
- Shoot mostly in daylight without fast action or complex lighting
- Have a very limited budget
Opt for the Sony A580 if you:
- Crave higher image quality and dynamic range with low noise at high ISO
- Plan to explore creative control with manual exposure, RAW, and interchangeable lenses
- Need reliable autofocus and fast continuous shooting for sports, wildlife, or kids
- Want superior video recording options and professional workflow compatibility
- Don’t mind carrying extra weight for the sake of capability and growth
In closing, these two cameras inhabit fundamentally different worlds. The Casio EX-Z800 is a snap-and-go ultracompact whose simplified design and low price still serve casual users well in 2010-era contexts. Yet in 2024, its narrow feature scope and image quality limits make it a niche choice.
The Sony Alpha DSLR-A580, on the other hand, remains a commendable entry-level DSLR with solid performance across all core photography disciplines. Its sensor size advantage, versatility, and ergonomic design make it a far better long-term investment for serious hobbyists and aspiring pros alike.
If your passion for photography runs deep and you want a camera that can grow with you, Sony’s A580 remains a compelling choice. But if convenience and pocketability outweigh everything else, the Casio EX-Z800 still quietly does its job.
As always, I recommend trying to hold and shoot with each camera - comfort, intuitive menus, and image output quality speak volumes beyond specs. Happy shooting!
Casio EX-Z800 vs Sony A580 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A580 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Sony |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A580 |
Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2011-05-26 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 599 grams (1.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 137 x 104 x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1121 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 1050 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Two |
Pricing at launch | $150 | $848 |